Cisco Meraki vMX vs. Hyper Private Access

I think for us in our deployment model where it spoke to the hub, it certainly makes ideal sense. I would probably say with anyone that's signed in Azure or a cloud platform, obviously VMX appliance may not be suited. Anyone on Old Legacy MPLS may struggle to see a purpose for SD-WAN overlay of the top. But I think if you really want to introduce network communications that are low cost effective, solid in terms of availability and performance, a Meraki sdwan solution with the VMX appliance in the cloud is ideal.

Incentivized

It is not necessary for a call center to use a secure network, but network admins need HPA. The reasoning behind this is that securing private access is so important.

Incentivized

• Works well with physical Meraki MX devices
• Site-to-Site VPNs are easy to set up with other Meraki devices
• Cisco Meraki vMX provides a great solution for a virtual environment, like Azure

Incentivized

• Zero Trust Access.
• Business VPN.
• Local Area Network on Public Network.
• Secure Private Network.

Incentivized

• Client VPN: Cisco Meraki vMX in general needs to implement multiple VPN profiles/ group policies for client VPN
• Alerts: Cisco Meraki vMX in general should be more consistent in sending alerts. We should receive alarms instantly.
• Event logs: More in-depth event logs for all Meraki products, such as system crashes, etc.

Incentivized

• Customer Relation Management.
• SharePoint.
• Active Directory.

Incentivized

The VMware SD wan does give some better WAN metrics, but the interface is super clunky and doesn’t support a full stack. If Meraki could give some more QoE link metrics, it would be perfect.

Incentivized

Features and ease of implementation. Unlike other options, Hyper Private Access offers comprehensive protection for sensitive data while being user-friendly, which was a crucial factor in our decision-making process. It stands out due to its scalability and flexibility when comparing Hyper Private Access to alternative solutions. Unlike competing products, Hyper Private Access adapts seamlessly to the evolving needs of our business, allowing for effortless expansion and customization as our requirements change over time. Hyper Private Access outperforms its counterparts by providing unparalleled reliability and uptime. While evaluating various options, we found that Hyper Private Access consistently delivers uninterrupted access to critical resources, minimizing downtime and ensuring uninterrupted operations, which was a crucial factor in our selection process.

Incentivized

We have over 350 locations and growing. We chose Cisco Meraki vMX because of ease of use and how it scales.

Incentivized

• Some users it knocks down on maintenance labor/cost
• Negative would be if you didn't really vet the feature set to the customers needs and end up having to replace it short notice.

Incentivized

• Positive impact: With the implementation of Hyper Private Access, the financial performance of our business has significantly improved. Enhancing access to sensitive resources and information has improved our performance, increasing ROI and greater productivity.
• Negative impact: Hyper Private Access appears to have had no adverse effect on our overall business objectives. However, the results obtained through ROI measurements indicate that this technology cannot achieve significant results and has created less productivity.
• Positive impact: Hyper Private Access has directly contributed to improving the efficiency and effectiveness of our business operations. By enhancing the security of sensitive data and improving access to it, we have successfully reduced risks and increased the speed of strategic decision-making, directly leading to improved financial performance and overall ROI of our business.

Incentivized