Likelihood to Recommend
Chechmarx is really suited for finding wide range of security risks. It although identifies false positives which can be confusing at times. It can do better in terms of scan duration. They are better alternate competitors in the market who can do equally good or even better. It all depends on the scope of the problem you want to address
Read full review
Onapsis is divided into 4 major components,
Assess Comply Defend Control
In assess, it does a whitebox and blackbox testing of the ERP systems that have been added to the Onapsis console. It highlights relevant application issues and automates the process, also provides the solutions to implement the fix. In comply, it provides a governance on the various regulatory compliances which the firm has to follow, as well as provides a firm grip to the audit and ERP admin team. In control, it enables a workflow of 15 pre-defined parameter values within the SAP system and helps monitor, and track the changes made to those parameters. The capabilities are to either block, or request for an approval for changes made to those parameters in addition to just monitoring them. In defend, it goes through the SAP logs; and compares it with a pre-defined ruleset to alert the end-users via email or SIEM tool or both.
Read full review Pros Reporting Language support Fix recommendations Read full review Eliminating the manual process improves the overall accuracy of results and also frees up valuable resources to focus on other different projects. Onapsis provides great leverage to our technical teams in order to review in a standardized way of the landscape. Onapsis always matches vulnerabilities with useful context and finds possible solutions. Onapsis is usually implemented to continuously monitor, and alert us on any issues on the SAP systems. Not only this but implementing Onapsis also eliminates the network on the year-end and month-end audits and helps in making the overall process faster, smooth, efficient as well as accurate. Read full review Cons Lots of false positives Hard to integrate with CI Read full review Multiple UIs No proper customization of UI log-off Tedious setup of Control component No proper error messages received Read full review Alternatives Considered
We actually use Checkmarx along with the other tools. However, the reason we chose Checkmarx is its wide support for languages and useful fix recommendations. The flowcharts help better understand the data flow and give a clear picture of what needs to be fixed and how. Also, developers can make a note of what should be avoided in the future. Overall, it's a great tool and would be a good investment to make.
Read full review
Honestly, I havent use something like Onapsis before and currently I am not aware if there is something similiar out there. They are one of a kind and is a complete suit, so is unlikelly that someone from outside will appear with a better solution.
Read full review Return on Investment Improved ability to provide high level of IA confidence Improved confidence in application-level security Read full review It offers very reasonable packages. The customer support of Onapsis is reliable and efficient. It is a great platform as it shows a unified and easy-to-read different and complex topics in a simpler way. Read full review ScreenShots