Cisco Jasper vs. Watson IoT Platform

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Cisco Jasper
Score 6.9 out of 10
N/A
Cisco Jasper is a global Internet of Things (IoT) platform. The product helps companies launch, manage and monetize connected IoT services to drive business transformation and deliver innovative connected services.N/A
Watson IoT Platform
Score 8.5 out of 10
N/A
The IBM Watson IoT Platform is an Internet-of-things is a managed cloud-hosted solution supporting device connectivity, control, visualization, and overall device visibility and management. It provides a UI where users can add and manage devices, control access to IoT service, and monitor usage. With its device management service, users can perform device actions like rebooting or updating firmware, receive device diagnostics and metadata, or perform bulk device addition and removal.N/A
Pricing
Cisco JasperWatson IoT Platform
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Cisco JasperWatson IoT Platform
Free Trial
NoNo
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details——
More Pricing Information
Features
Cisco JasperWatson IoT Platform
Internet of Things
Comparison of Internet of Things features of Product A and Product B
Cisco Jasper
8.1
3 Ratings
2% above category average
Watson IoT Platform
-
Ratings
IoT Device Management8.43 Ratings00 Ratings
Device Security8.43 Ratings00 Ratings
IoT Data Management8.23 Ratings00 Ratings
IoT Analytics7.53 Ratings00 Ratings
IoT Integration7.83 Ratings00 Ratings
Best Alternatives
Cisco JasperWatson IoT Platform
Small Businesses
AWS IoT Core
AWS IoT Core
Score 7.7 out of 10
Portainer
Portainer
Score 9.3 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies

No answers on this topic

No answers on this topic

Enterprises
AWS IoT Core
AWS IoT Core
Score 7.7 out of 10

No answers on this topic

All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
Cisco JasperWatson IoT Platform
Likelihood to Recommend
8.2
(3 ratings)
8.4
(2 ratings)
User Testimonials
Cisco JasperWatson IoT Platform
Likelihood to Recommend
Cisco
Using Cisco Jasper is suitable for managing large numbers of cellular subscribers where manual management is impossible. If you are a prototype project with dozens of subscribers, it may not be convenient for you to deal with Cisco Jasper and opt for manual management. The use of Cisco Jasper is justified in a production and project monetization environment.
Read full review
IBM
For large companies with large-scale manufacturing, electronics management, and infrastructures that require lots of maintenance, IBM Watson IoT is a must-have. It greatly increases performance, decreases downtime, and is an all-around great management dashboard. This is best for infrastructures that have a larger infrastructures of IoT devices in an enterprise/manufacturing setting, otherwise IBM Watson may not bring many benefits to your team.
Read full review
Pros
Cisco
  • Device integration
  • Connectivity management
  • Enterprise-grade solution
Read full review
IBM
  • The asset information is available in both static and dynamic format (from thermal images, to OEM data, to time series data). The ability to ingest all the information using a single platform has great value.
  • Another benefit is a seamless integration with Maximo. This has been a challenge with other 3rd party systems available.
  • The experience of IBM Maximo systems updates is positive.
Read full review
Cons
Cisco
  • Occasionally, it takes a long time for things to load, but that is just a feature.
  • There are a few minor glitches, but nothing that affects usage.
  • It was assuring security as a vendor-based solution.
Read full review
IBM
  • Some of the tutorials could use a little more improvement - While there is a considerable amount of documentation, most of the good documentation for Watson IoT we found to be from third-parties.
  • Administration and billing tools could use a bit more improvement - The UI is a bit clunky and poorly-designed here.
  • Be prepared to work with IBM support to get this going - Their turn-around support for inquiries can be lengthy, and setup time may also be quite lengthy because of this.
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
Cisco
In our country, the subscriber management platform is not eligible since each cell phone operator opts for a particular brand, that is, we have not had an option, although we have no complaints about the platform, we feel comfortable using it. I know of other management platforms used by other operators and they are really all very well designed, but we all know about CISCO's track record in the market, which adds additional value.
Read full review
IBM
Predix has recently launched their Asset Performance management Unified system. I am keen to see how it stacks up against Watson.
Read full review
Return on Investment
Cisco
  • We saved an average of 14% on device connectivity costs
  • We have an almost 99% uptime thanks to CJ.
Read full review
IBM
  • Positive - This tool greatly increases most company's manufacturing and production efficiency, and the use-cases are extensive. It was a great way of decreasing down-time for us.
  • Negative - Took lots of work and energy to get up and running, we had to rely on IBM support and tutorials many times during this process.
  • Positive - Quite cheap, most of the tiers of pricing cost very little, and it's possible to use Watson IoT for a few months for free to see if it is beneficial for your company.
Read full review
ScreenShots