TrustRadius

BlazeMeter vs. Broadcom Service Virtualization vs. Citrus Framework

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
BlazeMeter
Score 8.0 out of 10
N/A
The BlazeMeter Continuous Testing Platform is a unified, end-to-end, next-generation software test automation platform built for both Agile and COE teams, from Perforce. BlazeMeter includes complete continuous testing capabilities deeply integrated into a single, intuitive workflow.
$199
per month
Broadcom Service Virtualization
Score 10.0 out of 10
N/A
Broadcom offers Service Virtualization, simulating unavailable systems across the software development lifecycle (SDLC), allowing developers, testers, integration, and performance teams to work in parallel for faster delivery and higher application quality and reliability.N/A
Citrus Framework
Score 0.0 out of 10
N/A
The Citrus Framework is a base framework for automated integration tests. It provides integration with multiple transports such as Apache Kafka, Http REST, JMS, TCP/IP, SOAP, FTP, SSH, XML, JSON, etc. One single test is able to act as both client and server on several messaging interfaces. Citrus provides validation of XML, Json and plaintext message content and integrates with Spring features such as security, database connectivity, producer and consumer…N/A
Pricing
BlazeMeterBroadcom Service VirtualizationCitrus Framework
Editions & Modules
Basic
$149.00
per month
Pro
$649.00
per month
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
BlazeMeterBroadcom Service VirtualizationCitrus Framework
Free Trial
NoNoNo
Free/Freemium Version
YesNoYes
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details———
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
BlazeMeterBroadcom Service VirtualizationCitrus Framework
Features
BlazeMeterBroadcom Service VirtualizationCitrus Framework
Automation Testing
Comparison of Automation Testing features of Product A and Product B
BlazeMeter
9.0
1 Ratings
7% above category average
Broadcom Service Virtualization
-
Ratings
Citrus Framework
-
Ratings
CI/CD Tool Integration9.01 Ratings00 Ratings00 Ratings
Integrated Version Control9.01 Ratings00 Ratings00 Ratings
Data-Driven Testing9.01 Ratings00 Ratings00 Ratings
Testing Collaboration9.01 Ratings00 Ratings00 Ratings
Testing Reports & Analytics9.01 Ratings00 Ratings00 Ratings
Best Alternatives
BlazeMeterBroadcom Service VirtualizationCitrus Framework
Small Businesses
BrowserStack
BrowserStack
Score 8.5 out of 10

No answers on this topic

No answers on this topic

Medium-sized Companies
ReadyAPI
ReadyAPI
Score 6.2 out of 10
ReadyAPI
ReadyAPI
Score 6.2 out of 10
ReadyAPI
ReadyAPI
Score 6.2 out of 10
Enterprises
ignio AIOps
ignio AIOps
Score 8.1 out of 10
ReadyAPI
ReadyAPI
Score 6.2 out of 10
ReadyAPI
ReadyAPI
Score 6.2 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
BlazeMeterBroadcom Service VirtualizationCitrus Framework
Likelihood to Recommend
9.0
(5 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
BlazeMeterBroadcom Service VirtualizationCitrus Framework
Likelihood to Recommend
Perforce Software
It is well suited for applications that are mission-critical or applications that can receive high traffic/transactions at unscheduled time periods. Using the load testing feature of BlazeMeter, we can test and ascertain the capacity of the application without the drawbacks of the usual Apache JMeter load testing which depends heavily on the host system from where the load testing is performed.
Verified User
Anonymous
Read full review
Broadcom
No answers on this topic
Open Source
No answers on this topic
Pros
Perforce Software
  • BlazeMeter takes the .jmx script that teams had written for JMeter. The transition from JMeter to BlazeMeter was seamless.
  • BlazeMeter offers its own cloud and hence we did not have to set it up on-premise.
  • BlazeMeter hits our application from various geographic locations that simulates real life users.
Verified User
Anonymous
Read full review
Broadcom
No answers on this topic
Open Source
No answers on this topic
Cons
Perforce Software
  • Blazemeter reporting is very basic and shallow. There is no way to drill down or correlate. I can get better reports by using JMeter for free.
  • Blazemeter is very costly. Testing with volumes of more than 1K cu is expensive, and can be done for much cheaper if a company/team is willing to invest a bit of time to figure out how to use cloud instances and jmeter slaves, and to write a basic script to collect resulting xml output.
Verified User
Anonymous
Read full review
Broadcom
No answers on this topic
Open Source
No answers on this topic
Usability
Perforce Software
Easy to setup to do API Performance Testing. Dashboard to showcase results Capability to showcase runtime results
AG
Alok Gupta
Manager System
Read full review
Broadcom
No answers on this topic
Open Source
No answers on this topic
Alternatives Considered
Perforce Software
In comparison with Blazemeter the closes competitor is JMeter but it has disadvantages like it is not a tool that can be use as a collaborative tool and works locally in a computer, Blazemeter is in the web so different people can access and run tests or collaborate do add, edit or delete the existent scripts.
Verified User
Anonymous
Read full review
Broadcom
No answers on this topic
Open Source
No answers on this topic
Return on Investment
Perforce Software
  • It helped positively by helping to identify the maximum capacity needed for high traffic periods
  • Saved revenue by eliminating unwanted duplication of systems
Verified User
Anonymous
Read full review
Broadcom
No answers on this topic
Open Source
No answers on this topic
ScreenShots