TrustRadius

Batfish vs. OpenText AccuRev

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Batfish
Score 0.0 out of 10
N/A
Batfish is an open source network configuration analysis tool. Batfish finds errors and guarantees the correctness of planned or current network configurations. It enables safe and rapid network evolution, without the fear of outages or security breaches. Batfish was originally developed by researchers at Microsoft Research, UCLA, and USC. Others have since contributed to it.
$0
OpenText AccuRev
Score 4.0 out of 10
N/A
AccuRev, a software configuration management offering, is now owned and supported by Micro Focus since the December 2013 acquisition, and now by OpenText.N/A
Pricing
BatfishOpenText AccuRev
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
BatfishOpenText AccuRev
Free Trial
NoNo
Free/Freemium Version
YesNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeOptional
Additional Details——
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
BatfishOpenText AccuRev
User Ratings
BatfishOpenText AccuRev
Likelihood to Recommend
-
(0 ratings)
1.0
(4 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
-
(0 ratings)
6.1
(3 ratings)
Availability
-
(0 ratings)
7.0
(1 ratings)
User Testimonials
BatfishOpenText AccuRev
Likelihood to Recommend
Open Source
No answers on this topic
OpenText
Very slow and not intuitive; it would be my last choice for version control systems.The UI is a little confusing at times and seems a little outdated. It needs a lot of improvement. It is suited for small projects and fewer number of projects. But if there are huge projects and many projects to be maintained in a portfolio, its a little hard to manage.
Verified User
Anonymous
Read full review
Pros
Open Source
No answers on this topic
OpenText
  • One place for most recent code with history, avoid any conflict/confusion among other team/members.
  • Stream/Workflow approach to control approval process betwen all the teams, which I couldn't find in other version control tools I worked.
  • Bundle our code in a small group (called, Issues in Accurev) to differentiate between different projects.
Nishant Bilaiya | TrustRadius Reviewer
Nishant Bilaiya
Senior Consultant
Read full review
Cons
Open Source
No answers on this topic
OpenText
  • Ability to zoom in/out for stream-view. We currently have many streams/substreams and unable to view the entire workflow. Zooming in/out would benefit.
  • Being a designer, I use Adobe Flash and SWF files. When updating the SWF files, Accurev does not see these files as being changed and you will be unable to promote. In order to push changes, you must totally rename the SWF file.
Verified User
Anonymous
Read full review
Likelihood to Renew
Open Source
No answers on this topic
OpenText
We will renew because it is part of our build process.
Jason Vroustouris | TrustRadius Reviewer
Jason Vroustouris
Lead Java Developer
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
Open Source
No answers on this topic
OpenText
In my view, accurev ranks very low compared to other tools I have used. Microsoft TFS is the best in the industry as of today as it's a complete ALM solution. It does code version, bug tracking, user story documentation, and has easy integration with other external tools supporting many languages. So I would definitely recommend TFS to anyone.
Verified User
Anonymous
Read full review
Return on Investment
Open Source
No answers on this topic
OpenText
  • Better team coordination.
  • Avoid confusion by having one place for all documentation and code.
  • Better project management by having different work streams.
Nishant Bilaiya | TrustRadius Reviewer
Nishant Bilaiya
Senior Consultant
Read full review
ScreenShots