Cisco Software-Defined Access (SD-Access) vs. Juniper Contrail Networking

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Cisco SD-Access
Score 8.7 out of 10
N/A
Cisco's Software-Defined Access (SD-Access) provides automated end-to-end segmentation to separate user, device and application traffic without redesigning the network. Cisco SD-Access automates user access policy so organizations can make sure the right policies are established for any user or device with any application across the network.N/A
Contrail Networking
Score 7.7 out of 10
N/A
Juniper Networks supports SDN with Contrail Networking, a solution that provides dynamic end-to-end networking policy and control for any cloud, any workload, NFV, and any deployment, from a single user interface. It translates abstract workflows into specific policies, simplifying the orchestration of virtual overlay connectivity across all environments.N/A
Pricing
Cisco Software-Defined Access (SD-Access)Juniper Contrail Networking
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Cisco SD-AccessContrail Networking
Free Trial
NoNo
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details——
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Cisco Software-Defined Access (SD-Access)Juniper Contrail Networking
Top Pros
Top Cons
Best Alternatives
Cisco Software-Defined Access (SD-Access)Juniper Contrail Networking
Small Businesses

No answers on this topic

No answers on this topic

Medium-sized Companies
Cisco ACI
Cisco ACI
Score 8.5 out of 10
Cisco ACI
Cisco ACI
Score 8.5 out of 10
Enterprises
Cisco ACI
Cisco ACI
Score 8.5 out of 10
Cisco ACI
Cisco ACI
Score 8.5 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
Cisco Software-Defined Access (SD-Access)Juniper Contrail Networking
Likelihood to Recommend
5.2
(8 ratings)
8.5
(2 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
1.0
(1 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Support Rating
4.6
(8 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
Cisco Software-Defined Access (SD-Access)Juniper Contrail Networking
Likelihood to Recommend
Cisco
It's well suited in our corporate offices, where all our business users resides and where we can control all their accesses. What doesn't really fit well is when we have our branch fronts, where all the software domain access features aren't utilized to its fullest, due to the fact that customers and users don't really need to have all the security features that SDA provides.
Read full review
Juniper Networks
Best for: - Data Center Networking - NFVI Cloud Networking - Virtual Private Cloud for CSP
Read full review
Pros
Cisco
  • Automation, pushing template-based configuration to multiple devices in one push saves time and manpower.
  • Assurance [helps trace] issues related to devices, clients, and provide the troubleshoot as [the] best practices.
  • Segmentation, with the use of the SGT tags, we are able to achieve segmentation and micro-segmentation securely.
Read full review
Juniper Networks
  • Contrail Networking automates network resource.
  • Providing reliability and agility while extending visibility into your multi-cloud network.
  • Advanced analytics capabilities.
Read full review
Cons
Cisco
  • Documentation: Working in this solution I realized there were missing information details about the fusion device support for nexus.
  • Fusion router: This roll in the fabric should be already integrated in the solution, right now it is configured manually.
  • Bugs: Unfortunately the solution still present a lot of bugs, mainly in the controller.
Read full review
Juniper Networks
  • Contrail should have inbuild management of underlay network as well
  • lack of open resources to learn
Read full review
Support Rating
Cisco
As far as my experience with SD-Access -I'd say things that can be improved are - better functionality with ISE, ease to understand licensing and better documentation for configuration (add-ons, etc), and licensing.
Read full review
Juniper Networks
No answers on this topic
Alternatives Considered
Cisco
Automation, pushing template-based configuration to multiple devices in one push saves time and manpower. Assurance helps trace issues related to devices, clients, and provide the troubleshoot as the best practices. Segmentation, with the use of the SGT tags, we are able to achieve segmentation and micro-segmentation securely.
Read full review
Juniper Networks
The platforms are very similar in networking concepts, at the interface level I found it easier to use Juniper Contrail than Cisco ACI. And at the cost level, I think it is cheaper.
Read full review
Return on Investment
Cisco
  • Integration with other platforms in a single platform is a great advantage for the user.
  • Saves time in configuring devices on the network
Read full review
Juniper Networks
  • Core of our NFV Cloud providing Multitenant Services
  • Give Agility to our Cloud
  • Wrokload any IP, anywhere
Read full review
ScreenShots