Works as expected
September 03, 2021
Works as expected
Score 9 out of 10
- Cisco Network Convergence System 2000 Series
- Cisco Network Convergence System 4000 Series
Overall Satisfaction with Cisco Optical Networking
[The] Cisco Optical Networking equipment we use are usually related to DWDM. It is used mostly to connect sites when fiber availability is low. It is usually managed by a couple of teams, but it covers many services managed by more than a dozen teams in our organization. It helps us reduce the cost of fiber installs.
- Convergence of IP and optical networking
- Port scalability especially using 400G ports
- Packet optical solution
- Bugs on software IOS XR
- Migration from legacy gears
- Cost of NCS and new gen is too steep compared to competitors
- Evpn superior convergence
- End-to-end service orchestration
- Recent QSFP-DD has helped with line card port density
- Reduced price/port has helped to increase capacity
- Cheaper port cost has enhanced more redundancy and lesser downtime
- Optical Network management has lowered man-power for maintenance
Do you think Cisco Optical Networking delivers good value for the price?
Are you happy with Cisco Optical Networking's feature set?
Did Cisco Optical Networking live up to sales and marketing promises?
I wasn't involved with the selection/purchase process
Did implementation of Cisco Optical Networking go as expected?
Would you buy Cisco Optical Networking again?
Cisco Optical Networking solutions typically does well in long-range DWDM installs, and with recent improvements with IP/Optical convergence, it might be a good solution for EVPN leaf-spine architecture. We think it is not appropriate for edge installs which require mux and demux, as it is not very cost-effective.