Celoxis vs. Runrun.it

Celoxis is a great option if you are looking for an affordable, easy to use, easy to integrate project manegement solution. It is very powerful for waterfall project management. I evaluated more than 15 platforms and could not find any with a close evaluation in terms of cost-benefit to Celoxis. Of course there are more powerfull tools, for 10 times the price. So far, for project management, there hasn't been a requirement I haven't been able to solve with some work. It really lacks features for Agile methodologies, even if it provides a Kanban view, so far it doesn't provide and additional agile artifacts. If an organization has already reached a very mature project management practice and needs to improve on program and portfolio management, Celoxis won't provide any useful feature. If the organization has the resources (skills and time mostly) to develop some workflows and customization, it might work but with a limit. Hopefully Celoxis addresses these features in the near future.

Incentivized

Independently Invited by TrustRadius

A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info

Apropriado para gestão de tempo, organização de demandas e planejamentos, tanto de forma micro quanto de alta gestão. Inapropriado para trabalhos colaborativos na área de geração de ticket. Falta um canal de comunicação mais fluído e com mais ferramentas de suporte. Provavelmente uma interface com o hangout ou chats do e-mail cadastrado facilitassem essa comunicação. Suitable for time management, organization of demands, and planning, both on a micro level and high management. Inappropriate for collaborative work in the area of ticket generation. There is a lack of a more fluid communication channel and more support tools. Probably an interface with Hangouts or email chats would facilitate this communication.

• Project planning
• Time log
• Efforts analysis vs plan

Incentivized

Independently Invited by TrustRadius

A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info

• Creating and delegating tasks
• Time tracking (time per task)
• Workflows with step-by-step approvals
• Project management with schedules
• Criação e delegação de tarefas
• Time tracking (tempo por tarefa)
• Workflows com aprovações em etapas
• Gerenciamento de projetos com cronogramas

Incentivized

Independently Invited by TrustRadius

A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info

• Support is at times slow to respond.
• Not new user-friendly.
• Not able to pull in closer or zoom the interface.

Incentivized

Independently Invited by TrustRadius

A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info

• Painel do tempo da atividade poderia ser melhorado para retirar as horas excedentes. The activity time panel could be improved to remove the excess hours.
• visualização inicial ser direto a do seu painel. initial visualization should be directly from your dashboard.
• organização das atividades entregues. Melhor visualização. organization of the submitted activities. Better visualization.

It's easy and practical, doesn't need too much time to learn how to use it.

Incentivized

Independently Invited by TrustRadius

A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info

I used an evalaution matrix built with input of several stakeholders in the company. In the end the matrix included 100 features (non of them was price related). The matrix was heavily focused on waterfall project management, agile related features were only 5 out of 100 features. Features were labeled as mandatory, required or optional. Products which lacked a mandatory feature (like providing technical support) were disqualified. Then a price vs features evaluation was made and only the products with the best combination were seleced to continue: Celoxis, ITM Platform and Mission Control. A final technical evaluation was made comparing the full evaluation but also the evaluation of only the 40 required features. Overall, Celoxis was the better evaluated (76% vs 65% of the second place), for the 40 required features, Celoxis got 91% against 78% of number 2. In the end we chose Celoxis even when it had higher licensing cost.

Incentivized

Independently Invited by TrustRadius

A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info

• Positive in most cases

Incentivized

Independently Invited by TrustRadius

A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info

• 40% reduction in rework and missed deadlines
• 25% increase in team productivity:
• Improvement in management control and planning:
• Redução de 40% no retrabalho e perda de prazos
• Aumento de 25% na produtividade da equipe:
• Melhoria no controle de gestão e planejamento:

Incentivized

Independently Invited by TrustRadius

A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info