Cerner Practice Management vs. TriZetto Core Administration (Facets, QNXT and QicLink)

Cerner Practice Management

Cerner Practice Management

4 Reviews and Ratings

TriZetto Core Administration (Facets, QNXT and QicLink)

TriZetto Core Administration (Facets, QNXT and QicLink)

4 Reviews and Ratings

Overview
Product	Rating	Most Used By	Product Summary	Starting Price
Cerner Practice Management	Score 6.0 out of 10	N/A	Cerner Practice Management, formerly under the name "PowerWorks"is a software solution that enables users to manage clinic operations across registration, scheduling, patient tracking, patient accounting and reporting through one workflow.	N/A
TriZetto Core Administration (Facets, QNXT and QicLink)	Score 7.0 out of 10	N/A	The TriZetto Core Administration platform aims to provide the flexibility, automation and configurability needed to boost payer efficiency and launch new business models. Cognizant’s line of TriZetto Healthcare Products provides enterprise-wide core administration solutions. Editions include Facets®, QNXT™ and QicLink™. These aim to enable organizations to conduct core administrative tasks with the ability to anticipate tomorrow’s healthcare industry with additional functionality and product…	N/A

Pricing

Cerner Practice Management

TriZetto Core Administration (Facets, QNXT and QicLink)

Editions & Modules

No answers on this topic

No answers on this topic

Offerings

Pricing Offerings
Cerner Practice Management	TriZetto Core Administration (Facets, QNXT and QicLink)
Free Trial
No	No
Free/Freemium Version
No	No
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
No	No

Entry-level Setup Fee

No setup fee

No setup fee

Additional Details

—

—

More Pricing Information

Community Pulse
	Cerner Practice Management	TriZetto Core Administration (Facets, QNXT and QicLink)
Top Pros	Pro Ease of use Pro Create multiple Pro Added bonus	Pro Easily monitor Pro Quick review Pro Data entry
Top Cons	Minus Two screens Minus Copy and paste Minus Paste function	Minus Service is exceptional Minus Web portal Minus Easy to use

Best Alternatives
	Cerner Practice Management	TriZetto Core Administration (Facets, QNXT and QicLink)
Small Businesses	Kareo Practice Management Score 7.1 out of 10	Kareo Practice Management Score 7.1 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies	Qualifacts CareLogic EHR Score 9.8 out of 10	Qualifacts CareLogic EHR Score 9.8 out of 10
Enterprises	Epic Score 8.0 out of 10	Epic Score 8.0 out of 10
All Alternatives	View all alternatives	View all alternatives

User Ratings
	Cerner Practice Management	TriZetto Core Administration (Facets, QNXT and QicLink)
Likelihood to Recommend	5.0 (3 ratings)	9.0 (1 ratings)
Performance	7.0 (1 ratings)	- (0 ratings)

User Testimonials
	Cerner Practice Management	TriZetto Core Administration (Facets, QNXT and QicLink)
Likelihood to Recommend	Oracle Well suited in the clinical setting although a little tedious. Not suited in many other places. Incentivized Jordynn Akins, RN, BSN Registered Nurse Read full review	Cognizant It's all about the knowledge base and talents of the end user. Trizetto performs well with most users, it performs extremely well in the hands of top talent. Incentivized GF Gregory D. Fox DC, DCBCN Creative Partner \| Principal Read full review
Pros	Oracle Scheduling - I personally enjoy the ease of use with the solution. It also has a great "memory" as to patient rescheduling, no shows, etc. Being able to create multiple schedules to reflect different practitioners is such a major plus in this system. Customization - I am able to create Super-bills, Global Periods, and Insurance Details pertinent to each patient and not have to RECREATE them every time like I had to in past systems. EOB - an added bonus is the ability for the system to check EOB ahead of time. This is a HUGE time saving in an office! Incentivized Katarina L. Rawdan Information Technology and Services Professional Read full review	Cognizant Reduced claims errors and quick reprocessing Easily monitor a 6-7 figure AR View productivity across multiple departments Incentivized GF Gregory D. Fox DC, DCBCN Creative Partner \| Principal Read full review
Cons	Oracle Only seems applicable for small organizations. Incentivized Maria Porter Cardiovascular Monitor Technician Read full review	Cognizant Customer service is exceptional, no issues here Web portal is easy to use, again very satisfied I would like to see more opportunites for training videos/ best use training Incentivized GF Gregory D. Fox DC, DCBCN Creative Partner \| Principal Read full review
Performance	Oracle Everything within the system works smoothly, it’s just time-consuming and could be a bit more simplistic. Incentivized Jordynn Akins, RN, BSN Registered Nurse Read full review	Cognizant No answers on this topic
Alternatives Considered	Oracle I personally would use this system over any other systems currently on the market. Athena has a nice product...however, it can be quite expensive and the colors are draining on the eyes. eClinical Works also has a system that is comparable, but the customization I found wasn't as easy as the Cerner product Incentivized Katarina L. Rawdan Information Technology and Services Professional Read full review	Cognizant There are a number of other offers, but you will find the robust nature of facets and ease of use - an easy decision to make. Incentivized GF Gregory D. Fox DC, DCBCN Creative Partner \| Principal Read full review
Return on Investment	Oracle No answers on this topic	Cognizant Combined with Clear Healthcare Estimates HCT, we have a collections of patient responsibility that exceed 96%. Industry average is less than 55%. Our ROI increased modestly with this service, although our team performs quite well with previous product Incentivized GF Gregory D. Fox DC, DCBCN Creative Partner \| Principal Read full review
ScreenShots