Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Canonical OpenStack
Score 9.0 out of 10
N/A
Canonical OpenStack is the cloud openstack option from Canonical in the UK. Using private and public cloud infrastructure at the same time allows users to optimise CapEx and OpEx costs. Users can create cost-effective, enterprise-grade public cloud infrastructure on Ubuntu.
$7,500
one-time fee
Cisco ACI
Score 8.5 out of 10
N/A
Cisco Application Centric Infrastructure (ACI) is network virtualization technology.N/A
VMware NSX
Score 8.7 out of 10
N/A
VMware NSX is network virtualization technology. VMware NSX is no longer sold as a standalone product and is now available as a part of VMware Cloud Foundation.N/A
Pricing
Canonical OpenStackCisco Application Centric Infrastructure (Cisco ACI)VMware NSX
Editions & Modules
Private Cloud Build
$75,000
fixed price
Private Cloud Build Plus
$150,000
fixed price
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Canonical OpenStackCisco ACIVMware NSX
Free Trial
NoNoNo
Free/Freemium Version
NoNoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional DetailsAdditional features, functionality, and integrations are available via add-ons
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Canonical OpenStackCisco Application Centric Infrastructure (Cisco ACI)VMware NSX
Considered Multiple Products
Canonical OpenStack

No answer on this topic

Cisco ACI
Chose Cisco Application Centric Infrastructure (Cisco ACI)
An alternative to ACI would be to use VMware NSX-T. The advantage of NSX-T is that the micro-segmentation is implemented with a distributed firewall and not with ACL. The disadvantages are that you would still need an additional pyhsical network as underlay that has to be …
Chose Cisco Application Centric Infrastructure (Cisco ACI)
The main reason we decided to go with Cisco ACI over VMware NSX was that with ACI we could still connect physical networks, therefore, utilizing ACI as our complete data center switching platform. NSX was really only a solution for virtualized networks.
Chose Cisco Application Centric Infrastructure (Cisco ACI)
Cisco ACI is more a complementary solution to separate the underlay and overlay network than VMware NSX.
Chose Cisco Application Centric Infrastructure (Cisco ACI)
Cisco Application Centric Infrastructure sits well with other stack of Cisco products
Chose Cisco Application Centric Infrastructure (Cisco ACI)
It’s native support to applications through Application centric mode it’s attractive when deploying in a private cloud environment and it’s ease integration to compute/VMM resources allows the deployment procedure to be much efficient. Also Cisco is a lead in the market that …
Chose Cisco Application Centric Infrastructure (Cisco ACI)
Line level policy & secured versus software based.
Chose Cisco Application Centric Infrastructure (Cisco ACI)
NSX-T and ACI both are definitely awesome products. I tend to use ACI in networks that have more barebone and/or alternative hypervisors. NSX still works best in VMware heavy networks. Another consideration is where the network is managed, by which team. If the network is …
Chose Cisco Application Centric Infrastructure (Cisco ACI)
NSX works well as an overlay technology where ACI in combination with secure workload provide a better overall solution
Chose Cisco Application Centric Infrastructure (Cisco ACI)
Compared to NSX, Cisco ACI has a lot to offer out-of-the-box without the need to use extra tools or products that need to be installed.
Chose Cisco Application Centric Infrastructure (Cisco ACI)
With Cisco ACI you get a solution with a single vendor, NSX is only software, so the physical layer will always have to be from another vendor.
Chose Cisco Application Centric Infrastructure (Cisco ACI)
Enable full automation of physical and virtual network.
Legacy network devices can be physically connected to the fabric.
Hardware routing is much more efficient than a software only network.
Chose Cisco Application Centric Infrastructure (Cisco ACI)
Cisco ACI is better since it provides more common solutions than vendor specific solutions
Chose Cisco Application Centric Infrastructure (Cisco ACI)
Cisco is Cisco. You have the ecosystem and you have end-to-end technology line-up and the integrations against the rest of the portfolio. No other vender has broad view.
Chose Cisco Application Centric Infrastructure (Cisco ACI)
NSX is much easier to use but is expensive and the VMware teams usually do not want to support it.
VMware NSX
Chose VMware NSX
We use both Cisco ACI and VMware NSX, and while they have different strengths and capabilities, I would recommend VMware NSX, as it can be used in all VMware environments, without costly physical infrastructure changes. Cisco ACI provides some of the same capabilities, but not …
Chose VMware NSX
We use both ACI & NSX. They both provide a programmable network and in future releases of ACI they will allow you to stretch fabrics into the cloud like you can do with NSX. ACI, when compared to NSX, turned out to be significantly cheaper, but it also was lacking certain …
Best Alternatives
Canonical OpenStackCisco Application Centric Infrastructure (Cisco ACI)VMware NSX
Small Businesses

No answers on this topic

No answers on this topic

No answers on this topic

Medium-sized Companies

No answers on this topic

Cisco Catalyst Center
Cisco Catalyst Center
Score 8.5 out of 10

No answers on this topic

Enterprises

No answers on this topic

Cisco Catalyst Center
Cisco Catalyst Center
Score 8.5 out of 10

No answers on this topic

All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
Canonical OpenStackCisco Application Centric Infrastructure (Cisco ACI)VMware NSX
Likelihood to Recommend
9.0
(2 ratings)
8.6
(94 ratings)
7.0
(3 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
-
(0 ratings)
10.0
(6 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Usability
-
(0 ratings)
7.1
(7 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Availability
-
(0 ratings)
9.1
(2 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Performance
-
(0 ratings)
9.1
(9 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Support Rating
-
(0 ratings)
8.1
(10 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
In-Person Training
-
(0 ratings)
8.2
(1 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Implementation Rating
-
(0 ratings)
8.0
(4 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Product Scalability
-
(0 ratings)
8.6
(9 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Vendor post-sale
-
(0 ratings)
5.5
(1 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
Canonical OpenStackCisco Application Centric Infrastructure (Cisco ACI)VMware NSX
Likelihood to Recommend
Canonical Ltd
Ubuntu OpenStack is well suited for startups where there are very tight financial constraints. As Ubuntu OpenStack is open source, the startup organizations will not have to spend a lot when compared to their commercial offerings in the market. Ubuntu OpenStack is less appropriate in organizations where they don't want to have private on-prem clouds. As deploying a private on-prem cloud is a very cumbersome and tedious task, the organizations must have a dedicated team to manage such on-prem deployments.
Read full review
Cisco
The ACI solution is perfectly fit for a large or multi-site data center environment. It permits simplifying deployment, management, automation, and security. ACI is especially valuable when strong scalability, automation, security, and segmentation are required. However, ACI is less suitable for a small environment due to its complexity and high cost.
Read full review
VMware by Broadcom
With proper design, VMware NSX can and should be deployed to virtually any VMware virtualization environment, but the deployment should be tailored to the needs of that environment. There isn't really a one size fits all deployment design for all environments. That versatility is what provides its greatest strength to a business.
Read full review
Pros
Canonical Ltd
  • Very easy to use, learning curve is very short. Don't need to invest months of training before using it
  • Well suited with Jenkins for automated tests
  • Works well on large sets of heterogeneous hardware
Read full review
Cisco
  • Cisco ACI, The object model is very complicated. It's something difficult to understand and also because there is a user interface, there's a web user interface, but it's not optimal to use it because if you want to deploy a large amount of VLAN or a large amount of tenants, it's quite difficult to do it or it's quite challenging. Maybe if you want to configure a large amount of ports using the web interface, it's not appropriate because it takes a lot of time. It also provides APIs to do that, but as I say, the object model is very difficult to understand and there is very little documentation about automation of the ACI and maybe there is but it's not so easy to find.
Read full review
VMware by Broadcom
  • End to end encryption on the wire.
  • Micro-segmentation.
  • Integrates well with existing VMWare environment.
  • Integrates well with our existing network.
Read full review
Cons
Canonical Ltd
  • More customizable options while choosing virtual machine configurations would be great.
  • To have regular online learning sessions directly from Ubuntu OpenStack experts [to] help users and for those who implement it.
  • Giving admin more control on what privileges they can grant to their users.
Read full review
Cisco
  • I think something I've just went to a session with hyper fabric and the ideas that hyper fabric has. Keep it really simple because Cisco ACI is a complex system and adopt some of the ideas behind hyper fabric, bring it to ACI that will be really beneficial. So as I said, automation is a great thing, but it's still, you need to have the background and the really complex stuff that happens behind the scenes to leverage the value of that solution. And by adding more simplicity to it, I think that will be a great thing. And also integrating with other applications in terms of the automation.
Read full review
VMware by Broadcom
  • Interoperability in multi-vendor environments
  • Advanced networking and packet acceleration options can be improved
Read full review
Likelihood to Renew
Canonical Ltd
No answers on this topic
Cisco
Provided with the intensive fault isolation for the CISCO ACI, we are glad that we have this Data Center Solution in place and we will continue to renew as long as the future needed requirements are meet and more helpful features will be enabled in the future with the integration of security
Read full review
VMware by Broadcom
No answers on this topic
Usability
Canonical Ltd
No answers on this topic
Cisco
You'll need a lot of training and hands on experience to get the most out of the product. There are a lot of very useful features in the ACI product. Often times there are a lot of ways to get to a solution for chalanges in the field. The solutions might be different eacht time. Knowing which one to implement is somtimes a challenge.
Read full review
VMware by Broadcom
No answers on this topic
Reliability and Availability
Canonical Ltd
No answers on this topic
Cisco
It allways works. If there are problems with links going down by accident (say someone accidentally unpatches something they shouldn't have), we rarely miss more then one packet over the link. Also, using VPCs we are able to upgrade the software on the switches without the attached EPs ever noticing.
Read full review
VMware by Broadcom
No answers on this topic
Performance
Canonical Ltd
No answers on this topic
Cisco
Day to day operations on Cisco ACI do not require much human intervention, the platform ticks over without any major faults. Being able to rapidly replicate the communication between two groups of machines across multiple sub networks speeds up new application delivery, and the integration into vmWare allows multiple teams within IT to work together to problem solve rapidly.
Read full review
VMware by Broadcom
No answers on this topic
Support Rating
Canonical Ltd
No answers on this topic
Cisco
Cisco provides users and partners with a multitude of data for you to consume. I think that the stuff in the public domain goes a long way to assisting you find any answers you may need, plus insights and information from areas such as DevNet provide you with access to more than just the traditional release notes and the like
Read full review
VMware by Broadcom
No answers on this topic
In-Person Training
Canonical Ltd
No answers on this topic
Cisco
The Cisco ACI training provided by Cisco was in depth, covered all of our requirements, and allowed us to implement and maintain the platform without issues.
Read full review
VMware by Broadcom
No answers on this topic
Implementation Rating
Canonical Ltd
No answers on this topic
Cisco
Being involved in the implmentation gives you more overview on how things are supposed to be working and communicating, you can easily performce troubleshooting and understanding the troubleshooting scenario
Read full review
VMware by Broadcom
No answers on this topic
Alternatives Considered
Canonical Ltd
Everybody knows VMWare which is the world's number one in data center infrastructure management. OpenStack is lot lot less expensive but doesn't offer all the functionalities you have with VMWare especially for High Availability and load balancing. You should go for OpenStack if you need an easy to use solution without the need for external consultants. If you don't have the capacity to manage your own infrastructure you had better go for VMWare.
Read full review
Cisco
Actually we start our learning in networking career with Cisco. So it is very useful or easier to learn this product. And honestly speaking, I didn't work in any other data center solution other than Cisco. So I cannot compare what it gives us more than other popular stuff. But this is very nice product like from Cisco.
Read full review
VMware by Broadcom
We use both Cisco ACI and VMware NSX, and while they have different strengths and capabilities, I would recommend VMware NSX, as it can be used in all VMware environments, without costly physical infrastructure changes. Cisco ACI provides some of the same capabilities, but not all. It's focus relies on physical networking changes.
Read full review
Scalability
Canonical Ltd
No answers on this topic
Cisco
Cisco ACI scales well and is suited in scenarios such as multi-cloud or large data centre implementations. It is not suited to smaller deployments as the efficiencies that it provides are not fully realised. It is well suited in large environments that contain both virtual and bare-metal machines allowing a great deal of flexibility. It is also perfect to support multi-tenancy platforms.
Read full review
VMware by Broadcom
No answers on this topic
Return on Investment
Canonical Ltd
  • Lighter on initial spending for the organization.
  • Deployments which have no vendor locking makes management decisions easier.
  • Support from great community saved lot of time for engineers managing it.
Read full review
Cisco
  • We've definitely spent quite a bit of time relearning how to do things in ACI, but I think the investment has been well worth while considering that we can now deploy tenants and leaves from the ground up in a matter of seconds.
  • We can if we choose to upgrade an entire datacenters worth of switches in a single night. (We've chosen to break it up for availability requirements, but if you didn't require 99.999% uptime like us you may be able to do it)
Read full review
VMware by Broadcom
  • Ability to move workloads more easily with the ability to stretch/move networks across multiple physical locations.
  • The added flexibility allows you to expedite tech refreshes since you're no longer constrained by the hardware.
Read full review
ScreenShots