Carbon Black App Control is an application control product, used to lock down servers and critical systems, prevent unwanted changes and ensure continuous compliance with regulatory mandates.
N/A
IBM InfoSphere Information Server
Score10 out of 10
N/A
IBM InfoSphere Information Server is a data integration platform used to understand, cleanse, monitor and transform data. The offerings provide massively parallel processing (MPP) capabilities.
N/A
Pricing
Carbon Black App Control
IBM InfoSphere Information Server
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Carbon Black App Control
IBM InfoSphere Information Server
Free Trial
No
No
Free/Freemium Version
No
No
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
No
No
Entry-level Setup Fee
No setup fee
No setup fee
Additional Details
—
—
More Pricing Information
Features
Carbon Black App Control
IBM InfoSphere Information Server
Data Source Connection
Comparison of Data Source Connection features of Carbon Black App Control and IBM InfoSphere Information Server
Feature
Carbon Black App Control
-
Ratings
IBM InfoSphere Information Server
8.7
4 Ratings
4% above category average
Connect to traditional data sources
00 Ratings
9.94 Ratings
Connecto to Big Data and NoSQL
00 Ratings
7.54 Ratings
Data Transformations
Comparison of Data Transformations features of Carbon Black App Control and IBM InfoSphere Information Server
Feature
Carbon Black App Control
-
Ratings
IBM InfoSphere Information Server
9.6
4 Ratings
17% above category average
Simple transformations
00 Ratings
10.04 Ratings
Complex transformations
00 Ratings
9.24 Ratings
Data Modeling
Comparison of Data Modeling features of Carbon Black App Control and IBM InfoSphere Information Server
Feature
Carbon Black App Control
-
Ratings
IBM InfoSphere Information Server
8.0
4 Ratings
1% above category average
Data model creation
00 Ratings
8.72 Ratings
Metadata management
00 Ratings
7.74 Ratings
Business rules and workflow
00 Ratings
8.44 Ratings
Collaboration
00 Ratings
8.04 Ratings
Testing and debugging
00 Ratings
7.14 Ratings
Data Governance
Comparison of Data Governance features of Carbon Black App Control and IBM InfoSphere Information Server
Cb Protect is best suited somewhere where you want to maximize the lockdown of workstations. So moving past no local admin rights to blocking specific applications and peripherals. The idea would be to have a list of applications you want to run, and then anything else is not able to be used. As stated prior, if you have a very fluid environment where you are having all sorts of new applications installed frequently (I feel for you!!) this is still do-able, but it misses the general idea. I think especially in environments that are more sensitive to new applications, like banks, healthcare systems etc, this is a good fit. The ability to look at application levels, drift, unapproved software etc is very useful.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
Information Server is extremely useful to replace manual developments that require a lot of coding effort. It significantly increases the productivity of the initial development and the future maintenance of the processes since it has a visual development environment with self-documentation.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
The big difference between Protect and Barkly/AMP is how exactly it goes about what it's doing. Protect is application whitelisting and program reputation. So the way it's protecting you is using a proprietary reputation service, and hash values to identify applications, and then hitting a list of whitelisted programs to decide if you are able to run that or not, based on the policy you are in. There is a LOT of value in that. We actually are working on transitioning to Cisco Advanced Malware Protection (AMP). The main reason is cost (about the same cost as Cb Protect, but with (most of) the featureset of all 3 Carbon Black products for less than 1/3 of the total spend. AMP works differently, looking at a reputation service powered by Cisco's Talos cloud. You don't really have application whitelisting, but that also reduces how many "requests" you get for applications. So I'll have to find a different way to do whitelisting and USB blocking and the like, but I'm getting more visibility across my network and also built in antivirus (TETRA engine - ClamAV with some work). Barkly is an add that we are looking to put in as it looks at behavior of programs. So specifically it watches for privilege elevation and the like. Thus far all the big name problem children (WannaCry, other ransomware problems) have been caught natively in Barkly day 0.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info