Cisco Endpoint Security Analytics vs. Cofense Vision

It is well suited in environments where there is a high mail traffic to handle. [Cofense] Vision basically journals the exchange server and keeps a copy of the mail received in the environment. Really beneficial to revoke and quarantine the mail reported by one user, but footprint is there in other mailboxes as well. Less appropriate in the cases where there is no proper segregation of duties within the organization. As it is possible to see contents of the mail. Only authorized personnel should be able to use it.

Incentivized

• AutoQuaratine prevents in advance and eliminates possible malicious emails from users' inboxes.
• [Cofense Vision] optimizes protection against any phishing attack.
• It is simple, friendly and easy to use.
• [Cofense Vision provides] super detailed analysis reports.

Incentivized

• Its cost can be somewhat high when it comes to a small business, so it is perfectly suited to medium or large companies.
• It can throw problems when it comes to migrating said tool in the different versions of an email.
• Its configuration is simple, but it is important to fully understand its operation to give adequate responses to possible threats.
• It would be ideal if it could be integrated with your platform.

Incentivized

Apple of Discord is the pricing as we were looking for an email security tool in reasonable pricing and Barracuda was undoubtedly efficient in action and was compatible with our business but it was highly expensive and then we made up our mind for another tool and Cofense Vision was offering almost the same as Barracuda but cheaper.

Incentivized

• Many Phishing attacks are identified and prevented in an instant.
• Classification of activity helps analysts search and find which emails pose a larger threat.
• User interface and learning is simple and easy to use.

Incentivized