Bioclinica ICL vs. Medidata Rave CTMS

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Bioclinica ICL
Score 10.0 out of 10
N/A
BioClinica ICL is that company's imagine core lab service, which supports clinical trials with imaging services.N/A
Rave CTMS
Score 10.0 out of 10
N/A
Medidata Solutions, headquartered in New York offers their cloud-based clinical trial management system, Rave CTMS to support real-time tracking and reporting of study progress and data reconciliation.N/A
Pricing
Bioclinica ICLMedidata Rave CTMS
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Bioclinica ICLRave CTMS
Free Trial
NoNo
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details——
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Bioclinica ICLMedidata Rave CTMS
Top Pros

No answers on this topic

Top Cons

No answers on this topic

User Ratings
Bioclinica ICLMedidata Rave CTMS
Likelihood to Recommend
8.0
(1 ratings)
10.0
(1 ratings)
User Testimonials
Bioclinica ICLMedidata Rave CTMS
Likelihood to Recommend
Bioclinica
BioClinica ICL is well suited for meeting the requirements for regulatory filling and submission support, imagining collection and QC, centralized independent review for consistency purposes, site training and imagining archiving and sharing. The Bioclinica team also assist you with creating the database based on the protocol and study design. Bioclinical ICL has all the features to meet the requirements for medical imagining but they can ensure that their interface is more intuitive and easy to use.
Read full review
Dassault Systemes
I think this is a great tool overall. We aren't using all of the available features of the system (we don't use the system for EDC or site payments for example), so I can't comment on anything other than study and site management
Read full review
Pros
Bioclinica
  • The system is very easy to use by the end user. Uploading of images by the site is a very streamlined process
  • BioClinica has the capability to centrally read the CT scan images by their own internal radiologist for consistency purposes
  • BioClinica has a very good customer service and helpline
Read full review
Dassault Systemes
  • Study and site creation and management
  • Task management
  • Tracking key study milestones
  • Reporting
Read full review
Cons
Bioclinica
  • Report generating should be more robust and up to date. Clinical trial sites receive multiple queries for the same images even after the sites have responded to the same query.
  • The webiste to upload images by the site is good but I have used other similar software which is more intuitive and easy to maneuver.
Read full review
Dassault Systemes
  • Setting up ad hoc reports isn't very intuitive
  • System performance issues
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
Bioclinica
Parexel also has the capability to collect medical images in a central repository database. Parexel's uploading website is very intuitive and very easy to use. BioClinica can easily ensure that their uploading website is more user-friendly and the interface is easy to understand. Overall Bioclinica ICL is a very good option for pharmaceutical or biotechnology companies.
Read full review
Dassault Systemes
No answers on this topic
Return on Investment
Bioclinica
  • BioClinica ICL was able to meet our protocol and study design to create a central repository of all the images collected by the sites
  • It ensured timely filling of study data to regulatory by ensuring the images data are submitted to regulatory authority as supporting documents
  • It ensured that sites were able to upload imagining documents without extra burden on them
Read full review
Dassault Systemes
  • Improved productivity
  • Improved transparency
  • No longer having to use multiple trackers to manage key study details and metrics
Read full review
ScreenShots