Centreon vs. Icinga

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Centreon
Score 8.2 out of 10
N/A
Centreon, from the French company of the same name, is an IT infrastructure monitoring platform.N/A
Icinga
Score 8.0 out of 10
N/A
Icinga is an open source network monitoring platform. It includes automation, modularized integration packages, and prebuilt alerts and reporting capabilities.N/A
Pricing
CentreonIcinga
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
CentreonIcinga
Free Trial
NoNo
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Best Alternatives
CentreonIcinga
Small Businesses
Pulseway
Pulseway
Score 8.9 out of 10
Auvik
Auvik
Score 8.4 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
IBM Instana
IBM Instana
Score 8.9 out of 10
IBM Instana
IBM Instana
Score 8.9 out of 10
Enterprises
IBM Instana
IBM Instana
Score 8.9 out of 10
IBM Instana
IBM Instana
Score 8.9 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
CentreonIcinga
Likelihood to Recommend
7.0
(1 ratings)
8.0
(7 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
-
(0 ratings)
9.0
(1 ratings)
User Testimonials
CentreonIcinga
Likelihood to Recommend
Centreon
It is a good product that is robust. They have a free version that makes the value good. If it cost money then the install and plugins would need polishing. But overall it is a good product that does what it says it does. But definitely not for beginners you do need some knowledge to set it up and get it running
Read full review
Icinga GmbH
Icinga is a world-class monitoring system. It can be used for most general monitoring situations. It is not a silver bullet, however, and there are instances where domain-specific monitoring systems are necessary. However, the output from those monitoring systems can be funneled into Icinga as a central monitoring and alerting system.
Read full review
Pros
Centreon
  • Monitor
  • Install
  • Stability
Read full review
Icinga GmbH
  • Wealth of community-developed plugins.
  • Stable codebase.
  • Icinga 2 supports distributed monitoring.
  • Very performant, can support tens of thousands of checks per server.
Read full review
Cons
Centreon
  • The install
  • More plugins
  • The alerting
Read full review
Icinga GmbH
  • High learning curve, setting up Icinga from scratch can be a bit of a challenge starting out.
  • If the io2db process fails you UI stops updating, which can be very frustrating.
  • There is no simple mechanism for adding new hosts and services through the web UI, it's all very config-file based.
Read full review
Likelihood to Renew
Centreon
No answers on this topic
Icinga GmbH
Icinga is a solid solution which does everything it promises. It is backwards compatible with most Nagios instances, making the transition very easy. Once you get the hang of installing new plugins and editing configuration files expanding its monitoring capabilities are easy.
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
Centreon
Centreon does a good job against these products. Of courseCentreon can be free and that is what we used. So it is not quite the same the other products are more polished and support is readily available. But Centreon is still good and if you have some knowledge can work just as well
Read full review
Icinga GmbH
Icinga is better than Nagios because of its nicer user interface. New Relic can monitor CPU/memory and disk usage, but it's more of a performance and application troubleshooting tool rather than monitoring
Read full review
Return on Investment
Centreon
  • It does monitoring very well
  • Details on issues is good
  • Customization is great.
Read full review
Icinga GmbH
  • With one check you know which applications are faulty e.g. after an upgrade. Which is big time saver
  • You easily detect outages ion the applications so that your customer ideally does not even realize there was an outage.
  • Detect if the environment does deliver the same result as in the same time as before to detect shortages.
  • Additional information when debugging. Saved us several hours where we could simply point to a database which was slow.
Read full review
ScreenShots