Azure Stream Analytics vs. IBM StreamSets

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Azure Stream Analytics
Score 8.0 out of 10
N/A
Microsoft offers Azure Stream Analytics for IoT and connected devices, supporting real-time analytics and reporting.
$0.11
per hour with a 1 SU minimum
IBM StreamSets
Score 8.0 out of 10
N/A
IBM® StreamSets enables users to create and manage smart streaming data pipelines through a graphical interface, facilitating data integration across hybrid and multicloud environments. IBM StreamSets can support millions of data pipelines for analytics, applications and hybrid integration.N/A
Pricing
Azure Stream AnalyticsIBM StreamSets
Editions & Modules
Standard
$0.11
per hour with a 1 SU minimum
Dedicated
$0.11
per hour with a 36 SU minimum
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Azure Stream AnalyticsIBM StreamSets
Free Trial
NoNo
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional DetailsAzure Stream Analytics is priced by the number of Streaming Units provisioned. A Streaming Unit represents the amount of memory and compute allocated to your resources.
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Azure Stream AnalyticsIBM StreamSets
Features
Azure Stream AnalyticsIBM StreamSets
Streaming Analytics
Comparison of Streaming Analytics features of Product A and Product B
Azure Stream Analytics
6.1
1 Ratings
27% below category average
IBM StreamSets
-
Ratings
Real-Time Data Analysis7.01 Ratings00 Ratings
Data Ingestion from Multiple Data Sources7.01 Ratings00 Ratings
Low Latency8.01 Ratings00 Ratings
Integrated Development Tools2.01 Ratings00 Ratings
Data wrangling and preparation7.01 Ratings00 Ratings
Linear Scale-Out5.01 Ratings00 Ratings
Data Enrichment7.01 Ratings00 Ratings
Best Alternatives
Azure Stream AnalyticsIBM StreamSets
Small Businesses
IBM Streams (discontinued)
IBM Streams (discontinued)
Score 9.0 out of 10
Skyvia
Skyvia
Score 10.0 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
Confluent
Confluent
Score 9.2 out of 10
Astera Data Pipeline Builder (Centerprise)
Astera Data Pipeline Builder (Centerprise)
Score 8.9 out of 10
Enterprises
Spotfire Streaming
Spotfire Streaming
Score 5.2 out of 10
Control-M
Control-M
Score 9.3 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
Azure Stream AnalyticsIBM StreamSets
Likelihood to Recommend
7.0
(1 ratings)
7.3
(10 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
-
(0 ratings)
6.4
(1 ratings)
Usability
-
(0 ratings)
7.5
(9 ratings)
Support Rating
-
(0 ratings)
5.5
(1 ratings)
User Testimonials
Azure Stream AnalyticsIBM StreamSets
Likelihood to Recommend
Microsoft
Data enrichment is effectively done in stream analytics also checking the values with different functionality like windowing and group by clause is effectively working.
Read full review
IBM
IBM StreamSets excels in real-time logistics data ingestion and transformation across hybrid systems. It’s less ideal for lightweight ETL tasks or static datasets where simpler tools can achieve similar results with less overhead and complexity.
Read full review
Pros
Microsoft
  • Routing of data from multiple inputs to multiple output
  • You create your own user define function.
  • Intermediate query is working very effectively.
Read full review
IBM
  • It helps streaming huge data that we have in our Teradata database to various reporting applications that runs on cloud seamlessly.
  • We also use IBM StreamSets to power few BI dashboards that our product managers use on regular basis to showcase various data with clients.
  • I think the data quality is way better compared to Informatica tool.
Read full review
Cons
Microsoft
  • Code competency is not that much effective
  • Ml models can't be integrated with stream analytics
Read full review
IBM
  • The error messages I feel aren t always very descriptive so troubleshooting can take longer
  • Maybe more customisation options for scheduling can be done, rest it works pretty well.
Read full review
Likelihood to Renew
Microsoft
No answers on this topic
IBM
IBM Stream sets has been a wonderful addition to our technology stack. It has helped in some of our initiatives such as data engineering, data integration for not only external customers but also for internal purposes. The tool has also helped on our use cases related to streaming data. Moving to another tool would require significant amount of work and time.
Read full review
Usability
Microsoft
No answers on this topic
IBM
The StreamSets platform is very easy to use and the interface is extremely intuitive. The drag-and-drop, low-code design makes it accessible for teams with varying technical skills, allowing us to quickly connect sources, define transformations, and deploy pipelines without heavy coding. StreamSets allows us to get started quickly and not have to worry about our pipelines breaking once they're built.
Read full review
Support Rating
Microsoft
No answers on this topic
IBM
Streamsets support has improved a lot in the last couple of years. We had some challenges in the beginning with support, but now the quality of the support and the responsiveness to tickets are better. We have contacted support multiple times when it came to scenarios where the system was slow or the output as not as we expected
Read full review
Implementation Rating
Microsoft
No answers on this topic
IBM
I was not involved in the implementation
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
Microsoft
Azure Stream Analytics is easy to implement and also to integrate compare to other services like iot analytics
Read full review
IBM
First advantage is that this software is particularly new and it keeps updating according to the needs of the user. Other advantage is the it organises and produces conclusions on the basis of data without leaving any relevant information. Other softwares lack in data summarising and readability of the charts and sheets they produce.
Read full review
Return on Investment
Microsoft
  • Very nice roi while using it.
  • Multiple integration is the best functionality
Read full review
IBM
  • time saving for automatic collection and integration of data
  • time saving thanks to live monitoring and reaction
  • time saving for standardization of data
Read full review
ScreenShots