What users are saying about
10 Ratings
10 Ratings
<a href='https://www.trustradius.com/static/about-trustradius-scoring' target='_blank' rel='nofollow'>trScore algorithm: Learn more.</a>
Score 7.1 out of 101

Add comparison

Likelihood to Recommend

BlazeMeter

It is suited for most API scenarios that we have tried. However, it does not fit in well for big data solutions.
No photo available

Feature Rating Comparison

Load Testing

BlazeMeter
7.0
End to end performance management
BlazeMeter
7.0
Integrated performance data
BlazeMeter
7.0
Deployment model flexibility
BlazeMeter
7.0

Pros

  • BlazeMeter takes the .jmx script that teams had written for JMeter. The transition from JMeter to BlazeMeter was seamless.
  • BlazeMeter offers its own cloud and hence we did not have to set it up on-premise.
  • BlazeMeter hits our application from various geographic locations that simulates real life users.
No photo available

Cons

  • BlazeMeter should not require the purchase of 2 dedicated IPs for each suite of performance tests.
  • BlazeMeter should make custom packages cheaper than they are today when purchased for an enterprise and should include dedicated IPs in the package.
  • BlazeMerer should have integration with Jenkins Pipeline 2.0.
No photo available

Alternatives Considered

BlazeMeter integrates better with a continuous delivery pipeline than SOASTA did.
No photo available

Return on Investment

  • BlazeMerter helped performance tests run on their cloud, thereby diminishing our on-prem setup costs tremendously.
  • BlazeMeter pings our application from several geographical locations, thereby simulating real life users.
  • BlazeMeter offers dedicated IPs so that firewall issues can be bypassed.
No photo available

Pricing Details

BlazeMeter

General
Free Trial
Free/Freemium Version
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
Entry-level set up fee?
No
Additional Pricing Details