TrustRadius: an HG Insights company

Azure Traffic Manager vs. Keysight Bypass Switches

Save this comparison

Save this comparison

Add Product

Recommended Comparisons

    Overview
    ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price

    Azure Traffic Manager

    Score9.7 out of 10
    N/AMicrosoft's Azure Traffic Manager operates at the DNS layer to quickly and efficiently direct incoming DNS requests based on the routing method of your choice.N/A

    Keysight Bypass Switches

    Score10 out of 10
    N/AKeysight Bypass Switches are failsafe devices designed to ensure high availability and uptime of monitoring and security deployments, provided by Keysight Technologies division Ixia. Keysight acquired Ixia in 2017.N/A
    Pricing
    Azure Traffic ManagerKeysight Bypass Switches
    Editions & Modules
    No answers on this topic
    No answers on this topic
    Offerings
    Pricing Offerings
    Azure Traffic ManagerKeysight Bypass Switches
    Free Trial
    NoNo
    Free/Freemium Version
    NoNo
    Premium Consulting/Integration Services
    NoNo
    Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
    Additional Details——
    More Pricing Information
    User Ratings
    Azure Traffic ManagerKeysight Bypass Switches
    Likelihood to Recommend
    10.0
    (1 ratings)
    10.0
    (1 ratings)
    User Testimonials
    Azure Traffic ManagerKeysight Bypass Switches
    Likelihood to Recommend
    Microsoft
    Azure Traffic Manager is a great product, if you have multiple sites hosting similar services (Primary and DR), and you want to ensure that users are directed to the DR in case of a primary datacenter failure, [Azure] Traffic Manager does this very nicely. If you have a service hosted across multiple regions/datacenters and you want to balance the inbound load between the regions, [Azure] Traffic Manager does this very well, of course such scenario would require a database replication or something like Cosmos-DB in the backend [Azure Traffic Manager] is also well suited for inbound traffic with multiple IPs, you can fail-over traffic from one inbound IP to another based on its availability, or if you have multiple internet connections that you want to balance the load across, it does this pretty nicely too.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Keysight Technologies
    Well suited for layer two networks where you need physical link monitoring as well as service monitoring. In our case, we monitor the ports and services for FireEye by looping traffic via FireEye, and if that packet is not received on the Ixia after sent it will mark the FireEye down. Not suited for any type of "normal" switching or load-balancing.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Pros
    Microsoft
    • Performance DNS Load Balancing for Lowest Latency Endpoint to Clients
    • Priority-Based DNS Load Balancing to ensure maximum up time for a service
    • Geographic-based DNS Load Balancing to force certain clients in certain regions to connect to specific endpoints
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Keysight Technologies
    • Link state monitoring
    • Service monitoring of the stub devices
    • Link state propagation
    • Battery backup for power loss
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Cons
    Microsoft
    • Traffic View is a great feature, but doesn't work very well, sometimes it gets stuck and stops loading traffic view data
    • Automatic probing for endpoints sometimes gets stuck too, I would recommend a technique to test the endpoint in real time from Azure Portal
    • Traffic View heatmap is buggy and doesn't point correctly to locations
    • Traffic View portal doesn't show source countries (Shows coordinates) it would be much more helpful to have coordinates auto-translated to geolocations/countries
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Keysight Technologies
    • Setup is pretty complex
    • Alerting is minimal unless you also purchase the Ixia management server software.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Alternatives Considered
    Microsoft
    Amazon Route 53 Traffic Flow does what [Azure] Traffic Manager does, however, in Azure Configuration is separated between Azure DNS Zones (For DNS Zone Management) and [Azure] Traffic Manager for DNS Traffic Management and Load Balancing, Route 53 in a unified product for DNS Traffic Management using Traffic Flow and DNS Zone Management. Route 53 does a great job, however, we found it to be a little bit more complex to setup than [Azure] Traffic Manager, Setting up traffic manager is pretty easy even for the first time, and getting the best out of it is relatively simple.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Keysight Technologies
    F5 while allows the load balancing aspect would not propagate link state as well.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Return on Investment
    Microsoft
    • Service cost is exceptionally low
    • Overall, this product saves a lot of money for the value it provides and it isn't expensive
    • It's around half a dollar per million queries, which is truly peanuts, extras may be required if you do advanced configuration
    • I can't see any reason why any business wouldn't be using this product, very low investment for a very high return and savings
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Keysight Technologies
    • While expensive, it has reduced our downtime due to the FireEYE outages and upgrades
    • Increased our cost for the FireEye which is really a negative of the FireEye and not the Ixia.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    ScreenShots