Cisco TrustSec vs. SUSE Security

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Cisco TrustSec
Score 7.2 out of 10
N/A
N/AN/A
SUSE Security
Score 8.0 out of 10
N/A
SUSE® Security (formerly NeuVector) provides an end-to-end container security platform. This includes end-to-end vulnerability scanning and complete run-time protection for containers, pods and hosts.
$0
Pricing
Cisco TrustSecSUSE Security
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Cisco TrustSecSUSE Security
Free Trial
NoNo
Free/Freemium Version
NoYes
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Cisco TrustSecSUSE Security
Best Alternatives
Cisco TrustSecSUSE Security
Small Businesses
Armor
Armor
Score 6.0 out of 10
Portainer
Portainer
Score 9.0 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
Druva Security Cloud
Druva Security Cloud
Score 9.4 out of 10
NGINX
NGINX
Score 9.1 out of 10
Enterprises
Druva Security Cloud
Druva Security Cloud
Score 9.4 out of 10
NGINX
NGINX
Score 9.1 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
Cisco TrustSecSUSE Security
Likelihood to Recommend
9.0
(1 ratings)
8.3
(2 ratings)
User Testimonials
Cisco TrustSecSUSE Security
Likelihood to Recommend
Cisco
  • Control access to critical enterprise resources by business role, device type, and location, so policy changes can be made without redesigning the network.
  • Easily manage access control and segmentation while maintaining compliance.
  • Create and manage policies in an easy-to-use matrix.
  • Reduce the need for costly network re-architecture by automating firewall rules and access control list (ACL) administration.
Read full review
SUSE
SUSE NeuVector is exceptional when you want to make your Kubernetes cluster secure. You can limit network connections, scan containers, container registries and Kubernetes nodes for vulnerable software, forbid running specific commands on certain or all containers. You can enable security for individual containers - when SUSE NeuVector has learned container specifics. That's why you can deploy SUSE NeuVector on production Kubernetes clusters where you are already running conteiners - it will not break anything.
Read full review
Pros
Cisco
  • Reduce operational expenses by simplifying network segmentation and defining security groups based on business roles, not IP addresses.
  • Limit the impact of a data breach by quickly isolating and containing threats using technology already in your network.
Read full review
SUSE
  • Scans containers software for known vulnerabilities
  • Denies command execution in containers
  • Prevents unwanted network connections from/to containers
Read full review
Cons
Cisco
  • Help and solutions if needed, support
Read full review
SUSE
  • I like everything about NeuVector. They are on the right development path.
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
Cisco
No answers on this topic
SUSE
SUSE NeuVector is deployed on your Kubernetes, and data does not leave your data center. Sysdig is a cloud platform - you have no full control over what happens with your data. Also, SUSE NeuVector has a capability to prevent specific command execution ir containers, but Sysdig does not have such ability. Sysdig is not an open-source solution, but SUSE NeuVector is.
Read full review
Return on Investment
Cisco
  • Reduction in IT operational costs
Read full review
SUSE
  • We went from being blind to what happens in the Kubernetes network to seeing everything and being able to control Kubernetes network communications.
  • Now we are able to detect vulnerable containers faster.
Read full review
ScreenShots