CashFlowCockpit vs. Cube

CashFlowCockpit

Cube

Overview
Product	Rating	Most Used By	Product Summary	Starting Price
CashFlowCockpit	Score 0.0 out of 10	N/A	N/A	$39 per month
Cube	Score 9.8 out of 10	N/A	Cube is a financial planning & analysis (FP&A) platform that aims to enable finance teams to be more strategic and positively contribute to company growth activities by spending less time on manual, repetitive task, from Cube Planning headquartered in New York.	N/A

Pricing

CashFlowCockpit

Cube

Editions & Modules

Basic: $39
per month

Enterprise: Contact us

Offerings

Pricing Offerings
CashFlowCockpit	Cube
Free Trial
Yes	No
Free/Freemium Version
No	No
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
No	No

Entry-level Setup Fee

No setup fee

Required

Additional Details

—

More Pricing Information

Community Pulse
	CashFlowCockpit	Cube
Considered Both Products	CashFlowCockpit No answer on this topic	Cube AY Anthony Yang Senior Manager, Strategic Finance Chose Cube Cube lacks a lot of the forecasting and planning capabilities of other FP&A tools in the market, but it excels at providing flexibility in aggregating data from multiple places into a single source of truth and then building reports driven off of that data. Cube is very … Incentivized Helpful? Verified User Anonymous Chose Cube Prefer Cube but mainly due to my new company being early stage start up and moving away from excel was not the answer Incentivized Helpful? CR Charly Rogers Senior FP&A Analyst Chose Cube Cube has an easier implementation and functionality is appropriate, quick-to-learn and a perfect match for an organisation of our scale and growth. There is less flexibility in the reporting & formatting in-built in Cube, and it's a far way off the in-built modelling … Incentivized Helpful? Jacob Barden FP&A Manager Chose Cube Cube is a much cleaner and quicker tool than PowerBI Incentivized Helpful? Verified User Anonymous Chose Cube We needed something that was quick to implement, easy to use, and had a small learning curve. Cube has delivered. Incentivized Helpful? LB Lawson Brown Sr. Director of Finance Chose Cube Cube's ability to create custom reports easily on the fly, fully excel based, and simple to use Incentivized Helpful? Verified User Anonymous Chose Cube Cube was the most flexible while still doing everything we need it to do. Because it is a spreadsheet native platform we could quickly and easily integrate it into the processes we already had. While at the same time learning how Cube worked so that we could fully leverage its … Incentivized Helpful? EK Ethan Kutner Director of Financial Planning and Analysis Chose Cube Cube support team is much more willing to help. Cube product team is adding new features at a faster pace. Cube is more functional within excel. Cube has better version control and general ledger organization. Cube customer service is incredibly helpful and their team is full … Incentivized Helpful? Verified User Anonymous Chose Cube Cube was chosen because of its price, customer support and ease to integrate and learn. my team learned it pretty fast and their customer support team consists of ex-fpa folks so they know the problems that the users deal with on a day to day. they gave us a good plan to … Incentivized Helpful? CR Connor Rainey Senior Accountant Chose Cube Cube was just a lot easier to use than Vena. We took some time to look at Vena as well and while their product was impressive, our organization was not yet there. We needed something we could implement quickly, and in today's day and age I think that is a very important quality … Incentivized Helpful? Andrew DeVito, CPA FP&A Manager Chose Cube Cube is a much simpler and easier to use platform compared to its competitors. The setup was extremely easy, and required almost no help from IT. The big standout difference was the cube support team though. They were available from start to finish when implementing the … Incentivized Helpful? Gregory Bleier, CPA, MBA Controller Chose Cube Ease of use, simple, customized, cost effective, super user friendly, excel based integration, drilldown. Incentivized Helpful? Verified User Anonymous Chose Cube Causal is a much more sophisticated product, but would require that we completely switch away from all of our current models and using google sheets. Cube allowed us to continue operating as is, but with a quicker data connection. Incentivized Helpful? Verified User Anonymous Chose Cube Workday Adaptive Planning was too cumbersome to implement. It was expected to take 6 months to implement it + teething issues. This would be after you know exactly what you want. With our business that is going through significant growth year on year and things rapidly changing, … Incentivized Helpful? Verified User Anonymous Chose Cube 90% of what Hyperion offered Cube offers. Cube is missing the drill down feature which I believe is its biggest flaw. If you have revenue you cant double click on revenue and have it blow out all the revenue accounts at the lowest level. For companies that have hundreds … Incentivized Helpful? AS alex sharpe Sr Finance Manager Chose Cube Cube Planning's ability to integrate with multiple softwares as well as excel and sheets really set it apart from the competition. Incentivized Helpful? Verified User Anonymous Chose Cube I guess Oracle PBCS is more suitable for a larger organization. Thus with a small company lie us that require agile planning and reporting, it's not as good of a fit. Incentivized Helpful? Nicholas Jacoby Senior Director Chose Cube Cube is a much more cost-effective tool that is also much simpler for the business to manage. It does not require an in-house IT team and the admin functionalities are very straightforward. Incentivized Helpful? Verified User Anonymous Chose Cube We switched to Cube because of its ease of use. Adaptive had way too many moving parts and was too restrictive for what we were trying to achieve. With a small Finance team, it was hard to have multiple people be power users of Adaptive vs Cube which was extremely intuitive for … Incentivized Helpful? FM Francisco Meyo Controller Chose Cube Other products are more robust than Cube Planning (Anaplan, Vena) but the price tag is also way higher. Cube Planning provides us with flexibility, customer support, and overall great value for money Incentivized Helpful? Verified User Anonymous Chose Cube I was not a part of the search process but I really like using Cube. Incentivized Helpful? Verified User Anonymous Chose Cube Planful was just a bit too advanced (and costly) for what we needed at this point of our company (much like Adaptive). With those types of platforms, you really do need a consultant to help create the needs specific to your personal business, which ends up adding costs. Causal … Incentivized Helpful? Verified User Anonymous Chose Cube Cube Planning is more flexible and integrates more easily with Google Sheets and Excel. Incentivized Helpful? KD Kristina Delvalle VP of Finance Chose Cube Cube is more affordable than other finance products that are out there. I have also tried Plan Guru, but ran into issues as Plan Guru desktop version was only for PC's and cloud version did not have the same capabilities as the desktop version, so it was a catch-22. Incentivized Helpful? Verified User Anonymous Chose Cube It was the ease of implementation, the speed to be up and running, the competitive price, and the continued support that sold us on Cube compared to other software. Incentivized Helpful?

Features

CashFlowCockpit

Cube

BI Standard Reporting

Comparison of BI Standard Reporting features of Product A and Product B
	CashFlowCockpit - Ratings	Cube 7.5 Ratings 1% below category average
Pixel Perfect reports	00 Ratings	8.90 Ratings
Customizable dashboards	00 Ratings	6.40 Ratings
Report Formatting Templates	00 Ratings	7.30 Ratings

Ad-hoc Reporting

Comparison of Ad-hoc Reporting features of Product A and Product B
	CashFlowCockpit - Ratings	Cube 8.9 Ratings 14% above category average
Drill-down analysis	00 Ratings	9.60 Ratings
Formatting capabilities	00 Ratings	8.40 Ratings
Integration with R or other statistical packages	00 Ratings	8.00 Ratings
Report sharing and collaboration	00 Ratings	9.80 Ratings

Report Output and Scheduling

Comparison of Report Output and Scheduling features of Product A and Product B
	CashFlowCockpit - Ratings	Cube 8.4 Ratings 5% above category average
Publish to Web	00 Ratings	8.20 Ratings
Publish to PDF	00 Ratings	8.50 Ratings
Report Versioning	00 Ratings	8.50 Ratings
Report Delivery Scheduling	00 Ratings	8.40 Ratings

Data Discovery and Visualization

Comparison of Data Discovery and Visualization features of Product A and Product B
	CashFlowCockpit - Ratings	Cube 8.6 Ratings 14% above category average
Pre-built visualization formats (heatmaps, scatter plots etc.)	00 Ratings	7.80 Ratings
Location Analytics / Geographic Visualization	00 Ratings	9.10 Ratings
Predictive Analytics	00 Ratings	8.80 Ratings
Pattern Recognition and Data Mining	00 Ratings	8.80 Ratings

Access Control and Security

Comparison of Access Control and Security features of Product A and Product B
	CashFlowCockpit - Ratings	Cube 9.3 Ratings 11% above category average
Multi-User Support (named login)	00 Ratings	9.20 Ratings
Role-Based Security Model	00 Ratings	9.50 Ratings
Multiple Access Permission Levels (Create, Read, Delete)	00 Ratings	9.20 Ratings
Report-Level Access Control	00 Ratings	9.00 Ratings
Single Sign-On (SSO)	00 Ratings	9.60 Ratings

Mobile Capabilities

Comparison of Mobile Capabilities features of Product A and Product B
	CashFlowCockpit - Ratings	Cube 9.3 Ratings 22% above category average
Responsive Design for Web Access	00 Ratings	9.70 Ratings
Mobile Application	00 Ratings	8.90 Ratings
Dashboard / Report / Visualization Interactivity on Mobile	00 Ratings	9.20 Ratings

Budgeting, Planning, and Forecasting

Comparison of Budgeting, Planning, and Forecasting features of Product A and Product B
	CashFlowCockpit - Ratings	Cube 7.5 Ratings 7% below category average
Long-term financial planning	00 Ratings	6.50 Ratings
Financial budgeting	00 Ratings	8.90 Ratings
Forecasting	00 Ratings	7.30 Ratings
Scenario modeling	00 Ratings	6.60 Ratings
Management reporting	00 Ratings	8.30 Ratings

Consolidation and Close

Comparison of Consolidation and Close features of Product A and Product B
	CashFlowCockpit - Ratings	Cube 8.5 Ratings 9% above category average
Financial data consolidation	00 Ratings	8.90 Ratings
Journal entries and reports	00 Ratings	9.60 Ratings
Multi-currency management	00 Ratings	7.10 Ratings
Intercompany Eliminations	00 Ratings	8.50 Ratings
Minority Ownership	00 Ratings	7.00 Ratings
Local and consolidated reporting	00 Ratings	10.00 Ratings
Detailed Audit Trails	00 Ratings	8.20 Ratings

Financial Reporting and Compliance

Comparison of Financial Reporting and Compliance features of Product A and Product B
	CashFlowCockpit - Ratings	Cube 8.2 Ratings 4% above category average
Financial Statement Reporting	00 Ratings	8.70 Ratings
Management Reporting	00 Ratings	7.90 Ratings
Excel-based Reporting	00 Ratings	9.20 Ratings
Automated board and financial reporting	00 Ratings	6.50 Ratings
XBRL support for regulatory filing	00 Ratings	8.90 Ratings

Analytics and Reporting

Comparison of Analytics and Reporting features of Product A and Product B
	CashFlowCockpit - Ratings	Cube 8.1 Ratings 0% above category average
Personalized dashboards	00 Ratings	8.00 Ratings
Color-coded scorecards	00 Ratings	7.50 Ratings
KPIs	00 Ratings	8.10 Ratings
Cost and profitability analysis	00 Ratings	8.20 Ratings
Key Performance Indicator setting	00 Ratings	7.70 Ratings
Benchmarking with external data	00 Ratings	9.20 Ratings

Integration

Comparison of Integration features of Product A and Product B
	CashFlowCockpit - Ratings	Cube 8.9 Ratings 9% above category average
Flat file integration	00 Ratings	9.00 Ratings
Excel data integration	00 Ratings	9.50 Ratings
Direct links to 3rd-party data sources	00 Ratings	8.30 Ratings

Best Alternatives
	CashFlowCockpit	Cube
Small Businesses	MIP Fund Accounting Score 8.7 out of 10	No answers on this topic
Medium-sized Companies	Centage Score 9.4 out of 10	Centage Score 9.4 out of 10
Enterprises	OneStream Score 8.8 out of 10	OneStream Score 8.8 out of 10
All Alternatives	View all alternatives	View all alternatives

User Ratings
	CashFlowCockpit	Cube
Likelihood to Recommend	- (0 ratings)	9.1 (0 ratings)

User Testimonials
	CashFlowCockpit	Cube
Likelihood to Recommend	No answers on this topic	1) The budget process. In QBO the budgeting capability is non-existant, unless you like manually typing in every scenario and not being able to budget by class. Cube houses my budget/forecast scenarios & lets me view and analyze by my company's preferred data points; department, GL account, vendor, & sales campaign. I'm able to run monthly budget variance reports and plan for the future with ease. 2) We've begun using Cube to help analyze profitablity by sales job. We've never had such easy access to this type of info in the past, so this is a benefit I can directly attribute to Cube. 3) We're beginning now to use an integration with our payroll software to work on headcount planning and payroll analysis. KH Kevin Hoopes Director of Finance Read full review
Pros	No answers on this topic	Push/pull information across any Google Sheet or Excel workbook. Budget at a much more granular level (by month by account by the department by vendor). Custom mapping to allow for multiple cuts of the same data. Bulk range selection within a workbook. Verified User Anonymous Read full review
Cons	No answers on this topic	Limited to 8 top line dimensions. Although you can bring in as many attributes of data as you want, but I would really like Cube to increase top line dimensions to 10. The ability for cross level interaction within multiples cube would be a major plus once implemented. Guneet Oberoi Sr FP&A Analyst Read full review
Alternatives Considered	No answers on this topic	Cube was just a lot easier to use than Vena. We took some time to look at Vena as well and while their product was impressive, our organization was not yet there. We needed something we could implement quickly, and in today's day and age I think that is a very important quality to have. Start up and early stage companies do not have the luxury of implementation teams and massive IT resources so Cube was a huge help. Incentivized CR Connor Rainey Senior Accountant Read full review
Return on Investment	No answers on this topic	It has decreased the amount of time it takes to build reports by days I can rest easy knowing the knowledge is accurate and there is no human error I have been able to create more reports than I ever dreamed of with the new time and ease of use Incentivized Verified User Anonymous Read full review
ScreenShots