Azure Virtual WAN vs. SDWAN|Link

Azure Virtual WAN provides single functional interphase for routing, monitoring, connectivity and security operations. The connection of hubs in Azure virtual WAN makes it simple for us to use Microsoft as the pillar of our spoke connectivity. The platform provides us with robust connectivity features that allow for transitive connectivity across different spokes. However, you should always ensure you have understood your total cost of ownership to avoid potential price bombshells.

Incentivized

It’s great tool to manage our network environment and the additional features allow us to troubleshoot better than the old days. Templates is great allowing us to push updates within a few clicks

• It offers a seamless experience while connecting Virtual networks and Workloads via Azure Hub.
• Lot of connectivity options present - site to site VPN/Express route etc.
• Very easy connectivity and migration with on-premise sites and Azure Hub.

Incentivized

• Integrations are limited within Azure. It is difficult to carry out multi-cloud integrations.
• If you haven't understood your monthly cost you can receive price shocks.

Incentivized

The SDWAN|Link performs well in path selection, traffic steering and consistent application experience

As we were already using Azure as a cloud platform, it was easy setting up a Virtual WAN inside Azure as users/developers and DevOps engineers were familiar with the user interface and functioning as compared to going to some other portal for just the VWAN solution. The umbrella of features provided by Azure Virtual WAN made it the right choice for our infrastructure.

Incentivized

• Automatic troubleshooting solves incidents without costing our operational time.
• We are able unify all our operational activities.

Incentivized