Cisco SD-Access vs VMware NSX

• Enhanced user experience
• Better manageability

Read full review

• Broadcast Suppression: By suppressing broadcast traffic, we have been able to deploy a single VDI network in a /18 network space, allowing for rapid growth and proper DHCP lease timing for a VDI instant clone environment.
• Networking HA: Leveraging internal mechanisms for high availability, it provides disaster resiliency to a virtual networking environment.
• Cost Savings: All available features of NSX are licensed simultaneously. Load balancers, firewalls, and routers are all licensed as features, not per object, allowing for the deployment of as many of these objects as are needed.

Read full review

• Better functionality with ISE
• Better documentation of all the config that DNA-C adds to the on-boarded devices

Read full review

• Our biggest challenge is gaining acceptance from network engineers who are used to working with other technologies.

Read full review

• Investment made last year and ROI already showing, because we combined it with our hardware refresh.

Read full review

• We are a company with 300 VM's and few departments, the investment was more for security, putting in ROI, we can mention that environmental security is priceless.
• We have a simplified understanding of east-west rules, bringing a lot of satisfaction to the user, since creating and modifying rules is a very simple activity.
• With NSX for virtual environment, the IT team was also very satisfied with the communication without the need for a physical medium (Switch for example). The machines that need more performance, are placed on the same physical Host, as a rule of affinity and with that the performance reaches the expected very easy.

Read full review