Cisco IPS Sensor (Discontinued) vs. Cisco TrustSec

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Cisco IPS Sensor (Discontinued)
Score 8.9 out of 10
N/A
Cisco IPS Sensors have reached EOL, and EOS.N/A
Cisco TrustSec
Score 7.2 out of 10
N/A
N/AN/A
Pricing
Cisco IPS Sensor (Discontinued)Cisco TrustSec
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Cisco IPS Sensor (Discontinued)Cisco TrustSec
Free Trial
NoNo
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details——
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Cisco IPS Sensor (Discontinued)Cisco TrustSec
Top Pros
Top Cons

No answers on this topic

Best Alternatives
Cisco IPS Sensor (Discontinued)Cisco TrustSec
Small Businesses
AlienVault USM
AlienVault USM
Score 8.0 out of 10
Acronis Cyber Protect Cloud
Acronis Cyber Protect Cloud
Score 8.2 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
CrowdStrike Falcon
CrowdStrike Falcon
Score 9.1 out of 10
Druva Data Resiliency Cloud
Druva Data Resiliency Cloud
Score 9.6 out of 10
Enterprises
CrowdStrike Falcon
CrowdStrike Falcon
Score 9.1 out of 10
Druva Data Resiliency Cloud
Druva Data Resiliency Cloud
Score 9.6 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
Cisco IPS Sensor (Discontinued)Cisco TrustSec
Likelihood to Recommend
9.0
(1 ratings)
9.0
(1 ratings)
Support Rating
9.0
(1 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
Cisco IPS Sensor (Discontinued)Cisco TrustSec
Likelihood to Recommend
Cisco
IPS sensors are more suited for companies that do not have visibility into their network with third-party analyzing tools. Scenarios would be to place IPS sensors at the perimeter firewalls mainly. IPS sensors are less appropriate for companies that have third-party analyzing tools that will mitigate vulnerabilities and malicious traffic and activities already.
Read full review
Cisco
  • Control access to critical enterprise resources by business role, device type, and location, so policy changes can be made without redesigning the network.
  • Easily manage access control and segmentation while maintaining compliance.
  • Create and manage policies in an easy-to-use matrix.
  • Reduce the need for costly network re-architecture by automating firewall rules and access control list (ACL) administration.
Read full review
Pros
Cisco
  • Identifies and blocks malicious traffic.
  • Detects unwanted traffic and allows your company to be proactive, let alone reactive.
  • Comprehensive Threat protection allows companies to adjust thresholds and policies at will.
Read full review
Cisco
  • Reduce operational expenses by simplifying network segmentation and defining security groups based on business roles, not IP addresses.
  • Limit the impact of a data breach by quickly isolating and containing threats using technology already in your network.
Read full review
Cons
Cisco
  • The web GUI is somewhat slow.
  • Sometimes difficult to adjust policies.
  • Fail open feature may not work properly all the time.
Read full review
Cisco
  • Help and solutions if needed, support
Read full review
Support Rating
Cisco
Cisco TAC has been great at helping with configurations and issues that may arise
Read full review
Cisco
No answers on this topic
Alternatives Considered
Cisco
IPS sensors provides the necessary network visibility my company needs to satisfy its security appetite. By doing so, we have been able to stay compliant and up to date with today's network security requirements and procedures. We are able to be proactive with vulnerabilities and reactive to malicious traffic and intrusions in our day to day operations.
Read full review
Cisco
No answers on this topic
Return on Investment
Cisco
  • Provided less need to purchase third party analyzing tools.
  • Needed more dedicated staff to build/review/and maintain policies and such.
  • Answers companies need for network security.
Read full review
Cisco
  • Reduction in IT operational costs
Read full review
ScreenShots