Cisco Jasper vs. Varuna

Using Cisco Jasper is suitable for managing large numbers of cellular subscribers where manual management is impossible. If you are a prototype project with dozens of subscribers, it may not be convenient for you to deal with Cisco Jasper and opt for manual management. The use of Cisco Jasper is justified in a production and project monetization environment.

Incentivized

It analyses in a great way to collect and display operational and of course relevant business data allowing users to predict a large number of issues, especially quality ones. Reports can be generated just after a few clicks. Machine learning capabilities bring some additional benefits of efficiency and help to the end-users.

Incentivized

• Device integration
• Connectivity management
• Enterprise-grade solution

Incentivized

• Occasionally, it takes a long time for things to load, but that is just a feature.
• There are a few minor glitches, but nothing that affects usage.
• It was assuring security as a vendor-based solution.

• Mobile functionality
• Responsive design
• Better stat tools

Incentivized

In our country, the subscriber management platform is not eligible since each cell phone operator opts for a particular brand, that is, we have not had an option, although we have no complaints about the platform, we feel comfortable using it. I know of other management platforms used by other operators and they are really all very well designed, but we all know about CISCO's track record in the market, which adds additional value.

Incentivized

• We saved an average of 14% on device connectivity costs
• We have an almost 99% uptime thanks to CJ.

Incentivized

• Less time spent on the tool
• Good feedback
• The tool has great analytics

Incentivized