Cerner offers their population health management software platform, HealtheIntent, their cloud-based data reconciliation and population stratification platform to provide a comprehensive population health management solution.
N/A
LeonardoMD (Discontinued)
Score8 out of 10
N/A
LeonardoMD was a web -based practice management and EHR software suite acquired by Azalea Health in 2017. It is no longer available or supported.
N/A
Pricing
Cerner HealtheIntent
LeonardoMD (Discontinued)
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Cerner HealtheIntent
LeonardoMD (Discontinued)
Free Trial
No
No
Free/Freemium Version
No
No
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
No
No
Entry-level Setup Fee
No setup fee
No setup fee
Additional Details
—
—
More Pricing Information
Features
Cerner HealtheIntent
LeonardoMD (Discontinued)
Billing and Claims Management
Comparison of Billing and Claims Management features of Cerner HealtheIntent and LeonardoMD (Discontinued)
Feature
Cerner HealtheIntent
-
Ratings
LeonardoMD (Discontinued)
9.0
1 Ratings
18% above category average
Real-time eligibility verification
00 Ratings
9.01 Ratings
Claims management
00 Ratings
9.01 Ratings
Coding
00 Ratings
9.01 Ratings
Patient billing
00 Ratings
9.01 Ratings
Financial Reporting
00 Ratings
9.01 Ratings
Patient Scheduling
Comparison of Patient Scheduling features of Cerner HealtheIntent and LeonardoMD (Discontinued)
Feature
Cerner HealtheIntent
-
Ratings
LeonardoMD (Discontinued)
9.0
1 Ratings
16% above category average
Rule-based scheduling
00 Ratings
9.01 Ratings
Multi-location support
00 Ratings
9.01 Ratings
Calendar interface
00 Ratings
9.01 Ratings
Electronic Medical Records
Comparison of Electronic Medical Records features of Cerner HealtheIntent and LeonardoMD (Discontinued)
Feature
Cerner HealtheIntent
-
Ratings
LeonardoMD (Discontinued)
7.7
1 Ratings
7% above category average
Charting / document management
00 Ratings
9.01 Ratings
Templates
00 Ratings
9.01 Ratings
Fax integration
00 Ratings
9.01 Ratings
Integration with other EMR and PM systems
00 Ratings
9.01 Ratings
Workflow automation
00 Ratings
6.01 Ratings
Customization
00 Ratings
5.01 Ratings
E-prescribing
00 Ratings
7.01 Ratings
Medical Security and Privacy
Comparison of Medical Security and Privacy features of Cerner HealtheIntent and LeonardoMD (Discontinued)
Feature
Cerner HealtheIntent
-
Ratings
LeonardoMD (Discontinued)
8.0
1 Ratings
3% below category average
HIPAA compliance
00 Ratings
9.01 Ratings
Role-based permission levels
00 Ratings
9.01 Ratings
Data backups and redundancy
00 Ratings
7.01 Ratings
Local mode / networking failsafe
00 Ratings
7.01 Ratings
Workflow and Scale
Comparison of Workflow and Scale features of Cerner HealtheIntent and LeonardoMD (Discontinued)
My honest opinion is if an organization is fully running a Cerner EMR, it is almost not avoidable choice to use HealtheIntent. From performance and consistency views, it performs very well simply because HealtheIntent and Cerner EMR are from the same place. From the cost perspective, it's up to the contract. But in a general sense, it is more cost effective rather than running a separate analytics framework. If an organization is running a mix of Cerner and other clinical IT system, the answer is all but case by case.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
I would not tell my Real Estate client about this but as we know it is called LeonardoMD for a reason. I did a demo on a product a year back that offers way more automated emailing reminders for patients and I think that LeonardoMD would improve if it could offer emails and texts that could auto send reminders to patients for the appointments.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
Metadata management in HealtheIntent should be improved. For example, we could find similar looking data sources (for example, diagnosis tables with similar names) but it was hard to distinguish and know which one is the one in production. It was because several data stewards loaded the same table with a different purpose (with similar tables names). And HealtheIntent doesn't have a metadata "for a test" or "for development", which makes hard to manage versions of one data source.
To run a SQL in HealtheIntent, there is a time limit of only 10 minutes. Also, there is no delicate configuration of query execution. It may not need a lot of functions like Toad or SQL developer, but what HealtheIntent provides is very limited.
Similar to the one above, HealtheIntent may need better metadata management for users. It is hard to find a table that I need, even to find out the existence of the table. Basic statistics like the size of a table, # of rows may be helpful for users.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
We have had Cerner HealtheIntent for over 10 years and it has been a strong EMR. Other EMRs have been OK. They have just done the job, but haven't lived up to their promise. When a patch is put out for Cerner HealtheIntent, it actually works without bugs. Reaching support for Cerner HealtheIntent is easier and our issues are taken care of in a timely manner.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
I normally would use Leonardo with ACT now Sage I think. The reason for the 2 used together is the lack of email automated systems that Leo did not have. I am not sure if they have it now. But it is nice to have detailed notes and user fields that can be edited like Sage (ACT) allows. It was also nice to have the counselor able send emails and the ACT software keep track of the email in the history section
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
ROI may be depending on the contract. But even if an organization is spending the same money for either homegrown analytics or HealtheIntent, HealtheIntent provides more agility of project or cost spending. If you don't like it you can discontinue anytime.
The negative one is, HealtheIntent is a new product in Cerner and at this point, it may not be capable of everything like homegrown analytics. The question would be the future of HealtheIntent and will be able to cover what you need soon.
If an organization is pursuing a standard, generic analytics and reporting (such as the combination of Oracle and Tableau), HealtheIntent is great. If not (for example, running R and d3.js for specific cases), the cost of migration to HealtheIntent will skyrocket.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info