Cisco Secure Workload vs. Netskope Private Access

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Cisco Secure Workload
Score 8.0 out of 10
N/A
The Cisco Secure Workload (formerly Tetration) platform offers holistic workload protection for multicloud data centers by enabling a zero-trust model using segmentation. This approach allows users to identify security incidents faster, contain lateral movement, and reduce the attack surface. Tetration's infrastructure-agnostic approach supports both on-premises and public cloud workloads.N/A
Netskope Private Access
Score 9.2 out of 10
N/A
Netskope Private Access is a zero trust access solution, that allows users to provide remote access to applications running in the public cloud and private data center environments, and avoid the need for remote users to use a VPN through the corporate network to gain access to private applications.N/A
Pricing
Cisco Secure WorkloadNetskope Private Access
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Cisco Secure WorkloadNetskope Private Access
Free Trial
NoNo
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
YesNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional DetailsCisco Secure Workload software is licensed based on the number of workload equivalents or devices (endpoints) depending on the agent or sensor type being used. Telemetry data can be collected using agents, supported by other supported sensors or collectors, in any combination. Policy enforcement is enabled through agents with enforcement capability with infrastructure enforcement delivered through Cisco Secure Firewall Integration, Application Delivery Controllers (ADCs), and Security Groups in public cloud infrastructure or orchestrated via streamed Kafka policy. Workload is defined as a virtual machine, bare-metal server, or container host and includes server and desktop operating systems.
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Cisco Secure WorkloadNetskope Private Access
Features
Cisco Secure WorkloadNetskope Private Access
Identity Management
Comparison of Identity Management features of Product A and Product B
Cisco Secure Workload
-
Ratings
Netskope Private Access
10.0
2 Ratings
12% above category average
Multi-Factor Authentication00 Ratings10.02 Ratings
Endpoint Security
Comparison of Endpoint Security features of Product A and Product B
Cisco Secure Workload
-
Ratings
Netskope Private Access
7.5
3 Ratings
19% below category average
Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR)00 Ratings7.53 Ratings
Threat Intelligence
Comparison of Threat Intelligence features of Product A and Product B
Cisco Secure Workload
-
Ratings
Netskope Private Access
6.8
4 Ratings
13% below category average
Network Analytics00 Ratings7.04 Ratings
Threat Recognition00 Ratings7.04 Ratings
Vulnerability Classification00 Ratings7.04 Ratings
Automated Alerts and Reporting00 Ratings7.74 Ratings
Threat Analysis00 Ratings6.04 Ratings
Threat Intelligence Reporting00 Ratings6.74 Ratings
Automated Threat Identification00 Ratings6.34 Ratings
Zero Trust Security
Comparison of Zero Trust Security features of Product A and Product B
Cisco Secure Workload
-
Ratings
Netskope Private Access
7.8
4 Ratings
11% below category average
Continuous Verification00 Ratings8.04 Ratings
Secure Web Gateways00 Ratings8.04 Ratings
Network Flow Control00 Ratings7.34 Ratings
Network Traffic Analysis00 Ratings9.04 Ratings
Segmentation Leveraging00 Ratings6.74 Ratings
Admin Access Control00 Ratings9.04 Ratings
Network Data Encryption00 Ratings7.34 Ratings
Network Topology Mapping00 Ratings7.03 Ratings
Best Alternatives
Cisco Secure WorkloadNetskope Private Access
Small Businesses

No answers on this topic

ThreatLocker
ThreatLocker
Score 9.4 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies

No answers on this topic

Palo Alto Networks Prisma Access
Palo Alto Networks Prisma Access
Score 8.3 out of 10
Enterprises

No answers on this topic

Palo Alto Networks Prisma Access
Palo Alto Networks Prisma Access
Score 8.3 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
Cisco Secure WorkloadNetskope Private Access
Likelihood to Recommend
7.3
(1 ratings)
9.5
(3 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
-
(0 ratings)
8.0
(1 ratings)
Usability
-
(0 ratings)
9.0
(2 ratings)
Support Rating
-
(0 ratings)
5.0
(1 ratings)
Implementation Rating
-
(0 ratings)
8.0
(1 ratings)
User Testimonials
Cisco Secure WorkloadNetskope Private Access
Likelihood to Recommend
Cisco
The biggest challenge with this product is it crosses lines. You need somebody who can support servers as well as somebody who supports the infrastructure. And that's usually two different jobs, two different job titles, two different departments. So if you have a lot of silos within your organization and you have groups that don't work particularly well together between the server team and the network team, you will have problems developing and working on this product. If your server team and your network team work well together, then you'll have a lot fewer problems, it'll work pretty well. But if your server team and your network team are like oil and water don't bother.
Read full review
Netskope
For more suitable scenarios, it is more flexible to deploy NPA with granular access to third-party vendors and contractors. works well in hybrid and multi-cloud private application access. good use cases with DLP, logging, and zero trust. we required improvement if the customer needs full network layer access, as some of the legacy applications may need full network access. also, can we achieve better performance for latency-sensitive or real-time traffic like voice, video?
Read full review
Pros
Cisco
No answers on this topic
Netskope
  • It enables remote users to connect the on premise or cloud hosted application.
  • It overcomes the drawbacks of VPN.
  • It only allows the genuine user to access the application.
Read full review
Cons
Cisco
No answers on this topic
Netskope
  • When a blocking alert pops up, the user could click to request it be enabled, making it easier to create the policy.
Read full review
Likelihood to Renew
Cisco
No answers on this topic
Netskope
We are delighted with everything they are adding and how the product is growing.
Read full review
Usability
Cisco
No answers on this topic
Netskope
As I said before, I find it´s UI very intuitive and it´s very easy to use and configure, everything is where it should be and allows for a good workflow. For the end user it´s only a login page that pops out automatically and close itself once it´s authenticated so it stay out of the way of the user.
Read full review
Support Rating
Cisco
No answers on this topic
Netskope
The support is good, but the problem is that even if you indicate that you prefer support in Spanish, the application indicates that it is available. I have never had a technician who spoke to me in Spanish.
Read full review
Implementation Rating
Cisco
No answers on this topic
Netskope
The process was smooth and well managed.
There was probably good technical coordination and support.
There were only minor details that could be improved.
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
Cisco
No answers on this topic
Netskope
Read full review
Return on Investment
Cisco
No answers on this topic
Netskope
  • Re-authentication improves the security.
  • Application access is more stable.
  • Due to frequent publisher upgrade user unable to connect the application.
Read full review
ScreenShots

Cisco Secure Workload Screenshots

Screenshot of Secure Workload DashboardScreenshot of Secure Workload Policy CanvasScreenshot of Secure Workload Flow Logs and Telemetry