Azure Virtual Machines vs. Firecracker
| Product | Rating | Most Used By | Product Summary | Starting Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|
![]() Azure Virtual Machines | Score8.1 out of 10 | N/A | Virtual Machines (VMs) are available on Microsoft Azure, providing what is built as a low-cost, per-second compute service, available via Windows or Linux. | $0 Per Hour |
Firecracker | Score4 out of 10 | N/A | Firecracker is an open source virtualization technology that is purpose-built for creating and managing secure, multi-tenant container and function-based services. Firecracker enables users to deploy workloads in lightweight virtual machines, called microVMs that may provide security and workload isolation over traditional VMs, while enabling the speed and resource efficiency of containers. Firecracker was developed at Amazon Web Services with the goal of improving services like AWS Lambda… | N/A |
| Azure Virtual Machines | Firecracker | |||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Editions & Modules |
| No answers on this topic | ||||||||||||||
| Offerings |
| |||||||||||||||
| Entry-level Setup Fee | No setup fee | No setup fee | ||||||||||||||
| Additional Details | — | — | ||||||||||||||
| More Pricing Information | ||||||||||||||||
| Azure Virtual Machines | Firecracker | |
|---|---|---|
| Considered Both Products | ![]() No answer on this topic | No answer on this topic |
| Key User Insights | ||
| Would buy again | ||
96% Would buy again 25 Answers | No answers on this topic | |
| Delivers good value for the price | ||
92% Delivers good value for the price 22 Answers | No answers on this topic | |
| Happy with the feature set | ||
96% Happy with the feature set 25 Answers | No answers on this topic | |
| Lived up to sales and marketing promises | ||
95% Lived up to sales and marketing promises 21 Answers | No answers on this topic | |
| Implementation went as expected | ||
96% Implementation went as expected 25 Answers | No answers on this topic | |
| Azure Virtual Machines | Firecracker | |||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Server Virtualization |
| |||||||||||||||||||
| Azure Virtual Machines | Firecracker | |
|---|---|---|
| Small Businesses | Proxmox VE Score9.2 out of 10 | Proxmox VE Score9.2 out of 10 |
| Medium-sized Companies | VMware vSOM (discontinued) Score10 out of 10 | VMware vSOM (discontinued) Score10 out of 10 |
| Enterprises | ![]() IBM PowerVM Score9.6 out of 10 | ![]() IBM PowerVM Score9.6 out of 10 |
| All Alternatives | View all alternatives | View all alternatives |
| Azure Virtual Machines | Firecracker | |
|---|---|---|
| Likelihood to Recommend | 9.4 | 4.0 |
| Likelihood to Renew | 8.0 | - |
| Usability | 9.0 | - |
| Support Rating | 6.0 | - |
| Azure Virtual Machines | Firecracker | |
|---|---|---|
| Likelihood to Recommend | ![]()
|
|
| Pros | ![]()
|
|
| Cons | ![]()
|
|
| Likelihood to Renew | ![]()
| No answers on this topic |
| Usability | ![]()
| No answers on this topic |
| Support Rating | ![]()
| No answers on this topic |
| Alternatives Considered | ![]()
| No answers on this topic |
| Return on Investment | ![]()
|
|
| ScreenShots |



