TrustRadius: an HG Insights company

Cerner HealtheIntent vs. LeonardoMD (Discontinued)

Save this comparison

Save this comparison

Add Product

Recommended Comparisons

    Overview
    ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price

    Cerner HealtheIntent

    Score3.5 out of 10
    N/ACerner offers their population health management software platform, HealtheIntent, their cloud-based data reconciliation and population stratification platform to provide a comprehensive population health management solution.N/A

    LeonardoMD (Discontinued)

    Score8 out of 10
    N/ALeonardoMD was a web -based practice management and EHR software suite acquired by Azalea Health in 2017. It is no longer available or supported.N/A
    Pricing
    Cerner HealtheIntentLeonardoMD (Discontinued)
    Editions & Modules
    No answers on this topic
    No answers on this topic
    Offerings
    Pricing Offerings
    Cerner HealtheIntentLeonardoMD (Discontinued)
    Free Trial
    NoNo
    Free/Freemium Version
    NoNo
    Premium Consulting/Integration Services
    NoNo
    Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
    Additional Details——
    More Pricing Information
    Features
    Cerner HealtheIntentLeonardoMD (Discontinued)
    Billing and Claims Management
    Comparison of Billing and Claims Management features of Cerner HealtheIntent and LeonardoMD (Discontinued)
    Feature
    Cerner HealtheIntent
    -
    Ratings
    LeonardoMD (Discontinued)
    9.0
    1 Ratings
    18% above category average
    Real-time eligibility verification00 Ratings9.01 Ratings
    Claims management00 Ratings9.01 Ratings
    Coding00 Ratings9.01 Ratings
    Patient billing00 Ratings9.01 Ratings
    Financial Reporting00 Ratings9.01 Ratings
    Patient Scheduling
    Comparison of Patient Scheduling features of Cerner HealtheIntent and LeonardoMD (Discontinued)
    Feature
    Cerner HealtheIntent
    -
    Ratings
    LeonardoMD (Discontinued)
    9.0
    1 Ratings
    16% above category average
    Rule-based scheduling00 Ratings9.01 Ratings
    Multi-location support00 Ratings9.01 Ratings
    Calendar interface00 Ratings9.01 Ratings
    Electronic Medical Records
    Comparison of Electronic Medical Records features of Cerner HealtheIntent and LeonardoMD (Discontinued)
    Feature
    Cerner HealtheIntent
    -
    Ratings
    LeonardoMD (Discontinued)
    7.7
    1 Ratings
    7% above category average
    Charting / document management00 Ratings9.01 Ratings
    Templates00 Ratings9.01 Ratings
    Fax integration00 Ratings9.01 Ratings
    Integration with other EMR and PM systems00 Ratings9.01 Ratings
    Workflow automation00 Ratings6.01 Ratings
    Customization00 Ratings5.01 Ratings
    E-prescribing00 Ratings7.01 Ratings
    Medical Security and Privacy
    Comparison of Medical Security and Privacy features of Cerner HealtheIntent and LeonardoMD (Discontinued)
    Feature
    Cerner HealtheIntent
    -
    Ratings
    LeonardoMD (Discontinued)
    8.0
    1 Ratings
    3% below category average
    HIPAA compliance00 Ratings9.01 Ratings
    Role-based permission levels00 Ratings9.01 Ratings
    Data backups and redundancy00 Ratings7.01 Ratings
    Local mode / networking failsafe00 Ratings7.01 Ratings
    Workflow and Scale
    Comparison of Workflow and Scale features of Cerner HealtheIntent and LeonardoMD (Discontinued)
    Feature
    Cerner HealtheIntent
    -
    Ratings
    LeonardoMD (Discontinued)
    8.0
    1 Ratings
    6% above category average
    Task tracking00 Ratings8.01 Ratings
    Specialty-specific workflows00 Ratings8.01 Ratings
    Multi-office / multi-physician capabilities00 Ratings8.01 Ratings
    Best Alternatives
    Cerner HealtheIntentLeonardoMD (Discontinued)
    Small Businesses
    No answers on this topic
    athenaClinicals
    Score10 out of 10
    Medium-sized Companies
    No answers on this topic
    CareLogic EHR
    Score10 out of 10
    Enterprises
    No answers on this topic
    Epic
    Score8.6 out of 10
    All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
    User Ratings
    Cerner HealtheIntentLeonardoMD (Discontinued)
    Likelihood to Recommend
    6.0
    (2 ratings)
    9.0
    (1 ratings)
    Usability
    -
    (0 ratings)
    9.0
    (1 ratings)
    User Testimonials
    Cerner HealtheIntentLeonardoMD (Discontinued)
    Likelihood to Recommend
    Oracle
    My honest opinion is if an organization is fully running a Cerner EMR, it is almost not avoidable choice to use HealtheIntent. From performance and consistency views, it performs very well simply because HealtheIntent and Cerner EMR are from the same place. From the cost perspective, it's up to the contract. But in a general sense, it is more cost effective rather than running a separate analytics framework. If an organization is running a mix of Cerner and other clinical IT system, the answer is all but case by case.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Discontinued Products
    I would not tell my Real Estate client about this but as we know it is called LeonardoMD for a reason. I did a demo on a product a year back that offers way more automated emailing reminders for patients and I think that LeonardoMD would improve if it could offer emails and texts that could auto send reminders to patients for the appointments.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Pros
    Oracle
    • Reliability means Cerner HealtheIntent hardly ever goes down
    • Cerner HealtheIntent can be customized for our business needs
    • We have our own Cerner HealtheIntent server instead of using the cloud
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Discontinued Products
    • Booking Appointments
    • Tracking the Patients interactions with the Practice
    • Billing
    • Reports on the Staff Utilizing the software
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Cons
    Oracle
    • Metadata management in HealtheIntent should be improved. For example, we could find similar looking data sources (for example, diagnosis tables with similar names) but it was hard to distinguish and know which one is the one in production. It was because several data stewards loaded the same table with a different purpose (with similar tables names). And HealtheIntent doesn't have a metadata "for a test" or "for development", which makes hard to manage versions of one data source.
    • To run a SQL in HealtheIntent, there is a time limit of only 10 minutes. Also, there is no delicate configuration of query execution. It may not need a lot of functions like Toad or SQL developer, but what HealtheIntent provides is very limited.
    • Similar to the one above, HealtheIntent may need better metadata management for users. It is hard to find a table that I need, even to find out the existence of the table. Basic statistics like the size of a table, # of rows may be helpful for users.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Discontinued Products
    • Internal Email System
    • Variety of Reports
    • Availability for editing the user fields for a more personalized experience.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Usability
    Oracle
    No answers on this topic
    Discontinued Products
    It does exactly what the medical practice I was working with needed.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Alternatives Considered
    Oracle
    We have had Cerner HealtheIntent for over 10 years and it has been a strong EMR. Other EMRs have been OK. They have just done the job, but haven't lived up to their promise. When a patch is put out for Cerner HealtheIntent, it actually works without bugs. Reaching support for Cerner HealtheIntent is easier and our issues are taken care of in a timely manner.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Discontinued Products
    I normally would use Leonardo with ACT now Sage I think. The reason for the 2 used together is the lack of email automated systems that Leo did not have. I am not sure if they have it now. But it is nice to have detailed notes and user fields that can be edited like Sage (ACT) allows. It was also nice to have the counselor able send emails and the ACT software keep track of the email in the history section
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Return on Investment
    Oracle
    • ROI may be depending on the contract. But even if an organization is spending the same money for either homegrown analytics or HealtheIntent, HealtheIntent provides more agility of project or cost spending. If you don't like it you can discontinue anytime.
    • The negative one is, HealtheIntent is a new product in Cerner and at this point, it may not be capable of everything like homegrown analytics. The question would be the future of HealtheIntent and will be able to cover what you need soon.
    • If an organization is pursuing a standard, generic analytics and reporting (such as the combination of Oracle and Tableau), HealtheIntent is great. If not (for example, running R and d3.js for specific cases), the cost of migration to HealtheIntent will skyrocket.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Discontinued Products
    No answers on this topic
    ScreenShots