Cisco Secure Access.
September 29, 2025
Cisco Secure Access.
Score 9 out of 10
Vetted Review
Verified User
Overall Satisfaction with Cisco Secure Access
We use this as the primary SWG. This provides for DNS Category blocks, Application Control Blocks, and more granular web blocking. We also use this for DLP, and we can use user groups to allow or block access to the relevant items that we require.
Pros
- SWG
- Application Control.
- Granular control based on users or groups.
Cons
- Easier management of policies.
- More detailed and accurate reporting.
- Easier identification and categorisation of applications.
- Improved decryption handling and management of WAFs blocking access.
- Prevent access to malicious content, which has proven to be useful.
- We have reduced appliance count and maintenance as this is a fully cloud based solution.
- Lightweight agent that doesn't consume too many resources from the client machines.
- ability to make changes and have them deployed to agents quickly.
We selected Cisco Secure Access due to the intuitive GUI and ease of use. The agent deployment was simple and easy to maintain. Any additional updates or changes were quickly deployed, and users found the customized block messages useful. From analytics and management, the Secure Access Product has been simple to manage and provides a robust level of security and flexibility that we haven't found in any other product yet.
Do you think Cisco Secure Access delivers good value for the price?
Yes
Are you happy with Cisco Secure Access's feature set?
Yes
Did Cisco Secure Access live up to sales and marketing promises?
Yes
Did implementation of Cisco Secure Access go as expected?
Yes
Would you buy Cisco Secure Access again?
Yes
Comments
Please log in to join the conversation