Cisco Optical Networking vs. Colasoft Capsa

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Cisco Optical Networking
Score 8.8 out of 10
N/A
Cisco Optical Networking is a suite of products supporting data center networking, including the NCS 1000, 2000, 4000, 4200, and the Cisco Evolved Programmable Network Manager (Cisco EPN Manager), as well as Cisco ONS 15000 series platforms and devices.N/A
Colasoft Capsa
Score 9.0 out of 10
N/A
Colasoft Capsa is a network performance monitoring and protocol analyzing tool. Capsa provides core monitoring features, as well as automated diagnostics and packet decoding. Colasoft offers a limited free version of the software.N/A
Pricing
Cisco Optical NetworkingColasoft Capsa
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Cisco Optical NetworkingColasoft Capsa
Free Trial
NoNo
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
YesNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Cisco Optical NetworkingColasoft Capsa
Best Alternatives
Cisco Optical NetworkingColasoft Capsa
Small Businesses

No answers on this topic

Auvik
Auvik
Score 8.5 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
Dell PowerConnect Switches (discontinued)
Dell PowerConnect Switches (discontinued)
Score 8.1 out of 10
PingPlotter
PingPlotter
Score 9.2 out of 10
Enterprises
Cisco Nexus Series Switches
Cisco Nexus Series Switches
Score 9.3 out of 10
PingPlotter
PingPlotter
Score 9.2 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
Cisco Optical NetworkingColasoft Capsa
Likelihood to Recommend
8.0
(11 ratings)
9.0
(1 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
7.3
(1 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Usability
7.8
(4 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Support Rating
8.2
(1 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
Cisco Optical NetworkingColasoft Capsa
Likelihood to Recommend
Cisco
Based on my experience, I think it's a goldmine for the experienced professional and a hectic job for newbies. I recommend newbies to have some experience and then jump to Cisco Optical Networking so that they can easily understand what they paid for and take the best out of it. It's best for network scalability so I highly recommend it to those who intend to scale their network in the near future however, if you know that your network will remain the same and you don't require it, there are cheaper options within Cisco.
Read full review
Colasoft
Capsa is highly recommended to be used in small dense areas of a network where it makes sense to be able to run analytics off of a mirror port to gain insight into traffic trends. It is a costly product to install in branch locations, and requires a decent spec hardware to run appropriately
Read full review
Pros
Cisco
  • Makes use of limited fiber effectively.
  • Allows for the deployment of smart P2P MPLS links that automatically re-route around outages.
  • Simplifies the overhead of managing multiple technologies by converging the technologies.
Read full review
Colasoft
  • Robust Application. Able to handle traffic that most businesses will throw at it.
  • Easy to use. Easy to setup captures and filter down to specific traffic types.
  • Relatively cheap for what it's able to accomplish.
Read full review
Cons
Cisco
  • A simplified management platform that provides services without having to invest In multiple products, each with an additional cost. The product should just come with the services and features.
  • Simplifying the BOM selection process. There are to many hidden part numbers you need to know.
Read full review
Colasoft
  • Needs options to scale to 10Gb/s networks. The cutoff for performance looks to be around 3Gb/sl
  • Needs API access to trigger capturesl
  • Needs Agents for remote capturesl
Read full review
Likelihood to Renew
Cisco
We will renew our use of Cisco Optical Networking due to its reliability in maintaining high-performance, low-latency connections, its scalability in supporting growing bandwidth demands, and its integration with existing Cisco infrastructure, which simplifies management and reduces operational complexity. Additionally, its robust security features and automation capabilities have enhanced network resilience, making it a valuable long-term solution for our expanding needs.
Read full review
Colasoft
No answers on this topic
Usability
Cisco
It just works depending on what your requirement is. Cisco also provides a well formed cheat sheet on which gear to use for which scenario. Very convenient. It makes my job as a Sales Engineer easier when I have a short timeline to get a solution designed. It is also build well enough to be used in austere environments.
Read full review
Colasoft
No answers on this topic
Support Rating
Cisco
I would rate the overall support for Cisco Optical Networking at 9/10. The support team is highly responsive, knowledgeable, and effective in resolving issues quickly. Cisco’s comprehensive online resources, documentation, and community forums also make it easy to find solutions. However, there is always room for improvement in terms of response time during peak periods.
Read full review
Colasoft
No answers on this topic
Alternatives Considered
Cisco
We selected Cisco Optical Networking after evaluating alternatives such as Ciena, Nokia, and Infinera. Cisco stood out for its seamless integration with our existing network infrastructure, which already relied heavily on Cisco solutions. This made deployment and management significantly easier. The Cisco NCS 2000 series offered flexible ROADM capabilities, allowing us to scale bandwidth dynamically without extensive infrastructure changes. Additionally, Cisco’s Evolved Programmable Network Manager (EPNM) provided intuitive management and automation, streamlining provisioning and monitoring tasks. While Ciena’s WaveLogic Ai impressed us with its adaptive modulation and Nokia’s 1830 PSS offered strong scalability, both required more complex configurations that didn’t align as well with our existing setup. Infinera’s GX Series excelled in long-haul capacity, but Cisco’s modular design better suited our evolving bandwidth needs. Ultimately, Cisco Optical Networking provided the best combination of scalability, integration ease, and operational efficiency, making it the ideal choice for our organization.
Read full review
Colasoft
Colasoft performs more like the traditional wireshark as opposed to other solutions that tend to focus on graphs instead of giving you the raw data. I personally prefer the raw data, and then the ability to build graphs upon this (which Capsa can do). This allows for quicker analysis and makes it easier to relate to.
Read full review
Return on Investment
Cisco
  • The best impact it had was to lower my network maintenance cost by the time span of more than a year
  • It might look a bit pricey at the beginning, but along with time, you'll feel that you're actually saving a lot of your time and money in terms of network management
Read full review
Colasoft
  • While the product doesn't detect malware, it has helped track down malware infected machines by using data from other applications to run filters to look for known traffic destinations for that malware. For me this is a huge ROI since malware can be the great unknown.
  • Relatively cheap compared to the feature set.
Read full review
ScreenShots

Cisco Optical Networking Screenshots

Screenshot of Cisco Network Convergence System 2006Screenshot of Cisco Network Convergence System 2006Screenshot of Cisco Network Convergence System 2006