Cisco Secure Access
February 07, 2024

Cisco Secure Access

Peter Muchau | TrustRadius Reviewer
Score 9 out of 10
Vetted Review
Verified User

Overall Satisfaction with Cisco Secure Access

A negative point to note is that the data center resources are hosted via AWS. There can be performance problems. A lot of work is currently being done in Cisco Secure Access, so problems and bugs can often occur. Otherwise, the solution is ingenious, simple implementation, and a good concept.
  • Simple implementation of a Meraki SD WAN solution
  • Simple implementation of one of zero trust clients
  • Simple implementation of one of secure clients
  • The integration into the Meraki dashboard is not yet complete, you have to use several interfaces to complete the configuration, the services should be fully integrated to provide better handling
  • Integration of firewall rules onprem and cloud should be standardized
  • Better user management / import
  • Scaling a secure VPN solution from a large number of users
  • Cloud-based administration possible from anywhere
  • Good logging and monitoring functionality
Firewall from the cloud simplifies the management and operation of the overall solution, I have no resource problems and can scale well. I can fall back on cloud redundancy and the systems are accessible at all times.

Do you think Cisco Secure Access delivers good value for the price?

Yes

Are you happy with Cisco Secure Access's feature set?

Yes

Did Cisco Secure Access live up to sales and marketing promises?

Yes

Did implementation of Cisco Secure Access go as expected?

Yes

Would you buy Cisco Secure Access again?

Yes

Cisco 4000 Series Integrated Services Routers (ISR 4000), Cisco Firepower 2100 Series, Cisco Meraki MG
Simple administration and integration into the existing solution (client VPN), Meraki SD WAN, cloud services. The solution offers centralized management via the cloud, the interaction of the MX is good and the implementation saves time.