Cisco Jasper vs. Ordr

Using Cisco Jasper is suitable for managing large numbers of cellular subscribers where manual management is impossible. If you are a prototype project with dozens of subscribers, it may not be convenient for you to deal with Cisco Jasper and opt for manual management. The use of Cisco Jasper is justified in a production and project monetization environment.

Incentivized

It works extremely as a monitoring tool and creating access control policies. This function works flawless for us. I do have issues with its other functions such as phishing activity and malware activity. It is being billed as having these great wonderful functions but I have not seen the proof that these actual do anything at all other than have an RNG to make it look like like its doing something. Frankly I am extremely unimpressed with these functions and the lack of transparency from Ordr on how this information is gathered.

• Device integration
• Connectivity management
• Enterprise-grade solution

Incentivized

• Occasionally, it takes a long time for things to load, but that is just a feature.
• There are a few minor glitches, but nothing that affects usage.
• It was assuring security as a vendor-based solution.

In our country, the subscriber management platform is not eligible since each cell phone operator opts for a particular brand, that is, we have not had an option, although we have no complaints about the platform, we feel comfortable using it. I know of other management platforms used by other operators and they are really all very well designed, but we all know about CISCO's track record in the market, which adds additional value.

Incentivized

• We saved an average of 14% on device connectivity costs
• We have an almost 99% uptime thanks to CJ.

Incentivized