Checkmarx vs. Google Threat Intelligence (Mandiant)
| Product | Rating | Most Used By | Product Summary | Starting Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Checkmarx | Score7.6 out of 10 | N/A | Checkmarx, an Israeli headquartered company with US offices, provides a suite of application security software delivered via the Checkmarx Software Security Platform. Individual modules and capabilities include Checkmarx Static Application Security Testing, Checkmarx Software Composition Analysis, Checkmarx Interactive Application Security Testing (CxIAST) | N/A |
Google Threat Intelligence (Mandiant) | Score10 out of 10 | Enterprise companies (1,001+ employees) | Google Threat Intelligence, based on the expertise and service of Mandiant, aims to accelerate security and risk decision making – operational as well as strategic – and to enable security teams to focus on threats that matter to them. | N/A |
| Checkmarx | Google Threat Intelligence (Mandiant) | |||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Editions & Modules | No answers on this topic | No answers on this topic | ||||||||||||||
| Offerings |
| |||||||||||||||
| Entry-level Setup Fee | No setup fee | Optional | ||||||||||||||
| Additional Details | — | Priced by company size | ||||||||||||||
| More Pricing Information | ||||||||||||||||
| Checkmarx | Google Threat Intelligence (Mandiant) | |
|---|---|---|
| Considered Both Products | No answer on this topic | No answer on this topic |
| Key User Insights | ||
| Would buy again | ||
No answers on this topic | 100% Would buy again 17 Answers | |
| Delivers good value for the price | ||
No answers on this topic | 100% Delivers good value for the price 14 Answers | |
| Happy with the feature set | ||
No answers on this topic | 100% Happy with the feature set 17 Answers | |
| Lived up to sales and marketing promises | ||
No answers on this topic | 80% Lived up to sales and marketing promises 8 Answers | |
| Implementation went as expected | ||
No answers on this topic | 100% Implementation went as expected 14 Answers | |
| Checkmarx | Google Threat Intelligence (Mandiant) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Endpoint Security |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Threat Intelligence |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Checkmarx | Google Threat Intelligence (Mandiant) | |
|---|---|---|
| Small Businesses | Rencore Code (SPCAF) Score8.8 out of 10 | No answers on this topic |
| Medium-sized Companies | Trend Vision One Email and Collaboration Security Score9.9 out of 10 | No answers on this topic |
| Enterprises | Trend Vision One Email and Collaboration Security Score9.9 out of 10 | No answers on this topic |
| All Alternatives | View all alternatives | View all alternatives |
| Checkmarx | Google Threat Intelligence (Mandiant) | |
|---|---|---|
| Likelihood to Recommend | 8.3 | 7.8 |
| Usability | 7.7 | 7.6 |
| Checkmarx | Google Threat Intelligence (Mandiant) | |
|---|---|---|
| Likelihood to Recommend |
|
|
| Pros |
|
|
| Cons |
|
|
| Usability |
|
|
| Alternatives Considered |
|
|
| Return on Investment |
|
|
| ScreenShots | Google Threat Intelligence (Mandiant) Screenshots |





