Cisco 800 Series Integrated Services Routers (ISR 800) vs. MikroTik Cloud Router Switch

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Cisco 800 Series Integrated Services Routers (ISR 800)
Score 8.6 out of 10
N/A
Cisco 800 Series Integrated Services Routers (ISR 800) are designed to supply data, security and wireless capabilities in a simple to use form.N/A
MikroTik CRS Series
Score 9.0 out of 10
N/A
MikroTik offers a series of Cloud Router Switches (or their CRS series), their flagship products.N/A
Pricing
Cisco 800 Series Integrated Services Routers (ISR 800)MikroTik Cloud Router Switch
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Cisco 800 Series Integrated Services Routers (ISR 800)MikroTik CRS Series
Free Trial
NoNo
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Cisco 800 Series Integrated Services Routers (ISR 800)MikroTik Cloud Router Switch
Best Alternatives
Cisco 800 Series Integrated Services Routers (ISR 800)MikroTik Cloud Router Switch
Small Businesses

No answers on this topic

No answers on this topic

Medium-sized Companies
Cisco Routers
Cisco Routers
Score 9.2 out of 10
Cisco Routers
Cisco Routers
Score 9.2 out of 10
Enterprises
Cisco Routers
Cisco Routers
Score 9.2 out of 10
Cisco Routers
Cisco Routers
Score 9.2 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
Cisco 800 Series Integrated Services Routers (ISR 800)MikroTik Cloud Router Switch
Likelihood to Recommend
8.2
(14 ratings)
9.0
(1 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
9.1
(1 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Usability
9.1
(1 ratings)
8.0
(1 ratings)
Support Rating
9.1
(1 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Implementation Rating
9.1
(1 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
Cisco 800 Series Integrated Services Routers (ISR 800)MikroTik Cloud Router Switch
Likelihood to Recommend
Cisco
More suited is where we need more flexibility in terms of diagnosing the issues and also troubleshooting, which makes it easier for us because we have a more transparent way of diagnosing faults and fixing the issues. So that's a good one. I'm not too sure what is the less appropriate areas, but I could see less appropriate, probably not in places where it's a quick deployment on the cloud side. So probably that's right, I think. And all the security solutions as well
Read full review
Mikrotik
MikroTik Cloud Router Switch work very well as layer2/3 switches in enterprise environments, aggregation or distribution layers. Example: in our case (ISP) we use CRS326 and CRS317 at multi-dwelling units to finish the customer lines, manage vlans of service and apply basic qos. They offer a good variety of ports 1/10G, which is perfect for connecting other ISPs or connecting corporate end users. MikroTik Cloud Router Switch would work fine in low-traffic Routing and Switching, you could configure L3 Hardware offloading and serve some significant traffic, but you may missing some features like, mangle, nat, firewall or other things that may be solved with other device in an upper layer of infrastructure. Based on our experience MikroTik Cloud Router Switch is not good for high performance traffic, they are not optimized for heavy L3 routing task. Example: if you use a CRS as core or router in a small DC or IX the result is traduced on high cpu usage and load performance. If you are looking for special works, MikroTik Cloud Router Switch in this aspect is out.
Read full review
Pros
Cisco
  • [Cisco 800 Series Integrated] Routers can form tunnels over a cellular network via the SIM inserted into it.
  • With an external antenna attached to it, their coverage is very good, making them suitable for remote sites where network coverage from ISPs is a concern.
  • They function as a switch and router in one device.
Read full review
Mikrotik
  • L3 Hardware Offloading
  • Vlan segmentation
  • Traffic troughput
  • Port density
  • Cost effective
  • Port Isolation
  • Trunk, access and hybrid configurations
Read full review
Cons
Cisco
  • Being one of the most versatile routing/switching platforms available, it fulfills most functions one would need in a compact appliance.
  • I have not experienced lack of functionality in any areas we use the appliance for.
  • One small feature I would like to have is 19" rack mount.
Read full review
Mikrotik
  • L3 features like firewall IPsec NAT
  • LACP with more than 4 interfaces
  • Centralized Management platflorm
  • Limited Hardware offloading insight
  • Outdated web interface
  • CLI usability
Read full review
Likelihood to Renew
Cisco
Cisco has provided a real diverse router in a small package that meets the needs of our current environment. I highly recommend this product and should feel the to consider this type of solution, you would have made the right decision
Read full review
Mikrotik
No answers on this topic
Usability
Cisco
This router is easy to use and manage. It provides the features, most important the security our organization requires to function properly. There is also cohesion between the HQ router we are currently using.
Read full review
Mikrotik
Powerful features at a low price: MikroTik Cloud Router Switch provides a good variety of features that are not present on more expensive brands. Flexible deployment options: SwOS for simple switching use cases and RouterOS for more advanced configurations. Winbox is a fast and responsive tool for configuring, maintain and monitoring the traffic or other variable. Why it doesn't score higher, we think that the learning curve for new users could be hard. Sometimes the logic configuration can be unintuitive example: bridge filtering, vlan interfaces. Inconsistent UX Across RouterOS versions, some features may change without clear documentation causing confusion missconfig or incompatibility between versions. Documentation and support are poor, official documentation is fragmented and depht in some cases, the active community should be your best friend.
Read full review
Support Rating
Cisco
I think Cisco is a good product that offers a huge list of options where you can get support from. I find that forums, blogs and communities really assist wit resolving any issues that you might come across.
Read full review
Mikrotik
No answers on this topic
Implementation Rating
Cisco
Implementation of this router is relatively easy. What i can say is plan your implementation and consider the the environment you are going to use it for.
Read full review
Mikrotik
No answers on this topic
Alternatives Considered
Cisco
We looked into setting up Site to Site VPN with either Cisco ASAs or [Fortinet] FortiGate Firewalls. We were unable to find a product that didn't also require us to set up an LTE modem separately. It would have forced us to have a mess of cables and multiple devices. Our kit for the field with the Cisco 800 [Series Integrated Services Router] is simple: router, power cables, and wireless access point. Everything is labeled and attached plugs into one device. Any field user can follow the instructions [to] get up and running quickly.
Read full review
Mikrotik
We chose MikroTik Cloud Router Switch because it met our technical requirements without significantly affecting our budget. MikroTik Cloud Router Switch offers a performance reliable and scalable for access and aggregation roles and is easy to integrate with our existing infrastructure (Mikrotik CCR). While it doesn't offer enterprise-class UX, or automation frameworks out the box, its disruptive focus, control and granular configuration convert it in an attractive option for ISP operations.
Read full review
Return on Investment
Cisco
  • The long-term stability is great, we have very few problems, resulting in low maintenance costs.
  • Configuration for almost all routers in the basics is the same, so there's a very short learning curve per model.
  • Running some models of Router for more than 10 years of stability, so the ROI with the devices is greater than expected on starting.
Read full review
Mikrotik
  • Significant Cost Savings
  • Rapid deployment and flexibility
  • Bottlenecks in wrong scenario of use
  • Manual configuration overhead
  • Perception and vendor approval barriers
Read full review
ScreenShots