#SDA shaking trust in Cisco
Updated March 14, 2025

#SDA shaking trust in Cisco

Anonymous | TrustRadius Reviewer
Score 8 out of 10
Vetted Review
Verified User

Overall Satisfaction with Cisco Software-Defined Access (SD-Access)

I am using SDA in part of my Campus infrastructure. It supposed to be easier to administrate , fewer manpower, it turns out the the solution need a dedicated team to deal with all the bugs.

Pros

  • Automation for daily activities (DNA)
  • Telemetry (DNA)

Cons

  • NOT Micro segmentation for Broadcast and multicast
  • NOT Supporting Multicast over SD transit
  • NOT Supporting silent host
  • Demanding advantage license
  • The LCM become bloody expensive
  • Cisco Identity Services Engine (ISE)
It helps with 802.1X
I get different answers from the CX, whole bunch of TAX cases. Unclear roadmap

Do you think Cisco Software-Defined Access (SD-Access) delivers good value for the price?

No

Are you happy with Cisco Software-Defined Access (SD-Access)'s feature set?

No

Did Cisco Software-Defined Access (SD-Access) live up to sales and marketing promises?

No

Did implementation of Cisco Software-Defined Access (SD-Access) go as expected?

No

Would you buy Cisco Software-Defined Access (SD-Access) again?

No

I dont see the point to use VXLAN in a campus environment that dont have the need of stretched L2 environment (fully aware about VXLAN header and SGTs ) LISP and BGP Crave a advantage licenses (extremely expansive )

Using Cisco Software-Defined Access (SD-Access)

16 - The total number of end users using a SDA network is about 2500.
7 - Network operation team , campus network experience (routing, switching , ISE)
  • ZTP
  • Segmentation
  • standardized configuration
  • SGT/Segmentation
  • Assurance and troubleshooting

Evaluating Cisco Software-Defined Access (SD-Access) and Competitors

Yes - A traditional Layer 2 (L2) campus network based on HPE (Hewlett Packard Enterprise) networking equipment follows a hierarchical design consisting of Access, Distribution, and Core layers.
  • Ease of Use
  • Other
Automation , ease to use , elimination of L2 and spanning tree
To implement an eBGP-VXLAN EVPN network using Cisco hardware, with an automation framework powered by Ansible

Cisco Software-Defined Access (SD-Access) Implementation

At the beginning, we had to open a TAC case for every single step during the implementation phase.
  • Implemented in-house
  • Third-party professional services
Cisco CX
Change management was a big part of the implementation and was well-handled
  • Complexity
  • License related questions

Cisco Software-Defined Access (SD-Access) Training

  • Online Training
  • In-Person Training
I rated the training an 8 because overall, it was well-structured, and the instructor was highly knowledgeable on the subject matter. The content was relevant, and I appreciated the clear explanations of complex topics. However, I felt that some sections were covered too quickly, making it difficult to fully absorb the information before moving on. Additionally, I would have liked more time dedicated to Q&A, as there were moments when I had questions but didn’t get the opportunity to ask them due to time constraints. Adding more interactive discussions or hands-on exercises could further enhance the learning experience and make it even more engaging

Configuring Cisco Software-Defined Access (SD-Access)

In some cases the configuration is not straight forward or intuitive, in other cases it is difficult to find the right guide
No - we have not done any customization to the interface
Yes - we have added extensive custom code

Cisco Software-Defined Access (SD-Access) Support

ProsCons
No escalation required
Immediate help available
Support understands my problem
Poor followup
Less knowledgeable
Support doesn't seem to care
Slow Initial Response
Yes, plus Cisco CX
CX support helped us escalate some issues to the right person

Using Cisco Software-Defined Access (SD-Access)

It is difficult to start using the product due to its unfamiliar name and acronyms. ,The task should be accomplished in a specific order to ensure success
ProsCons
None
Unnecessarily complex
Difficult to use
Requires technical support
Inconsistent
Slow to learn
Cumbersome
Feel nervous using
Lots to learn
  • GUI
  • ISE integration
  • LAN automation
  • Multicast implementation

Cisco Software-Defined Access (SD-Access) Reliability

Integrating Cisco Software-Defined Access (SD-Access)

Relationship with Cisco

Upgrading Cisco Software-Defined Access (SD-Access)

Comments

More Reviews of Cisco SD-Access