bVPN vs. Cisco Meraki vMX

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
bVPN
Score 0.0 out of 10
N/A
N/AN/A
Cisco Meraki vMX
Score 8.6 out of 10
N/A
Cisco's Meraki Virtual MX (vMX) is a virtual instance of a Meraki security & SD-WAN appliance, dedicated specifically to providing the simple configuration benefits of site-to-site Auto VPN for customers running or migrating IT services to an Amazon Web Services or Microsoft Azure Virtual Private Cloud (VPC).N/A
Pricing
bVPNCisco Meraki vMX
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
bVPNCisco Meraki vMX
Free Trial
NoNo
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
bVPNCisco Meraki vMX
Features
bVPNCisco Meraki vMX
Virtual Private Network
Comparison of Virtual Private Network features of Product A and Product B
bVPN
-
Ratings
Cisco Meraki vMX
8.7
7 Ratings
1% below category average
AES 256-bit Encryption00 Ratings9.77 Ratings
Kill Switch00 Ratings10.01 Ratings
Multi-Platform Support00 Ratings8.05 Ratings
Split Tunneling00 Ratings7.85 Ratings
IP Address Masking00 Ratings8.34 Ratings
No-Logs Policy00 Ratings6.62 Ratings
Multiple Server Locations00 Ratings9.05 Ratings
Simultaneous Connections00 Ratings9.76 Ratings
Customer Support Services00 Ratings9.46 Ratings
Best Alternatives
bVPNCisco Meraki vMX
Small Businesses
Norton 360
Norton 360
Score 7.2 out of 10
Norton 360
Norton 360
Score 7.2 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
Quantum Firewalls and Security Gateways
Quantum Firewalls and Security Gateways
Score 9.2 out of 10
Quantum Firewalls and Security Gateways
Quantum Firewalls and Security Gateways
Score 9.2 out of 10
Enterprises
Quantum Firewalls and Security Gateways
Quantum Firewalls and Security Gateways
Score 9.2 out of 10
Quantum Firewalls and Security Gateways
Quantum Firewalls and Security Gateways
Score 9.2 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
bVPNCisco Meraki vMX
Likelihood to Recommend
-
(0 ratings)
8.8
(10 ratings)
Product Scalability
-
(0 ratings)
9.1
(10 ratings)
User Testimonials
bVPNCisco Meraki vMX
Likelihood to Recommend
bVPN
No answers on this topic
Cisco
I think for us in our deployment model where it spoke to the hub, it certainly makes ideal sense. I would probably say with anyone that's signed in Azure or a cloud platform, obviously VMX appliance may not be suited. Anyone on Old Legacy MPLS may struggle to see a purpose for SD-WAN overlay of the top. But I think if you really want to introduce network communications that are low cost effective, solid in terms of availability and performance, a Meraki sdwan solution with the VMX appliance in the cloud is ideal.
Read full review
Pros
bVPN
No answers on this topic
Cisco
  • It handles load really well.
  • It brings simplification to the whole piece of networking network, so it makes it simple for us to diagnose and troubleshoot issues put in place as changes.
  • It has pretty good site to site firewall control.
  • It works well in Azure, so it ticks all our boxes.
Read full review
Cons
bVPN
No answers on this topic
Cisco
  • Client VPN: Cisco Meraki vMX in general needs to implement multiple VPN profiles/ group policies for client VPN
  • Alerts: Cisco Meraki vMX in general should be more consistent in sending alerts. We should receive alarms instantly.
  • Event logs: More in-depth event logs for all Meraki products, such as system crashes, etc.
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
bVPN
No answers on this topic
Cisco
Cisco Meraki vMX is great for small to medium businesses. It is easy to use with little out-of-the-box configuration. There is an easier learning curve on the Cisco Meraki vMX than on the SonicWall devices. We went with the Cisco Meraki vMX because we had the physical appliances already in place and the virtual appliance tied into our system seamlessly.
Read full review
Scalability
bVPN
No answers on this topic
Cisco
This question is hard. A chain of retail or gas stations hypothetically that have simple networks in nature would flourish and scale quite well with Meraki. A chain of banks or something more complex that has more complex requirements doesn't scale very well or at least presents many caveats. Routing has always been a big setup with Meraki but I've always managed to 'get by'.
Read full review
Return on Investment
bVPN
No answers on this topic
Cisco
  • Standardizing: We can use the same "template" setup for multiple customers
  • Management: Easy to manage along with the rest of the Meraki products
  • Stability: Using Cisco Meraki vMX instead of VNGs in Azure provides better stability with auto-VPN between the Cisco Meraki vMX and other networks
Read full review
ScreenShots