CareerSiteBuilder vs. HiringThing

If you have a job opening or a high turn around rate like we do. (we are a staffing company) [CareerSiteBuilder] is a great place to to start. It is affordable and reaches hundreds of potential employees. When you search resumes sometimes when you enter keywords you have to play around with it to find the right phrasing. Its not difficult just time consuming.

Incentivized

Hiring Thing is great for new organizations just starting out with smaller talent teams. It is very simple to use, add users, walkthrough processes, communicate with candidates, and walk through the hiring process. It does not work as well when an organization grows, needs lots of open requisitions, and has a decentralized hiring process.

Incentivized

• Search features.
• Quantity of resumes.
• The format that the candidates information is presented.

Incentivized

• System navigation
• Posting to website and job boards
• Reviewing applicants quickly

Incentivized

• There are some missing functionalities that could be addressed such as fusing resume search and recruitment edge.

Incentivized

• The support side leaves room for improvement
• The offer letter and onboarding documents often didn't send
• Limited availability for posting

Incentivized

Affordable, quick, easy, super user friendly, well known, offers a large variety of job seekers[.]

Incentivized

• We have been able to present MORE candidates to our clients in the staffing industry, and therefore fill more positions.
• We are able to find MORE QUALIFIED candidates using search features, to in turn fill more direct-hire positions.
• We have to pay or Career Builder for thousands of people, so that takes away from ROI.

Incentivized

• We hired lots of people
• Lots of staff used the system
• It served as a bandaid

Incentivized