Checkmarx vs. Onapsis

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Checkmarx
Score 8.8 out of 10
N/A
Checkmarx, an Israeli headquartered company with US offices, provides a suite of application security software delivered via the Checkmarx Software Security Platform. Individual modules and capabilities include Checkmarx Static Application Security Testing, Checkmarx Software Composition Analysis, Checkmarx Interactive Application Security Testing (CxIAST)N/A
Onapsis
Score 9.7 out of 10
N/A
Onapsis, headquartered in Boston, offers application security software to enterprises in the form of the Onapsis Security Platform for SAP and the Onapsis Security Platform for Oracle E-Business Suite.N/A
Pricing
CheckmarxOnapsis
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
CheckmarxOnapsis
Free Trial
NoNo
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
CheckmarxOnapsis
Best Alternatives
CheckmarxOnapsis
Small Businesses
GitLab
GitLab
Score 8.6 out of 10
GitLab
GitLab
Score 8.6 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
Veracode
Veracode
Score 9.2 out of 10
Veracode
Veracode
Score 9.2 out of 10
Enterprises
Veracode
Veracode
Score 9.2 out of 10
Veracode
Veracode
Score 9.2 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
CheckmarxOnapsis
Likelihood to Recommend
8.5
(5 ratings)
9.0
(3 ratings)
Usability
7.5
(2 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
CheckmarxOnapsis
Likelihood to Recommend
Checkmarx
If you are going with SAST process or want to improve overall security posture then go for it like integrating it with post deployment steps. If you are more concerned about proactive controls better choose other options such as pee-commit hooks and CI security. Also choose other tools for DAST and API scans.
Read full review
Onapsis
Onapsis is divided into 4 major components,
  1. Assess
  2. Comply
  3. Defend
  4. Control
In assess, it does a whitebox and blackbox testing of the ERP systems that have been added to the Onapsis console. It highlights relevant application issues and automates the process, also provides the solutions to implement the fix. In comply, it provides a governance on the various regulatory compliances which the firm has to follow, as well as provides a firm grip to the audit and ERP admin team. In control, it enables a workflow of 15 pre-defined parameter values within the SAP system and helps monitor, and track the changes made to those parameters. The capabilities are to either block, or request for an approval for changes made to those parameters in addition to just monitoring them. In defend, it goes through the SAP logs; and compares it with a pre-defined ruleset to alert the end-users via email or SIEM tool or both.
Read full review
Pros
Checkmarx
  • Detects security vulnerabilities in source code with accuracy and detail.
  • Integrates seamlessly with CI/CD pipelines, IDEs, and repositories.
  • Provides clear reports and actionable fix recommendations for developers.
Read full review
Onapsis
  • Eliminating the manual process improves the overall accuracy of results and also frees up valuable resources to focus on other different projects.
  • Onapsis provides great leverage to our technical teams in order to review in a standardized way of the landscape.
  • Onapsis always matches vulnerabilities with useful context and finds possible solutions.
  • Onapsis is usually implemented to continuously monitor, and alert us on any issues on the SAP systems. Not only this but implementing Onapsis also eliminates the network on the year-end and month-end audits and helps in making the overall process faster, smooth, efficient as well as accurate.
Read full review
Cons
Checkmarx
  • Scan duration
  • False positives
  • Integration with other tools like Jenkins comes with some inconveniences.
Read full review
Onapsis
  • Multiple UIs
  • No proper customization of UI log-off
  • Tedious setup of Control component
  • No proper error messages received
Read full review
Usability
Checkmarx
Their API based customizations which I leveraged to create an ASPM package, which is developer friendly and can extend above the dashboard features, other ones are UI which is great and feels clutter free. Menu and navigation is also good so as support. Only drawback is sometimes scan takes longer which I feel so can be reduced
Read full review
Onapsis
No answers on this topic
Alternatives Considered
Checkmarx
Checkmarx is easier to integrate with development tools and gives quick feedback during coding, which is helpful for developers. Veracode is more focused on scanning and reporting for compliance, but it’s more complex to set up. We chose Checkmarx because it fits better into our development process, offering faster scans and more useful suggestions for fixing problems
Read full review
Onapsis
Honestly, I havent use something like Onapsis before and currently I am not aware if there is something similiar out there. They are one of a kind and is a complete suit, so is unlikelly that someone from outside will appear with a better solution.
Read full review
Return on Investment
Checkmarx
  • Improved ability to provide high level of IA confidence
  • Improved confidence in application-level security
Read full review
Onapsis
  • It offers very reasonable packages.
  • The customer support of Onapsis is reliable and efficient.
  • It is a great platform as it shows a unified and easy-to-read different and complex topics in a simpler way.
Read full review
ScreenShots