Certinia FM Cloud automates financial management on the Salesforce platform. The customer-centric software includes a general ledger, automated billing processes, and financial intelligence.
N/A
Visual Lease
Score 7.0 out of 10
N/A
Visual Lease is a Lease Management Software that provides lease accounting functionality with lease administration functionality to manage a company's lease portfolio.
N/A
Pricing
Certinia FM Cloud
Visual Lease
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Certinia FM Cloud
Visual Lease
Free Trial
No
No
Free/Freemium Version
No
No
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
Yes
No
Entry-level Setup Fee
Required
No setup fee
Additional Details
Certinia Professional Services Cloud software follows a subscription-based pricing model that is typically structured according to the number of users and the level of features required. The software’s pricing may vary depending on the organization’s size and needs, with options to select modules or add-ons for additional functionality. Specific pricing details may require a consultation or quote from Certinia for tailored solutions.
—
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Certinia FM Cloud
Visual Lease
Features
Certinia FM Cloud
Visual Lease
Payroll Management
Comparison of Payroll Management features of Product A and Product B
Certinia FM Cloud
8.4
2 Ratings
13% above category average
Visual Lease
-
Ratings
Pay calculation
8.52 Ratings
00 Ratings
Benefit plan administration
8.02 Ratings
00 Ratings
Direct deposit files
9.02 Ratings
00 Ratings
Customization
Comparison of Customization features of Product A and Product B
Certinia FM Cloud
8.4
4 Ratings
12% above category average
Visual Lease
-
Ratings
API for custom integration
8.84 Ratings
00 Ratings
Plug-ins
8.03 Ratings
00 Ratings
Security
Comparison of Security features of Product A and Product B
Certinia FM Cloud
8.4
5 Ratings
0% above category average
Visual Lease
-
Ratings
Single sign-on capability
8.65 Ratings
00 Ratings
Role-based user permissions
8.15 Ratings
00 Ratings
Reporting & Analytics
Comparison of Reporting & Analytics features of Product A and Product B
Certinia FM Cloud
7.9
5 Ratings
7% above category average
Visual Lease
-
Ratings
Dashboards
8.45 Ratings
00 Ratings
Standard reports
6.55 Ratings
00 Ratings
Custom reports
8.85 Ratings
00 Ratings
General Ledger and Configurable Accounting
Comparison of General Ledger and Configurable Accounting features of Product A and Product B
Certinia FM Cloud
7.9
6 Ratings
3% above category average
Visual Lease
-
Ratings
Accounts payable
8.05 Ratings
00 Ratings
Accounts receivable
7.14 Ratings
00 Ratings
Global Financial Support
8.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
Primary and Secondary Ledgers
7.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
Journals and Reconciliations
6.33 Ratings
00 Ratings
Configurable Accounting
7.43 Ratings
00 Ratings
Standardized Processes
8.73 Ratings
00 Ratings
Inventory Management
Comparison of Inventory Management features of Product A and Product B
Certinia FM Cloud
10.0
3 Ratings
23% above category average
Visual Lease
-
Ratings
Inventory tracking
10.03 Ratings
00 Ratings
Automatic reordering
10.03 Ratings
00 Ratings
Location management
10.03 Ratings
00 Ratings
Order Management
Comparison of Order Management features of Product A and Product B
Certinia FM Cloud
8.1
2 Ratings
3% above category average
Visual Lease
-
Ratings
Pricing
8.02 Ratings
00 Ratings
Order entry
8.02 Ratings
00 Ratings
Credit card processing
8.52 Ratings
00 Ratings
Cost of goods sold
8.02 Ratings
00 Ratings
Subledger and Financial Process
Comparison of Subledger and Financial Process features of Product A and Product B
Certinia FM Cloud
8.7
1 Ratings
15% above category average
Visual Lease
-
Ratings
Travel & Expense Management
10.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
Budgetary Control & Encumbrance Accounting
7.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
Project Financial Management
Comparison of Project Financial Management features of Product A and Product B
Certinia FM Cloud
9.3
1 Ratings
20% above category average
Visual Lease
-
Ratings
Budgeting and Forecasting
9.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
Project Costing
9.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
Cost Capture
10.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
Capital Project Management
9.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
Customer Contract Compliance
10.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
Project Revenue Recognition
10.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
Project Execution Management
Comparison of Project Execution Management features of Product A and Product B
For accounting systems, users and/or evaluators often want to see some type of matrix or "heads up" comparisons of specific features and functionality of a system in key areas such as: 1) General Ledger 2) Order to Cash cycle 3) Purchase to Pay cycle 4) Cash management 5) Inventory and/or Cost Accounting (Projects/Jobs, etc) 6) Revenue Recognition 7) Fixed Assets management 8) Budgets 9) Tax 10) Reports and Analysis It would be great if this kind of matrix existed to be filled in by reviewers so that others could benefit from their perspectives about the applications and how they address or handle the specific features/functionality. With respect to FinancialForce, the company has found that nearly all the key features it needed were available from the application.
Visual Lease is well suited for companies that are trying to manage their leases in a more automated way other then spreadsheet. A company that needs visibility around their leases and wants to stay in compliance with the ever changing world of accounting. A company that wants a software that can integrate with their ERP and make routine monthly accounting entries.
Since SalesForce was not made with accounting in mind, building FinancialForce as a module on top of SalesForce gives problems because the overarching architect of SalesForce cannot facilitate all the accounting requirements.
The FinancialForce integration team was not very good, and did not help us set up our FinancialForce very well. Their customer support is also lacking and takes a long time to respond and troubleshoot our problems.
FinancialForce doesn't actually build financial statement reports. We were only able to run a trial balance, and we had to build the statements ourselves in Excel.
The company has now converted its legacy, "home grown" operations system and built it on the force.com platform, and the integration between it and FinancialForce is deeply entrenched. No other application would be able to replicate this functionality, and the company will be able to scale and leverage the force.com platform as it grows.
Change management is always an issue, but the evidence of the application's usability is that both long-time employees (used to the legacy systems for many years) and newer employees have been able to learn the system and improve their business processes.
Unless the internet is completely unavailable - which has not happened yet - the application is always accessible. Since FinancialForce is built on the force.com platform, it's uptime is tied to Salesforce security and system performance standards
The response time for FinancialForce is exemplary. Immediate acknowledgement of the support request by automatically logging a case/ticket on the provider side, then less than 24-hour follow up by a support team member with specific questions, information or resolution for the issue.
Visual Lease support was not too impressive to me because when I reached out to ask about the XXX codes in the journal entries, they did not seem concerned. They just said they were default accounts, but I did not know what I was supposed to do with them since we did not have these accounts. Also, when I asked about API integration, I could not get a good response on how to get Visual Lease to be connected with Intacct.
Through its Xtra login website available to its customers, FinancialForce offers a complete set of online, video tutorials, training and documentation. Each tutorial is "bite-sized", meaning it imparts instructional, step-by-step information in 2-3 minute narrated videos. For a particular cycle or process, like invoices to payments for example, each tutorial builds on the last so that the user can get a complete picture of the steps and process in less than 10 minutes.
The company decided to run parallel for three months in order to soften the impact of the change from the legacy "system" - which users had been interfacing with for over a decade - to FinancialForce. While not recommended, this did provide time for the in-house "super user" team of 2 people to become completely familiar with the application, and thus provide hands-on training and be a resource for the users who would be processing the daily accounting transactions.
FinancialForce Subscription & Usage Billing has more features, more useability, and manages higher numbers of customers. The systems I have used in the past are easier to navigate but couldn't handle this number of customers.
We also evaluated Lease Accelerator and Lease Query. We didn't go with Lease Accelerator because it didn't have lessor leases. We did not go with Lease Query because they did not have abstract reports.