Cisco Cloud Object Storage (COS) vs. Red Hat Virtualization (discontinued)
| Product | Rating | Most Used By | Product Summary | Starting Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Cisco Cloud Object Storage (COS) | Score8 out of 10 | N/A | Cisco Cloud Object Storage (COS) provides distributed, resilient, high-performance storage and retrieval of binary large object (blob) data. Object storage is distributed across a cluster of hardware systems, or nodes. The storage cluster is resilient against hard drive failure within a node and against node failure within a cluster. Nodes can be added to or removed from the cluster to adjust cluster capacity as needed. | N/A |
Red Hat Virtualization (discontinued) | Score6.1 out of 10 | N/A | Red Hat Virtualization (formerly Red Hat Enterprise Virtualization, broadly known as RHEV) is an enterprise level server and desktop virtualization solution. Red Hat Virtualization also contains the functionality of Red Hat Enterprise Virtualization for Desktop in later editions of the platform. | $999 Per Year Per Hypervisor |
| Cisco Cloud Object Storage (COS) | Red Hat Virtualization (discontinued) | |||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Editions & Modules | No answers on this topic |
| ||||||||||||||
| Offerings |
| |||||||||||||||
| Entry-level Setup Fee | No setup fee | No setup fee | ||||||||||||||
| Additional Details | — | — | ||||||||||||||
| More Pricing Information | ||||||||||||||||
| Cisco Cloud Object Storage (COS) | Red Hat Virtualization (discontinued) | |
|---|---|---|
| Considered Both Products | No answer on this topic | No answer on this topic |
| Key User Insights | ||
| Would buy again | ||
100% Would buy again 5 Answers | No answers on this topic | |
| Delivers good value for the price | ||
100% Delivers good value for the price 5 Answers | No answers on this topic | |
| Happy with the feature set | ||
100% Happy with the feature set 5 Answers | No answers on this topic | |
| Lived up to sales and marketing promises | ||
No answers on this topic | No answers on this topic | |
| Implementation went as expected | ||
No answers on this topic | No answers on this topic | |
| Cisco Cloud Object Storage (COS) | Red Hat Virtualization (discontinued) | |||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Server Virtualization |
| |||||||||||||||||||
| Cisco Cloud Object Storage (COS) | Red Hat Virtualization (discontinued) | |
|---|---|---|
| Small Businesses | StarWind Virtual SAN Score9.5 out of 10 | Proxmox VE Score9.2 out of 10 |
| Medium-sized Companies | StarWind Virtual SAN Score9.5 out of 10 | VMware vSOM (discontinued) Score10 out of 10 |
| Enterprises | IBM Storage Scale Score9.9 out of 10 | ![]() IBM PowerVM Score9.6 out of 10 |
| All Alternatives | View all alternatives | View all alternatives |
| Cisco Cloud Object Storage (COS) | Red Hat Virtualization (discontinued) | |
|---|---|---|
| Likelihood to Recommend | 8.0 | 6.6 |
| Usability | 8.0 | - |
| Cisco Cloud Object Storage (COS) | Red Hat Virtualization (discontinued) | |
|---|---|---|
| Likelihood to Recommend |
|
|
| Pros |
|
|
| Cons |
|
|
| Usability |
| No answers on this topic |
| Alternatives Considered |
|
|
| Return on Investment |
|
|
| ScreenShots |





