Azure Virtual WAN vs. Oracle SD-WAN (Talari) vs. Palo Alto Networks Prisma SD-WAN

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Azure Virtual WAN
Score 8.4 out of 10
N/A
Microsoft's Azure Virtual WAN connects global branch offices, point-of-sale locations, and sites using Azure and the Microsoft global network. With it the user can plan, configure, and seamlessly deploy new connections.N/A
Oracle SD-WAN (Talari)
Score 8.0 out of 10
N/A
The vendor states that Oracle SD-WAN was created to solve the ongoing IT challenges network managers face every day—from expensive, sluggish, inflexible WANs to difficulties deploying new office WAN links and accessing cloud services. With Oracle SD-WAN, enterprises can benefit from internet economics, leverage high-bandwidth and inexpensive Internet connections, and safely migrate applications to the public cloud and SaaS at their own pace. The technology is based on Oracle's 2018 acquisition…N/A
Palo Alto Networks Prisma SD-WAN
Score 8.5 out of 10
N/A
Prisma SD-WAN (formerly known as CloudGenix but now as Prisma from Palo Alto Networks since being acquired in April 2020) offers an Autonomous SD-WAN solution, designed to provide app-policies aligned to business intent, along with direct access to multi-cloud and dev-ops frameworks to deliver unparalleled productivity gains, and cost-savings compared to first generation SD-WAN alternatives.N/A
Pricing
Azure Virtual WANOracle SD-WAN (Talari)Palo Alto Networks Prisma SD-WAN
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Azure Virtual WANOracle SD-WAN (Talari)Palo Alto Networks Prisma SD-WAN
Free Trial
NoNoNo
Free/Freemium Version
NoNoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Azure Virtual WANOracle SD-WAN (Talari)Palo Alto Networks Prisma SD-WAN
Best Alternatives
Azure Virtual WANOracle SD-WAN (Talari)Palo Alto Networks Prisma SD-WAN
Small Businesses

No answers on this topic

No answers on this topic

No answers on this topic

Medium-sized Companies
Cisco Meraki MX
Cisco Meraki MX
Score 9.1 out of 10
Cisco Meraki MX
Cisco Meraki MX
Score 9.1 out of 10
Cisco Meraki MX
Cisco Meraki MX
Score 9.1 out of 10
Enterprises
Cisco Meraki MX
Cisco Meraki MX
Score 9.1 out of 10
Cisco Meraki MX
Cisco Meraki MX
Score 9.1 out of 10
Cisco Meraki MX
Cisco Meraki MX
Score 9.1 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
Azure Virtual WANOracle SD-WAN (Talari)Palo Alto Networks Prisma SD-WAN
Likelihood to Recommend
8.4
(2 ratings)
8.0
(2 ratings)
9.0
(2 ratings)
Support Rating
-
(0 ratings)
8.0
(1 ratings)
7.0
(1 ratings)
User Testimonials
Azure Virtual WANOracle SD-WAN (Talari)Palo Alto Networks Prisma SD-WAN
Likelihood to Recommend
Microsoft
Azure Virtual WAN provides single functional interphase for routing, monitoring, connectivity and security operations. The connection of hubs in Azure virtual WAN makes it simple for us to use Microsoft as the pillar of our spoke connectivity. The platform provides us with robust connectivity features that allow for transitive connectivity across different spokes. However, you should always ensure you have understood your total cost of ownership to avoid potential price bombshells.
Read full review
Oracle
Product has been around for a long time and the stability and features are excellent. Now that Oracle owns it, its long-term viability is both improved (given Oracle isn't going anywhere anytime soon), but all the layers of bureaucracy and auditing that Oracle is famous for comes along with it.
Read full review
Palo Alto Networks
CloudGenix would be suited for any company that has an internet connection if you have multiple sites you could use this to help with network traffic and what should take precedence over other applications. If you didn't have various sites, you could go with another type of internet connection.CloudGenix may not be suited for that scenario.
Read full review
Pros
Microsoft
  • It offers a seamless experience while connecting Virtual networks and Workloads via Azure Hub.
  • Lot of connectivity options present - site to site VPN/Express route etc.
  • Very easy connectivity and migration with on-premise sites and Azure Hub.
Read full review
Oracle
  • Failsafe- ability to aggregate low cost link and increase enterprise WAN bandwidth and also provide safe failor over in case of link interruption, with almost zero drops. In a lab test for voice it works perfectly for voice.
  • Config Change without system interruption (change config and apply it during Maintenance windows).
Read full review
Palo Alto Networks
  • The ability to see all traffic and pinpoint issues.
  • Ability to prioritize applications and their traffic.
Read full review
Cons
Microsoft
  • Integrations are limited within Azure. It is difficult to carry out multi-cloud integrations.
  • If you haven't understood your monthly cost you can receive price shocks.
Read full review
Oracle
  • Talari Aware management solution very complex to set up useful dashboards
  • Management interface seems overly complex (7.3), though this was supposedly improved in 9.0
Read full review
Palo Alto Networks
  • Some warning messages are hard to pinpoint the actual issue.
  • Support was faster at first, seems to not be as quick as in the beginning.
Read full review
Support Rating
Microsoft
No answers on this topic
Oracle
So far so good. I have no problems with support; they were able to deliver a good service to us every time we needed it.
Read full review
Palo Alto Networks
The support was super fast in the beginning. Sometimes it seems now that the support does not get back to you as quickly. When we do get in contact with the support, they are usually knowledgeable and can help find the problem. The support has also been easy to work with.
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
Microsoft
As we were already using Azure as a cloud platform, it was easy setting up a Virtual WAN inside Azure as users/developers and DevOps engineers were familiar with the user interface and functioning as compared to going to some other portal for just the VWAN solution. The umbrella of features provided by Azure Virtual WAN made it the right choice for our infrastructure.
Read full review
Oracle
While I haven't looked at Silverpeak in a long time and haven't used any of the other big players, this product is a dedicated SD-WAN solution, so no need to get a combination device, unless that's important. We will likely implement SD-WAN through our next firewall platform refresh as a backup to Talari.
Read full review
Palo Alto Networks
CloudGenix is the first product with SDWAN that we have used. There are others out there, but I cannot speak to those as I do not have any experience with them.
Read full review
Return on Investment
Microsoft
  • Automatic troubleshooting solves incidents without costing our operational time.
  • We are able unify all our operational activities.
Read full review
Oracle
  • lowes oue WAN links Cost
  • Lower our Tshoot time /remote office
Read full review
Palo Alto Networks
  • It has saved us a lot of money moving from an MPLS connection.
  • It has given better video quality with international calls.
Read full review
ScreenShots