TrustRadius

BlazeMeter vs. WireMock

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
BlazeMeter
Score 8.0 out of 10
N/A
The BlazeMeter Continuous Testing Platform is a unified, end-to-end, next-generation software test automation platform built for both Agile and COE teams, from Perforce. BlazeMeter includes complete continuous testing capabilities deeply integrated into a single, intuitive workflow.
$149
per month
WireMock
Score 6.0 out of 10
N/A
WireMock is a simulator for HTTP-based APIs. Some might consider it a service virtualization tool or a mock server. It enables the user to stay productive when an API one depends on doesn't exist or isn't complete. It supports testing of edge cases and failure modes that the real API won't reliably produce. The solution is designed to be fast, to reduce the user's build time from hours down to minutes. WireMock can be run from within a Java application, JUnit test, Servlet…N/A
Pricing
BlazeMeterWireMock
Editions & Modules
Basic
$149.00
per month
Pro
$649.00
per month
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
BlazeMeterWireMock
Free Trial
NoNo
Free/Freemium Version
YesNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details——
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
BlazeMeterWireMock
Considered Both Products
BlazeMeter
Verified User
Anonymous
Chose BlazeMeter
BlazeMeter scores well against Apache JMeter in one Key point , the load generation from different cloud based systems. This helps to measure the capacity of the the application in a transparent way and not bogged down by the capacity of the system from where the test is …
Verified User
Anonymous
Chose BlazeMeter
In comparison with Blazemeter the closes competitor is JMeter but it has disadvantages like it is not a tool that can be use as a collaborative tool and works locally in a computer, Blazemeter is in the web so different people can access and run tests or collaborate do add, …
Verified User
Anonymous
Chose BlazeMeter
BlazeMeter integrates better with a continuous delivery pipeline than SOASTA did.
Verified User
Anonymous
Chose BlazeMeter
Personally, I prefer using JMeter + Redline13, however we had some business folks that wanted to be able to run a few of their own tests. The non-technical individuals preferred to use Blazemeter because of its simple and intuitive UI.
WireMock

No answer on this topic

Features
BlazeMeterWireMock
Automation Testing
Comparison of Automation Testing features of Product A and Product B
BlazeMeter
9.0
Ratings
7% above category average
WireMock
-
Ratings
CI/CD Tool Integration9.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Integrated Version Control9.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Data-Driven Testing9.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Testing Collaboration9.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Testing Reports & Analytics9.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Best Alternatives
BlazeMeterWireMock
Small Businesses
BrowserStack
BrowserStack
Score 8.4 out of 10

No answers on this topic

Medium-sized Companies
ReadyAPI
ReadyAPI
Score 6.1 out of 10
ReadyAPI
ReadyAPI
Score 6.1 out of 10
Enterprises
ignio AIOps
ignio AIOps
Score 8.1 out of 10
ReadyAPI
ReadyAPI
Score 6.1 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
BlazeMeterWireMock
Likelihood to Recommend
9.0
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
BlazeMeterWireMock
Likelihood to Recommend
It is good for measurements of performance testing. It can be used to run API testing. I can not use this for monitoring but it can be used as a complement for monitoring tools (like Catchpoint or New Relic). It can help to produce load on your site and monitor.
Verified User
Anonymous
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Pros
  • Blazemeter has very intuitive and uncluttered UI. It is very easy for a beginner to figure out and get started.
  • Blazemeter allows several methods of creating performance tests - using several popular open source applications. Therefore most often there is no need to learn to use a new tool or language.
Verified User
Anonymous
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Cons
  • BlazeMeter should not require the purchase of 2 dedicated IPs for each suite of performance tests.
  • BlazeMeter should make custom packages cheaper than they are today when purchased for an enterprise and should include dedicated IPs in the package.
  • BlazeMerer should have integration with Jenkins Pipeline 2.0.
Verified User
Anonymous
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Usability
Easy to setup to do API Performance Testing. Dashboard to showcase results Capability to showcase runtime results
AG
Alok Gupta
Manager System
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Alternatives Considered
BlazeMeter scores well against Apache JMeter in one Key point , the load generation from different cloud based systems. This helps to measure the capacity of the the application in a transparent way and not bogged down by the capacity of the system from where the test is executed (in this case Apache JMeter)
Verified User
Anonymous
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Return on Investment
  • BlazeMerter helped performance tests run on their cloud, thereby diminishing our on-prem setup costs tremendously.
  • BlazeMeter pings our application from several geographical locations, thereby simulating real life users.
  • BlazeMeter offers dedicated IPs so that firewall issues can be bypassed.
Verified User
Anonymous
Read full review
No answers on this topic
ScreenShots