Cisco Meraki vMX

Cisco Meraki vMX

Cisco Meraki vMX

23 Reviews and Ratings

Overview
Product	Rating	Most Used By	Product Summary	Starting Price
Cisco Meraki vMX	Score 8.6 out of 10	N/A	Cisco's Meraki Virtual MX (vMX) is a virtual instance of a Meraki security & SD-WAN appliance, dedicated specifically to providing the simple configuration benefits of site-to-site Auto VPN for customers running or migrating IT services to an Amazon Web Services or Microsoft Azure Virtual Private Cloud (VPC).	N/A

Pricing

Cisco Meraki vMX

Editions & Modules

No answers on this topic

Offerings

Pricing Offerings
Cisco Meraki vMX
Free Trial
No
Free/Freemium Version
No
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
No

Entry-level Setup Fee

No setup fee

Additional Details

—

More Pricing Information

Community Pulse
	Cisco Meraki vMX
Considered Both Products	Cisco Meraki vMX DF David Fenech ICT Manager for infrastructure and Service Delivery Chose Cisco Meraki vMX In terms of the Cisco suite, we also have Cisco Webex Calling IP deck solution right out across our centers. That has proven to be phenomenal in terms of performance and stability. With that alone, we've cut back our incident rate of telephony related issues by half … Incentivized Helpful? Verified User Engineer Chose Cisco Meraki vMX The VMware SD wan does give some better WAN metrics, but the interface is super clunky and doesn’t support a full stack. If Meraki could give some more QoE link metrics, it would be perfect. Incentivized Helpful? Verified User Administrator Chose Cisco Meraki vMX Cisco Meraki vMX is great for small to medium businesses. It is easy to use with little out-of-the-box configuration. There is an easier learning curve on the Cisco Meraki vMX than on the SonicWall devices. We went with the Cisco Meraki vMX because we had the physical … Incentivized Helpful? Verified User C-Level Executive Chose Cisco Meraki vMX Meraki vMX is the most simple and intuitive platform to implement. It does though miss some security features that you get in Checkpoint CloudGuard og Palo Alto Next Generation firewalls. Incentivized Helpful? Verified User Engineer Chose Cisco Meraki vMX Cisco Meraki vMX is fantastic. The only downside is cost. Licensing really is a crutch here. Incentivized Helpful? Verified User Consultant Chose Cisco Meraki vMX SD-WAN AutoVPN and price. Incentivized Helpful? Matt Painter, CASP CCNP Sr. Network Engineer Chose Cisco Meraki vMX I've used the FortiGate VM appliance many times and this was much better to use, it was a full feature set and had no setbacks ever. But people use Meraki for different reasons likely so it's not 100% apples to apples. As an SR engineer, I demand deep feature sets, etc, while … Incentivized Helpful?

Features

Cisco Meraki vMX

Virtual Private Network

Comparison of Virtual Private Network features of Product A and Product B
	Cisco Meraki vMX 8.7 7 Ratings 1% below category average
AES 256-bit Encryption	9.77 Ratings
Kill Switch	10.01 Ratings
Multi-Platform Support	7.85 Ratings
Split Tunneling	7.95 Ratings
IP Address Masking	8.24 Ratings
No-Logs Policy	6.62 Ratings
Multiple Server Locations	9.05 Ratings
Simultaneous Connections	9.76 Ratings
Customer Support Services	9.46 Ratings

Best Alternatives
	Cisco Meraki vMX
Small Businesses	Norton 360 Score 7.1 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies	Quantum Firewalls and Security Gateways Score 9.3 out of 10
Enterprises	Quantum Firewalls and Security Gateways Score 9.3 out of 10
All Alternatives	View all alternatives

User Ratings
	Cisco Meraki vMX
Likelihood to Recommend	8.9 (10 ratings)
Product Scalability	9.1 (10 ratings)

User Testimonials
	Cisco Meraki vMX
Likelihood to Recommend	Cisco I think for us in our deployment model where it spoke to the hub, it certainly makes ideal sense. I would probably say with anyone that's signed in Azure or a cloud platform, obviously VMX appliance may not be suited. Anyone on Old Legacy MPLS may struggle to see a purpose for SD-WAN overlay of the top. But I think if you really want to introduce network communications that are low cost effective, solid in terms of availability and performance, a Meraki sdwan solution with the VMX appliance in the cloud is ideal. Incentivized DF David Fenech ICT Manager for infrastructure and Service Delivery Read full review
Pros	Cisco Works well with physical Meraki MX devices Site-to-Site VPNs are easy to set up with other Meraki devices Cisco Meraki vMX provides a great solution for a virtual environment, like Azure Incentivized Verified User Anonymous Read full review
Cons	Cisco Client VPN: Cisco Meraki vMX in general needs to implement multiple VPN profiles/ group policies for client VPN Alerts: Cisco Meraki vMX in general should be more consistent in sending alerts. We should receive alarms instantly. Event logs: More in-depth event logs for all Meraki products, such as system crashes, etc. Incentivized Malte Bredevang Zielinski Network and Security Consultant Read full review
Alternatives Considered	Cisco The VMware SD wan does give some better WAN metrics, but the interface is super clunky and doesn’t support a full stack. If Meraki could give some more QoE link metrics, it would be perfect. Incentivized Verified User Anonymous Read full review
Scalability	Cisco We have over 350 locations and growing. We chose Cisco Meraki vMX because of ease of use and how it scales. Incentivized Verified User Anonymous Read full review
Return on Investment	Cisco Some users it knocks down on maintenance labor/cost Negative would be if you didn't really vet the feature set to the customers needs and end up having to replace it short notice. Incentivized Matt Painter, CASP CCNP Sr. Network Engineer Read full review
ScreenShots