Azure Virtual Network vs. FlexiHub

For SAAS it's not required but for most of IAAS and PAAS components Virtual network are required the deployment of storage account doesn't require virtual network .

Incentivized

We’ve put FlexiHub through its paces to see if it’s any good for remote vehicle health checks. We tried the app out with a handful of USB devices for car diagnostics and so far, everything is going smoothly. We also worked to develop an iOS app for remote diagnostics. Our testers from another office easily connected over the Internet thanks to FlexiHub. FlexiHub works perfectly in UDP connections, and needs an Internet connection. But there is no opportunity to work over LAN. This can be an issue.

• Allows connectivity within Vnet
• Secure Communication can be established
• Security Rules can be enforced
• Routing Can be Established

Incentivized

• User-Friendly Interface
• Efficient Troubleshooting
• Flexible Connectivity Options

• Integration of Express Routes needs to be simplified
• Endpoints Security has to be available in Vnet itself

Incentivized

• Stable connections, but some devices are not recognized correctly
• Pricing is too high

During Initial Phase itself on cloud Journey Azure Services was opted for there was no comparison done

Incentivized

I made the switch to FlexiHub because I found it to be more reliable and user-friendly for my specific needs. FlexiHub offers a more seamless experience when it comes to remotely accessing and managing USB devices, with fewer connectivity issues compared to the other products I was using. also TeamViewer's pricing structure didn't align well with my needs. FlexiHub's subscription plans offered a better fit for my usage.

• Deployment of Gateway needs to be faster as it takes a lot of time which is negative

Incentivized

• We have increased our productivity due to the ability of remote access
• Developed and tested the app with remote USB access
• We can work with our freelance and remote testers; all we need is an Internet connection