BindHQ vs. SchemeServe
| Product | Rating | Most Used By | Product Summary | Starting Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|
BindHQ | Score7 out of 10 | Mid-Size Companies (51-1,000 employees) | BindHQ’s agency operating system aims to enable technology-driven MGAs, MGUs & Wholesalers to bind more business and expand their revenue. BindHQ’s cloud-based platform reduces total cost of ownership with no hardware or servers to maintain, reduced upfront capital expenditures, and once the user is live, product upgrades are continuous, and automatic. BindHQ’s integrated, multiple line of business comparative rater instantly inputs, rates and compares… | $300 per month per user |
SchemeServe | N/A | N/A | Hosted in the cloud for MGAs, brokers and insurers, the SchemeServe platform boasts flexibility. It enables insurance professionals to create, rate and underwrite scheme insurance. Based in the UK, SchemeServe states their eponymous platform serves hundreds of insurance products worldwide. SchemeServe is designed to be simple enough to enable users to build products, or the company offers professional services to help users on their way. | N/A |
| BindHQ | SchemeServe | |||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Editions & Modules |
| No answers on this topic | ||||||||||||||
| Offerings |
| |||||||||||||||
| Entry-level Setup Fee | $25,000 per installation | No setup fee | ||||||||||||||
| Additional Details | — | — | ||||||||||||||
| More Pricing Information | ||||||||||||||||
| BindHQ | SchemeServe | |
|---|---|---|
| Considered Both Products | No answer on this topic | No answer on this topic |
| Key User Insights | ||
| Would buy again | ||
100% Would buy again 5 Answers | No answers on this topic | |
| Delivers good value for the price | ||
100% Delivers good value for the price 5 Answers | No answers on this topic | |
| Happy with the feature set | ||
100% Happy with the feature set 5 Answers | No answers on this topic | |
| Lived up to sales and marketing promises | ||
No answers on this topic | No answers on this topic | |
| Implementation went as expected | ||
No answers on this topic | No answers on this topic | |
| BindHQ | SchemeServe | |
|---|---|---|
| Likelihood to Recommend | 9.2 | - |
| Usability | 9.1 | - |
| Support Rating | 8.1 | - |
| BindHQ | SchemeServe | |
|---|---|---|
| Likelihood to Recommend |
| No answers on this topic |
| Pros |
| No answers on this topic |
| Cons |
| No answers on this topic |
| Usability |
| No answers on this topic |
| Support Rating |
| No answers on this topic |
| Alternatives Considered |
| No answers on this topic |
| Return on Investment |
| No answers on this topic |
| ScreenShots | BindHQ Screenshots |




