Cerner Practice Management vs. MTBC PracticePro

Cerner Practice Management

Cerner Practice Management

5 Reviews and Ratings

MTBC PracticePro

MTBC PracticePro

0 Reviews and Ratings

Overview
Product	Rating	Most Used By	Product Summary	Starting Price
Cerner Practice Management	Score 5.4 out of 10	N/A	Cerner Practice Management, formerly under the name "PowerWorks"is a software solution that enables users to manage clinic operations across registration, scheduling, patient tracking, patient accounting and reporting through one workflow.	N/A
MTBC PracticePro	Score 0.0 out of 10	N/A	MTBC, headquartered in Somerset, offers the PracticePro medical practice management suite and CRM, supporting revenue cycle management and medical billing, and also including EHR, balance and appointment reminders, and real-time claims adjustment.	N/A

Pricing

Cerner Practice Management

MTBC PracticePro

Editions & Modules

No answers on this topic

No answers on this topic

Offerings

Pricing Offerings
Cerner Practice Management	MTBC PracticePro
Free Trial
No	No
Free/Freemium Version
No	No
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
No	No

Entry-level Setup Fee

No setup fee

No setup fee

Additional Details

—

—

More Pricing Information

Community Pulse
	Cerner Practice Management	MTBC PracticePro
Top Pros	Pro Ease of use Pro Create multiple Pro Added bonus	No answers on this topic
Top Cons	Minus Two screens Minus Copy and paste Minus Paste function	No answers on this topic

Best Alternatives
	Cerner Practice Management	MTBC PracticePro
Small Businesses	Kareo Practice Management Score 6.9 out of 10	Kareo Practice Management Score 6.9 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies	Qualifacts CareLogic EHR Score 9.9 out of 10	Qualifacts CareLogic EHR Score 9.9 out of 10
Enterprises	Epic Score 8.4 out of 10	Epic Score 8.4 out of 10
All Alternatives	View all alternatives	View all alternatives

User Ratings
	Cerner Practice Management	MTBC PracticePro
Likelihood to Recommend	5.0 (3 ratings)	- (0 ratings)
Performance	7.0 (1 ratings)	- (0 ratings)

User Testimonials
	Cerner Practice Management	MTBC PracticePro
Likelihood to Recommend	Oracle Well suited in the clinical setting although a little tedious. Not suited in many other places. Incentivized Jordynn Akins, RN, BSN Registered Nurse Read full review	MTBC No answers on this topic
Pros	Oracle Scheduling - I personally enjoy the ease of use with the solution. It also has a great "memory" as to patient rescheduling, no shows, etc. Being able to create multiple schedules to reflect different practitioners is such a major plus in this system. Customization - I am able to create Super-bills, Global Periods, and Insurance Details pertinent to each patient and not have to RECREATE them every time like I had to in past systems. EOB - an added bonus is the ability for the system to check EOB ahead of time. This is a HUGE time saving in an office! Incentivized Katarina L. Rawdan Information Technology and Services Professional Read full review	MTBC No answers on this topic
Cons	Oracle Only seems applicable for small organizations. Incentivized Maria Porter Cardiovascular Monitor Technician Read full review	MTBC No answers on this topic
Performance	Oracle Everything within the system works smoothly, it’s just time-consuming and could be a bit more simplistic. Incentivized Jordynn Akins, RN, BSN Registered Nurse Read full review	MTBC No answers on this topic
Alternatives Considered	Oracle I personally would use this system over any other systems currently on the market. Athena has a nice product...however, it can be quite expensive and the colors are draining on the eyes. eClinical Works also has a system that is comparable, but the customization I found wasn't as easy as the Cerner product Incentivized Katarina L. Rawdan Information Technology and Services Professional Read full review	MTBC No answers on this topic
ScreenShots