Cisco Secure Access vs. Lookout SASE

Cisco Secure Access seems well suited to larger organisations with multiple sites and hybrid work-force. Not so well suited to organisations that have a small number of sites where the majority of users are on-premises and key applications are delivered locally (i.e., not cloud)

Incentivized

Lookout SASE is well suited for businesses with a handful of employees that are tying to keep their mobile devices secure on the internet. If your employees aren't using the web or interacting with emails Lookout SASE would be less appropriate. Lookout SASE has prevented employees several times from downloading or accessing malicious sites.

Incentivized

• Simple implementation of a Meraki SD WAN solution
• Simple implementation of one of zero trust clients
• Simple implementation of one of secure clients

Incentivized

• VNP
• Defined reports
• Blocking suspicious content.

Incentivized

• For now there is everything we need

Incentivized

• Lookout SASE could improve on the ease of adding users to the platform.
• A management app could be useful.
• PC integration.

Incentivized

Cisco Secure Access provided all the functionality we required and was also competitively priced.

Incentivized

Workspace ONE is a whole gorilla compared to Lookout SASE. Compared
to Lookout SASE it is extremely easy to use and to add devices.
Workspace ONE has a lot of features but is extremely hard to use and
with a lot of errors. I would still recommend other MDM's instead of
Workspace One.

Incentivized

• Scaling a secure VPN solution from a large number of users
• Cloud-based administration possible from anywhere
• Good logging and monitoring functionality

Incentivized

• Long run security
• Device protection
• Network Protection

Incentivized