TrustRadius

BaseRock AI vs. BlazeMeter

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
BaseRock AI
Score 0.0 out of 10
N/A
BaseRock AI is an enterprise-grade software quality platform that leverages artificial intelligence to automate and enhance the software testing lifecycle. BaseRock automates unit and integration test creation, execution, and maintenance to enables organizations to ship software faster, while allowing developers to focus on innovation rather than repetitive testing tasks. Key Features 1. AI-Powered Test Generation and Execution BaseRock’s core engine uses advanced…
$14.99
per month
BlazeMeter
Score 8.0 out of 10
N/A
The BlazeMeter Continuous Testing Platform is a unified, end-to-end, next-generation software test automation platform built for both Agile and COE teams, from Perforce. BlazeMeter includes complete continuous testing capabilities deeply integrated into a single, intuitive workflow.
$149
per month
Pricing
BaseRock AIBlazeMeter
Editions & Modules
Pro
$14.99
per month
Growth
$39
per month (billed annually)
Enterprise
Contact Sales
Basic
$149.00
per month
Pro
$649.00
per month
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
BaseRock AIBlazeMeter
Free Trial
NoNo
Free/Freemium Version
YesYes
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details——
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
BaseRock AIBlazeMeter
Considered Both Products
BaseRock AI

No answer on this topic

BlazeMeter
Verified User
Anonymous
Chose BlazeMeter
BlazeMeter scores well against Apache JMeter in one Key point , the load generation from different cloud based systems. This helps to measure the capacity of the the application in a transparent way and not bogged down by the capacity of the system from where the test is …
Verified User
Anonymous
Chose BlazeMeter
In comparison with Blazemeter the closes competitor is JMeter but it has disadvantages like it is not a tool that can be use as a collaborative tool and works locally in a computer, Blazemeter is in the web so different people can access and run tests or collaborate do add, …
Verified User
Anonymous
Chose BlazeMeter
BlazeMeter integrates better with a continuous delivery pipeline than SOASTA did.
Verified User
Anonymous
Chose BlazeMeter
Personally, I prefer using JMeter + Redline13, however we had some business folks that wanted to be able to run a few of their own tests. The non-technical individuals preferred to use Blazemeter because of its simple and intuitive UI.
Features
BaseRock AIBlazeMeter
Automation Testing
Comparison of Automation Testing features of Product A and Product B
BaseRock AI
-
Ratings
BlazeMeter
9.0
Ratings
7% above category average
CI/CD Tool Integration00 Ratings9.00 Ratings
Integrated Version Control00 Ratings9.00 Ratings
Data-Driven Testing00 Ratings9.00 Ratings
Testing Collaboration00 Ratings9.00 Ratings
Testing Reports & Analytics00 Ratings9.00 Ratings
Best Alternatives
BaseRock AIBlazeMeter
Small Businesses
BrowserStack
BrowserStack
Score 8.4 out of 10
BrowserStack
BrowserStack
Score 8.4 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
ReadyAPI
ReadyAPI
Score 6.1 out of 10
ReadyAPI
ReadyAPI
Score 6.1 out of 10
Enterprises
ignio AIOps
ignio AIOps
Score 8.1 out of 10
ignio AIOps
ignio AIOps
Score 8.1 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
BaseRock AIBlazeMeter
Likelihood to Recommend
-
(0 ratings)
9.0
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
BaseRock AIBlazeMeter
Likelihood to Recommend
No answers on this topic
It is good for measurements of performance testing. It can be used to run API testing. I can not use this for monitoring but it can be used as a complement for monitoring tools (like Catchpoint or New Relic). It can help to produce load on your site and monitor.
Verified User
Anonymous
Read full review
Pros
No answers on this topic
  • Blazemeter has very intuitive and uncluttered UI. It is very easy for a beginner to figure out and get started.
  • Blazemeter allows several methods of creating performance tests - using several popular open source applications. Therefore most often there is no need to learn to use a new tool or language.
Verified User
Anonymous
Read full review
Cons
No answers on this topic
  • BlazeMeter should not require the purchase of 2 dedicated IPs for each suite of performance tests.
  • BlazeMeter should make custom packages cheaper than they are today when purchased for an enterprise and should include dedicated IPs in the package.
  • BlazeMerer should have integration with Jenkins Pipeline 2.0.
Verified User
Anonymous
Read full review
Usability
No answers on this topic
Easy to setup to do API Performance Testing. Dashboard to showcase results Capability to showcase runtime results
AG
Alok Gupta
Manager System
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
No answers on this topic
BlazeMeter scores well against Apache JMeter in one Key point , the load generation from different cloud based systems. This helps to measure the capacity of the the application in a transparent way and not bogged down by the capacity of the system from where the test is executed (in this case Apache JMeter)
Verified User
Anonymous
Read full review
Return on Investment
No answers on this topic
  • BlazeMerter helped performance tests run on their cloud, thereby diminishing our on-prem setup costs tremendously.
  • BlazeMeter pings our application from several geographical locations, thereby simulating real life users.
  • BlazeMeter offers dedicated IPs so that firewall issues can be bypassed.
Verified User
Anonymous
Read full review
ScreenShots