TrustRadius: an HG Insights company

Save this comparison

Save this comparison

Add Product

Recommended Comparisons

    Overview
    ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price

    CA Workload Automation

    Score7.5 out of 10
    N/AAs the name may suggest, CA Workload Automation is CA Technologies workload automation offering.N/A

    HashiCorp Nomad

    Score8 out of 10
    N/ANomad, from HashiCorp, is presented as a simple, flexible, and production-grade workload orchestrator that enables organizations to deploy, manage, and scale any application, containerized, legacy or batch jobs, across multiple regions, on private and public clouds. Nomad's workload support enables an organization to run containerized, non containerized, and batch applications through a single workflow. Nomad is available open source, or via a supported enterprise plan.N/A
    Pricing
    CA Workload AutomationHashiCorp Nomad
    Editions & Modules
    No answers on this topic
    No answers on this topic
    Offerings
    Pricing Offerings
    CA Workload AutomationHashiCorp Nomad
    Free Trial
    NoNo
    Free/Freemium Version
    NoYes
    Premium Consulting/Integration Services
    NoNo
    Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
    Additional Details——
    More Pricing Information
    Features
    CA Workload AutomationHashiCorp Nomad
    Workload Automation
    Comparison of Workload Automation features of CA Workload Automation and HashiCorp Nomad
    Feature
    CA Workload Automation
    9.6
    5 Ratings
    15% above category average
    HashiCorp Nomad
    -
    Ratings
    Multi-platform scheduling10.05 Ratings00 Ratings
    Central monitoring10.05 Ratings00 Ratings
    Logging10.05 Ratings00 Ratings
    Alerts and notifications9.74 Ratings00 Ratings
    Analysis and visualization8.84 Ratings00 Ratings
    Application integration8.94 Ratings00 Ratings
    Best Alternatives
    CA Workload AutomationHashiCorp Nomad
    Small Businesses
    No answers on this topic
    Mirantis Kubernetes Engine
    Score8 out of 10
    Medium-sized Companies
    Apache Airflow
    Score8.7 out of 10
    Amazon Elastic Container Service (Amazon ECS)
    Score8.6 out of 10
    Enterprises
    Redwood RunMyJobs
    Score9.7 out of 10
    SUSE Rancher
    Score9.4 out of 10
    All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
    User Ratings
    CA Workload AutomationHashiCorp Nomad
    Likelihood to Recommend
    10.0
    (5 ratings)
    10.0
    (1 ratings)
    Usability
    10.0
    (2 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    Support Rating
    9.7
    (2 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    User Testimonials
    CA Workload AutomationHashiCorp Nomad
    Likelihood to Recommend
    Broadcom
    CA Workload Automation is well suited for firms having to manage and monitor multiple applications operating in multiple environments. and having SLA requirements. CA Workload Automation is less appropriate and not cost-effective for non-critical applications and/or jobs. CA Workload Automation is ideal for companies that require reliable and stable Production support for their business critical jobs to finish on time.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    IBM
    Nomad is well suited for organizations who wish to tackle the problem of cloud computing with as little opinion as possible. Where competing tools like Kubernetes limit the concept of "batteries included," Nomad relies on engineers understanding the missing components and filling them in as necessary. The benefit of Nomad is the ability to build a system out of small pieces with the cost of having more complexity at a system level compared to alternatives.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Pros
    Broadcom
    • All batch jobs can be monitored from one dashboard.
    • Provides detailed error logs.
    • We have developed packages to invoke OIC integrations through Autosys.
    • Notifications is a good feature when job fails or runs beyond cutoff time.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    IBM
    • Nomad is incredibly simple by nature, following the Linux philosophy of doing one thing great. That one thing for Nomad is job scheduling.
    • Nomad is a modern tool, written in Go with a large community and maintained by HashiCorp.
    • Implementation of Nomad is very simple since it is a single binary.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Cons
    Broadcom
    • Monitoring of front-end websites.
    • More utilization insights if possible.
    • Customer service via chat in the future if possible.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    IBM
    • Nomad only handles one part of a full platform. Expertise and vision are required in implementing an entire system that is functional enough for an organization to rely on. This includes other tools to handle things like secrets, service discovery, network routing, etc.
    • Nomad is delayed in some modern functionality, like features for service-mesh and open tracing. These features are on the tool's roadmap, but there's currently no native support. These paradigms can be established still, but require more expertise outside of Nomad itself.
    • Nomad is not the leading tool for this space, and as such risks being left behind by tools with much greater support, such as Kubernetes.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Usability
    Broadcom
    This product along with the Broadcom support team fits out needs and scheduling requirements with no issues. The support team are very aware of their product and how to support it.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    IBM
    No answers on this topic
    Support Rating
    Broadcom
    I love this product!!
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    IBM
    No answers on this topic
    Alternatives Considered
    Broadcom
    We selected CA Workload Automation for the ease of integration and less time to setup. It has less overhead to manage the application and is a very robust application.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    IBM
    Nomad's primary competitor is Kubernetes, specifically its scheduling component. Kubernetes is a much more complete system that will handle more things than job scheduling, including service discovery, secrets management, and service routing. There also exists a much larger community support for Kubernetes vs Nomad. One might say Kubernetes is the safer choice between the two. Kubernetes is the complete "operating system" for cloud computing, but with it includes complexities that are "Kubernetes" specific. The decision really comes down to a mindset of monolith vs components. With Kubernetes, I would argue you choose the entire system as a whole. With Nomad, you design your system piece by piece. There is no wrong answer.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Return on Investment
    Broadcom
    • CA Workload Automation has improved SLA by 50%.
    • CA Workload Automation has reduced job failures by 60%.
    • CA Workload Automation has improved staff productivity and problem resolution.
    • CA Workload Automation has improved application availability.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    IBM
    • Nomad has allowed our organization to deploy quicker and more frequently with a lower failure rate.
    • Nomad has brought in consistency from an operations perspective.
    • Nomad's performance allows us to scale infinitely while providing functionality that reduces mean time to repair (canary deploys, versioning, rollbacks, etc).
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    ScreenShots