Overall Satisfaction with Cisco Secure Access
A negative point to note is that the data center resources are hosted via AWS. There can be performance problems. A lot of work is currently being done in Cisco Secure Access, so problems and bugs can often occur. Otherwise, the solution is ingenious, simple implementation, and a good concept.
- Simple implementation of a Meraki SD WAN solution
- Simple implementation of one of zero trust clients
- Simple implementation of one of secure clients
- The integration into the Meraki dashboard is not yet complete, you have to use several interfaces to complete the configuration, the services should be fully integrated to provide better handling
- Integration of firewall rules onprem and cloud should be standardized
- Better user management / import
- Scaling a secure VPN solution from a large number of users
- Cloud-based administration possible from anywhere
- Good logging and monitoring functionality
Firewall from the cloud simplifies the management and operation of the overall solution, I have no resource problems and can scale well. I can fall back on cloud redundancy and the systems are accessible at all times.
Do you think Cisco Secure Access delivers good value for the price?
Yes
Are you happy with Cisco Secure Access's feature set?
Yes
Did Cisco Secure Access live up to sales and marketing promises?
Yes
Did implementation of Cisco Secure Access go as expected?
Yes
Would you buy Cisco Secure Access again?
Yes