#SDA shaking trust in Cisco
Updated March 14, 2025
#SDA shaking trust in Cisco

Score 8 out of 10
Vetted Review
Verified User
Overall Satisfaction with Cisco Software-Defined Access (SD-Access)
I am using SDA in part of my Campus infrastructure. It supposed to be easier to administrate , fewer manpower, it turns out the the solution need a dedicated team to deal with all the bugs.
Pros
- Automation for daily activities (DNA)
- Telemetry (DNA)
Cons
- NOT Micro segmentation for Broadcast and multicast
- NOT Supporting Multicast over SD transit
- NOT Supporting silent host
- Demanding advantage license
- The LCM become bloody expensive
- Cisco Identity Services Engine (ISE)
It helps with 802.1X
Do you think Cisco Software-Defined Access (SD-Access) delivers good value for the price?
No
Are you happy with Cisco Software-Defined Access (SD-Access)'s feature set?
No
Did Cisco Software-Defined Access (SD-Access) live up to sales and marketing promises?
No
Did implementation of Cisco Software-Defined Access (SD-Access) go as expected?
No
Would you buy Cisco Software-Defined Access (SD-Access) again?
No
Using Cisco Software-Defined Access (SD-Access)
16 - The total number of end users using a SDA network is about 2500.
7 - Network operation team , campus network experience (routing, switching , ISE)
- ZTP
- Segmentation
- standardized configuration
- SGT/Segmentation
- Assurance and troubleshooting
Evaluating Cisco Software-Defined Access (SD-Access) and Competitors
Yes - A traditional Layer 2 (L2) campus network based on HPE (Hewlett Packard Enterprise) networking equipment follows a hierarchical design consisting of Access, Distribution, and Core layers.
- Ease of Use
- Other
Automation , ease to use , elimination of L2 and spanning tree
To implement an eBGP-VXLAN EVPN network using Cisco hardware, with an automation framework powered by Ansible
Cisco Software-Defined Access (SD-Access) Implementation
- Implemented in-house
- Third-party professional services
Cisco CX
Change management was a big part of the implementation and was well-handled
- Complexity
- License related questions
Cisco Software-Defined Access (SD-Access) Training
Configuring Cisco Software-Defined Access (SD-Access)
I am trying to follow Ciscos best practices
https://www.ciscolive.com/c/dam/r/ciscolive/global-event/docs/2024/pdf/BRKENS-2502.pdf
https://www.ciscolive.com/c/dam/r/ciscolive/global-event/docs/2024/pdf/BRKENS-2502.pdf
No - we have not done any customization to the interface
Yes - we have added extensive custom code
Cisco Software-Defined Access (SD-Access) Support
| Pros | Cons |
|---|---|
No escalation required Immediate help available Support understands my problem | Poor followup Less knowledgeable Support doesn't seem to care Slow Initial Response |
Yes, plus Cisco CX
CX support helped us escalate some issues to the right person
Using Cisco Software-Defined Access (SD-Access)
| Pros | Cons |
|---|---|
None | Unnecessarily complex Difficult to use Requires technical support Inconsistent Slow to learn Cumbersome Feel nervous using Lots to learn |
- GUI
- ISE integration
- LAN automation
- Multicast implementation
Cisco Software-Defined Access (SD-Access) Reliability
Integrating Cisco Software-Defined Access (SD-Access)
- ISE
- Splunk
- NSX-T
- Fortigate
- API (e.g. SOAP or REST)
Relationship with Cisco
Support and Cisco CX
No ,i do not have something specific
Upgrading Cisco Software-Defined Access (SD-Access)
- Ability to use Multicast
- Full support for Vxlan EBGP EVPN
Comments
Please log in to join the conversation