Cisco Secure Workload vs. RedSeal

The biggest challenge with this product is it crosses lines. You need somebody who can support servers as well as somebody who supports the infrastructure. And that's usually two different jobs, two different job titles, two different departments. So if you have a lot of silos within your organization and you have groups that don't work particularly well together between the server team and the network team, you will have problems developing and working on this product. If your server team and your network team work well together, then you'll have a lot fewer problems, it'll work pretty well. But if your server team and your network team are like oil and water don't bother.

Incentivized

RedSeal is a great tool for audit and compliance. It can do configuration analysis, audit against "golden" configurations, and map a network with little user interaction. RedSeal is not great for an environment where a tool like this must be fully integrated into not only audit and compliance, but also into change management.

Incentivized

• RedSeal is great for compliance
• RedSeal is a great tool for path investigation and risk analysis
• RedSeal has a great network model/map

Incentivized

• Next-generation firewall support
• Change management process integration

Incentivized

RedSeal outperforms both Skybox and Tufin in the area of audit and compliance and can work with aging firewall technologies (stateful firewalls) and network gear (routers and switches). It is better than Tufin in respect to next-generation firewall assessments but is behind Skybox in this area. RedSeal also lacks change management integration which both Skybox and Tufin have.

Incentivized

• RedSeal will provide positive ROI for its ease of compliance and audit reviews
• RedSeal will provide positive ROI for network documentation and path analysis

Incentivized