Cisco Cloud Email Security vs. Informatica Data Archive (legacy)

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Cisco Cloud Email Security
Score 9.0 out of 10
N/A
Cisco's Cloud Email Security platform is a secure email gateway.N/A
Informatica Data Archive (legacy)
Score 10.0 out of 10
N/A
Informatica Data Archive is used to control data growth in production databases and retire legacy applications. It is a legacy product and will not receive further updates.N/A
Pricing
Cisco Cloud Email SecurityInformatica Data Archive (legacy)
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Cisco Cloud Email SecurityInformatica Data Archive (legacy)
Free Trial
NoNo
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Cisco Cloud Email SecurityInformatica Data Archive (legacy)
Considered Both Products
Cisco Cloud Email Security
Chose Cisco Cloud Email Security
It compares strongly to competitors with the granular protection (with the AI-powered Cisco Talos protection), particularly in large and hybrid environments. There is greater scalability, deeper control, and a high degree of compatibility with our Cisco infrastructure. The …
Chose Cisco Cloud Email Security
I would select Cisco for the Cloud Email Security solution because it has high availability. The integrations you have with solutions in the email cloud are very easy to integrate. Cisco Cloud Email Security is among the leaders in email protection solutions. It is important to …
Chose Cisco Cloud Email Security
Cisco was at least better than or equal to the others but within our budget. It provided all of the services of anti-spam, content filtering, anti-virus, DLP, encrypted email service, scalability, and more than the others. Cisco name and reputation were also key in our decision.
Informatica Data Archive (legacy)
Chose Informatica Data Archive (legacy)
[The] customer support is quite good. Cost also has another point to add, along with process integration and ease of using new tool.
Chose Informatica Data Archive (legacy)
My company currently uses Hadoop for big data management, as well as ParAccel/Matrix databases for storing the data. The combo is fairly effective, and the only reason we are exploring ILM is because of our use of other Informatica products, and looking to build in either …
Features
Cisco Cloud Email SecurityInformatica Data Archive (legacy)
Secure Email Gateway
Comparison of Secure Email Gateway features of Product A and Product B
Cisco Cloud Email Security
8.6
Ratings
2% above category average
Informatica Data Archive (legacy)
-
Ratings
Anti-malware8.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Customizability10.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Data Loss Protection8.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Threat Detection9.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Sandboxing8.00 Ratings00 Ratings
End-to-End Encryption9.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Management Tools8.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Best Alternatives
Cisco Cloud Email SecurityInformatica Data Archive (legacy)
Small Businesses
Zoho Mail
Zoho Mail
Score 9.2 out of 10
Cove Data Protection
Cove Data Protection
Score 8.8 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
Avanan
Avanan
Score 9.9 out of 10
Cove Data Protection
Cove Data Protection
Score 8.8 out of 10
Enterprises
Avanan
Avanan
Score 9.9 out of 10
Microsoft Exchange
Microsoft Exchange
Score 8.7 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
Cisco Cloud Email SecurityInformatica Data Archive (legacy)
Likelihood to Recommend
8.0
(0 ratings)
9.9
(0 ratings)
Support Rating
9.0
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
Cisco Cloud Email SecurityInformatica Data Archive (legacy)
Likelihood to Recommend
The most appropriate scenarios to implement email security is in companies that want to protect the use of electronic mail since it is one of the security breaches that are currently used to perform any type of attack. Very effective integration with Office 365 and it is highly recommended to add the functionality of advanced malware protection
Read full review
To manage users, go to the admin dashboard, here is a section for users. In this users section here you can see which users are configured and you have the ability to suspend a user. If you want to edit or add users, you need to go to the Organization section, then click on another user section there, which then gives you the ability to edit or add users.
Read full review
Pros
  • Incoming mail policies and content filtering are easy to implement.
  • Security aspects of the service are great at filtering out unwanted traffic: anti-spam, anti-virus (Sophos and Mcafee), Cisco AMP, outbreak filters, reputation filtering, etc.).
  • Email tracking through the SMA is a breeze, so if you have specific users that are having problems in the receipt of emails, research into the problem is quick and easy.
  • The reporting is detailed for operations and security functions.
Read full review
  • It's not a major problem, but it's an example of one of many small annoyances.
  • Also, there is no proper documentation available
Read full review
Cons
  • Initial configuration takes time to perform as it is a very powerful solution.
  • Limited context sensitive help.
Read full review
  • No [suggestions for] improvement as such we amazed with the performance and the services
  • Standalone not integrated with power center
Read full review
Support Rating
Cisco TAC support is very good since they have engineers available 24 hours a day, 365 days a year. Important to mention that you must have the support of the solution enabled to be able to receive a response from TAC and that we can be taken care of. The only drawback may be that they will not be able to see settings of the email provider you use.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Alternatives Considered
It compares strongly to competitors with the granular protection (with the AI-powered Cisco Talos protection), particularly in large and hybrid environments. There is greater scalability, deeper control, and a high degree of compatibility with our Cisco infrastructure. The deployment is straightforward in the Cisco environment, so the choice over competitors is pretty clear.
Read full review
My company currently uses Hadoop for big data management, as well as ParAccel/Matrix databases for storing the data. The combo is fairly effective, and the only reason we are exploring ILM is because of our use of other Informatica products, and looking to build in either synergies between the technologies, or cost savings by bundling all our licensing through one vendor (Informatica)
Read full review
Return on Investment
  • Data breaches and data loss can be extremely detrimental to any company. So far this security tool has been a great investment in preventing any form of data compromise.
Read full review
  • Tracking the usage of specific brackets of data across the entire organisation has now become possible.
  • The team was already using PowerCenter. Therefore, using ILM was a very apt decision that allowed easier management of data at the organisation level.
Read full review
ScreenShots