Calendar vs. Microsoft Office 2016 (discontinued)

Calendar has a lot of useful functions crammed into its simple UI. It works flawlessly with Gmail's calendar, and I appreciate how easy it is to keep track of all of my booked appointments. I strongly advise this to anyone who are having trouble finding open hours in their busy work schedulesand to everyone who wants to be more productive in general. The analytics are the finest part. I've never seen a calendar software that can show me who I spend the most time with before. It appears that they are more concerned with time management and efficiency than with day planning!"

Incentivized

It is quite suitable for daily work in almost any job. Although now there are more advanced tools, found online in the cloud, it is still a good option for daily work. I highly recommend it as it has always been a reliable tool. The problem would be the support since it is a tool that is discontinued.

Incentivized

• Makes Scheduling Easy and Better
• Keeps Calendars organized in one place
• Analytics of how much time we have spent on it

Incentivized

• Consistent functionality across the several Office components. This consistency is a great advantage for adoptions of other unused Office components. For example, if you want to publish a book that you have done with Word, you don't need to relearn new menu positions, new file-related actions, new reviewing procedures, etc.
• Functionality extensions with Add-ins. This has always been a nameplate for Microsoft and Office keeps its tradition. I remember the renowned Bill Gates phrase when Visual Basic has been presented to him, he said: "Make it extensible". So, for example, I use Grammarly to improve my translations and there are thousands of Add-ins that you can purchase to increase your productivity.
• Continuous improvement of online Office 365 allows for comprehensive usage from any platform, like Apple or Android tablets, Mac or Windows, cell phones and more. Every day and regular user's functions are there. And if you need extensive reviewing capabilities or programming, you can always rely on the desktop version.
• Spelling and translate for multiple languages are now included in the online version. I should indeed rely more on the online version.

Incentivized

• The user interface may be made better.
• Integration with other services might be improved.
• Occasionally puzzling, but nothing a quick internet search can't sort out.

Incentivized

• Office 2016 professional edition can be priced for a single user license, it would be nice to see a drop in the pricing.
• Office 2016 home edition is a better price but does not include outlook 2016, so it is not a good fit for the workplace environments.
• Office 2016 can run slowly on older systems, so you need to make sure you have a machine that is 4 years old or less for it to run smoothly.

Incentivized

We believe that office 2016 offers the best value when it comes to features included out of the box. The software is used in its entirety by our organization and is easily supported by our staff of IT technicians. Users find this software to be easy to learn and easy to use with minimal learning curve.

Incentivized

It's fairly easy to use, but the automatic formatting or capturing of formatting when pasting is wonky - especially when there are outlines or other bullets/numbered lists. Fixing and sizing up tables can be annoying, and there are sometimes formatting issues that we just absolutely cannot fix for some reason

Incentivized

Microsoft support is very good, big corporation has people for everything. You can find a lot of solutions to problems and helpful tutorials, as well as ready to be copied macros and functions made by communities around the world. Very big user base means there aren't situations that someone else didn't have already

Incentivized

They are almost copy of each other, Calendar is the first one so I think it is a bit better.

Incentivized

We have always used Microsoft Office products, beginning with the older versions, but we did try a brief evaluation of OpenOffice from Apache. Even though that open source software is free, it's got certain limitations and a different functionality that was missing from Office2016, so we decided not to pursue that path.

Incentivized

• Everything is positive, there isn't anything negative as such.
• It has helped us to save time & inturn this helps organisatuon to achieve better ROI.
• This has helped to save company cost on in-house meetings.

Incentivized

• For the user groups that use Office in our organization, they would find it difficult to work without it. Decades of development are hard to just walk away from.
• Office products are considered standard. When sharing data, there is almost never a question of "What format would you like that file in"?
• For the price of convenience at this time, licensing fees are priced where we don't feel that we are not getting what we paid for.

Incentivized