CGM Medisoft vs. TriZetto Core Administration (Facets, QNXT and QicLink)

For smaller practices that do not bill insurance, Medisoft may be a bit more than they really need. However, if they desire the ability to track patient appointments and financials all in one place, as well as run detailed reports on practice data, this still may be a good option.

It's all about the knowledge base and talents of the end user. Trizetto performs well with most users, it performs extremely well in the hands of top talent.

Incentivized

• Medisoft is relatively easy to use.
• There are a lot of customizable features.
• Training users on the product is not a long process because it is intuitive.

Incentivized

• Reduced claims errors and quick reprocessing
• Easily monitor a 6-7 figure AR
• View productivity across multiple departments

Incentivized

• Medisoft is hard to teach to new employees.

Incentivized

• Customer service is exceptional, no issues here
• Web portal is easy to use, again very satisfied
• I would like to see more opportunites for training videos/ best use training

Incentivized

I prefer Medisoft due to ease of use, functionality and custom report features. In my experience with other software programs I found them to be either less user friendly or lacking in key features that we require for our particular practice.

There are a number of other offers, but you will find the robust nature of facets and ease of use - an easy decision to make.

Incentivized

• Medisoft is a good product, but I feel the cost of assurance is too high.
• With all the different components each being billed separately adds up quickly.
• Keeping patient charts/bills up to date is pretty easy.

Incentivized

• Combined with Clear Healthcare Estimates HCT, we have a collections of patient responsibility that exceed 96%. Industry average is less than 55%.
• Our ROI increased modestly with this service, although our team performs quite well with previous product

Incentivized